Official Top Ten Tournament (January)

[COFFIN DODGER]

@MaCc and @Craps I got too much on to take part this month , give macc a bye to next round as I am doing another tourney already , as well as the lbt and going for #1 this month so will be too much .

[COFFIN DODGER]

@MaCc and @Craps I got too much on to take part this month , give macc a bye to next round as I am doing another tourney already , as well as the lbt and going for #1 this month so will be too much .

[Paroemiographer]

Originally Posted by stevevenom

@MaCc and @Craps I got too much on to take part this month , give macc a bye to next round as I am doing another tourney already , as well as the lbt and going for #1 this month so will be too much .

That's perfectly fine. @MaCc what ever u have written for steve just save it till he drops an open or you can send as you please. If you send by your deadline tho and he responds by his, the winner will move on to the next round. The choice is your own.

[Paroemiographer]

Originally Posted by stevevenom

@MaCc and @Craps I got too much on to take part this month , give macc a bye to next round as I am doing another tourney already , as well as the lbt and going for #1 this month so will be too much .

That's perfectly fine. @MaCc what ever u have written for steve just save it till he drops an open or you can send as you please. If you send by your deadline tho and he responds by his, the winner will move on to the next round. The choice is your own.

[MaCc Da G0D]

Originally Posted by Nou

That's perfectly fine. @MaCc what ever u have written for steve just save it till he drops an open or you can send as you please. If you send by your deadline tho and he responds by his, the winner will move on to the next round. The choice is your own.

Ill Just Save It Boss. no Problem. Good Lucc Stevie!!

[MaCc Da G0D]

Originally Posted by Nou

That's perfectly fine. @MaCc what ever u have written for steve just save it till he drops an open or you can send as you please. If you send by your deadline tho and he responds by his, the winner will move on to the next round. The choice is your own.

Ill Just Save It Boss. no Problem. Good Lucc Stevie!!

[Paroemiographer]

Originally Posted by MaCc

Ill Just Save It Boss. no Problem. Good Lucc Stevie!!

Now the sender pretty much HAS TO send unless the responder tells me that he won't be participating before the tournament starts, but as I already said, if MaCc still wanted to send maybe not wanting to have his bars wasted mainly on a nameplay basis, he could, and if steve happened to respond by the 7th and wins, he'd advance to the next round and MaCc would be eliminated. It would be smart if MaCc waited till after the deadline to send, and it would have been better for steve if I had addressed this earlier and he hadn't said a word about it, because he could have advanced if MaCc happened to not send, but MaCc already stated he was participating in this, so that pretty much eliminates everything I just said. Lol. Just for future reference tho.

Also, senders MUST post the link to this thread after they send their verse to their opponent BEFORE THE DEADLINE or they will be disqualified.

---------- Post added at 05:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------

@NOBLE @Student @Pugz @RULE @Row wth are the awards on this? The tourney starts tomorrow. People are interested, just ain't posting to this thread. It should get live once the awards for this get announced.

[Paroemiographer]

Originally Posted by MaCc

Ill Just Save It Boss. no Problem. Good Lucc Stevie!!

Now the sender pretty much HAS TO send unless the responder tells me that he won't be participating before the tournament starts, but as I already said, if MaCc still wanted to send maybe not wanting to have his bars wasted mainly on a nameplay basis, he could, and if steve happened to respond by the 7th and wins, he'd advance to the next round and MaCc would be eliminated. It would be smart if MaCc waited till after the deadline to send, and it would have been better for steve if I had addressed this earlier and he hadn't said a word about it, because he could have advanced if MaCc happened to not send, but MaCc already stated he was participating in this, so that pretty much eliminates everything I just said. Lol. Just for future reference tho.

Also, senders MUST post the link to this thread after they send their verse to their opponent BEFORE THE DEADLINE or they will be disqualified.

---------- Post added at 05:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------

@NOBLE @Student @Pugz @RULE @Row wth are the awards on this? The tourney starts tomorrow. People are interested, just ain't posting to this thread. It should get live once the awards for this get announced.

[Akaap]

Like the idea, this month I'm out though...working on too much outside of LB

[Akaap]

Like the idea, this month I'm out though...working on too much outside of LB

[Paroemiographer]

Originally Posted by Akaap

Like the idea, this month I'm out though...working on too much outside of LB

So @O_G and @MaCc advances to the second round. Either @O_G will be facing me or @SuperGuy and @MaCc will be facing either @CoRe sOuL or @RipThaRappa in the subsequent round.

@Akaap thanks for letting me know this ahead of time. Makes it less of a pain on me and the participants.

[Paroemiographer]

Originally Posted by Akaap

Like the idea, this month I'm out though...working on too much outside of LB

So @O_G and @MaCc advances to the second round. Either @O_G will be facing me or @SuperGuy and @MaCc will be facing either @CoRe sOuL or @RipThaRappa in the subsequent round.

@Akaap thanks for letting me know this ahead of time. Makes it less of a pain on me and the participants.

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Nou

[/COLOR]@NOBLE @Student @Pugz @RULE @Row wth are the awards on this? The tourney starts tomorrow. People are interested, just ain't posting to this thread. It should get live once the awards for this get announced.

I'm not sure who gave the okay for this or said it was "official," but you shouldn't tell people they'll be receiving an award without staff sponsorship. This isn't something we'd be willing to sponsor every month for several reasons: 1) We relegate forum tourneys to the off months of the Text or Audio Tournament schedules. If you're planning on running a forum tourney (with staff sponsorship), make sure it doesn't conflict with the months that official Text tournaments take place (if it's a Text forum tourney) or the months that official Audio tournaments take place (if it's an Audio forum tourney). The reason is because we don't want too many simultaneous tournaments running at once, especially with the limited amount of members we have right now. It just increases the amount of no-shows when people sign up for multiple tourneys they can't commit to, and it also cheapens the value of a tournament win/prize when there are too many (think supply and demand).

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Nou

[/COLOR]@NOBLE @Student @Pugz @RULE @Row wth are the awards on this? The tourney starts tomorrow. People are interested, just ain't posting to this thread. It should get live once the awards for this get announced.

I'm not sure who gave the okay for this or said it was "official," but you shouldn't tell people they'll be receiving an award without staff sponsorship. This isn't something we'd be willing to sponsor every month for several reasons: 1) We relegate forum tourneys to the off months of the Text or Audio Tournament schedules. If you're planning on running a forum tourney (with staff sponsorship), make sure it doesn't conflict with the months that official Text tournaments take place (if it's a Text forum tourney) or the months that official Audio tournaments take place (if it's an Audio forum tourney). The reason is because we don't want too many simultaneous tournaments running at once, especially with the limited amount of members we have right now. It just increases the amount of no-shows when people sign up for multiple tourneys they can't commit to, and it also cheapens the value of a tournament win/prize when there are too many (think supply and demand).