Proposed Cap

[ILLoKWENT]

you may as well just eliminate the 'start an open battle' or disable it... that would really force people to only rely on actually sending battles/blinddrops

[ILLoKWENT]

you may as well just eliminate the 'start an open battle' or disable it... that would really force people to only rely on actually sending battles/blinddrops

[AfterThought]

Originally Posted by ILLoKWENT

you may as well just eliminate the 'start an open battle' or disable it... that would really force people to only rely on actually sending battles/blinddrops

^Cosign, maybe we can try that.

[AfterThought]

Originally Posted by ILLoKWENT

you may as well just eliminate the 'start an open battle' or disable it... that would really force people to only rely on actually sending battles/blinddrops

^Cosign, maybe we can try that.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by ILLoKWENT

you may as well just eliminate the 'start an open battle' or disable it... that would really force people to only rely on actually sending battles/blinddrops

Thats too extreme.

Being able to post opens so you can write w.e you want is something L.B has always offered over other current sites. Why would you remove that 1 plus we have over others completely. The idea is to reign it in to within reason not kill it completely, it's what makes L.B unique.

Plus the way you have to send battles here isn't exactly noob friendly. At least with an extra option of posting opens you get people posting some form of battles to gradually wanting too and learning to send private battles through the communication they had with other members through open/snipes.

What you're saying is a sure fire way to kill L.B battle activity.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by ILLoKWENT

you may as well just eliminate the 'start an open battle' or disable it... that would really force people to only rely on actually sending battles/blinddrops

Thats too extreme.

Being able to post opens so you can write w.e you want is something L.B has always offered over other current sites. Why would you remove that 1 plus we have over others completely. The idea is to reign it in to within reason not kill it completely, it's what makes L.B unique.

Plus the way you have to send battles here isn't exactly noob friendly. At least with an extra option of posting opens you get people posting some form of battles to gradually wanting too and learning to send private battles through the communication they had with other members through open/snipes.

What you're saying is a sure fire way to kill L.B battle activity.

[ILLoKWENT]

Originally Posted by Indianapolis Jones

Thats too extreme.

Being able to post opens so you can write w.e you want is something L.B has always offered over other current sites. Why would you remove that 1 plus we have over others completely. The idea is to reign it in to within reason not kill it completely, it's what makes L.B unique.

Plus the way you have to send battles here isn't exactly noob friendly. At least with an extra option of posting opens you get people posting some form of battles to gradually wanting too and learning to send private battles through the communication they had with other members through open/snipes.

What you're saying is a sure fire way to kill L.B battle activity.

i also dont see the point of 'reigning it in'...u have dudes like bnas who are obsessively battling like it was some kind of crack ..and being active.. yes he drops terrible shit everytime he battles, but where is the logic in impeding or limiting access because its 'overused' its sounds like a tmobile data plan..lol as u said the open battle option is great but limiting activity and going thru all that ish for possibly one dude 'bnas' is counterproductive...you cant have it halfassed... either disable the feature or allow it to be utilized how it was designed for... because limiting the amount a person can drop opens wont stop bnas from being active....... what u can do if your concerned with the ranking system is not count snipes points toward your record.... only allow actual sends to count....and have the open battle as a sort of practice type option for the noobs.. naysayers will always hate on LB for the simple reason that as slow as we are , were still extremely more active than any forum site hands down... the only collateral damage is theres alot of shitty battles out mixed with good ones... but shit id take that over 4 dope battles out and 1 week to gain 1 or 2 votes...thats the tru definition of dead

[ILLoKWENT]

Originally Posted by Indianapolis Jones

Thats too extreme.

Being able to post opens so you can write w.e you want is something L.B has always offered over other current sites. Why would you remove that 1 plus we have over others completely. The idea is to reign it in to within reason not kill it completely, it's what makes L.B unique.

Plus the way you have to send battles here isn't exactly noob friendly. At least with an extra option of posting opens you get people posting some form of battles to gradually wanting too and learning to send private battles through the communication they had with other members through open/snipes.

What you're saying is a sure fire way to kill L.B battle activity.

i also dont see the point of 'reigning it in'...u have dudes like bnas who are obsessively battling like it was some kind of crack ..and being active.. yes he drops terrible shit everytime he battles, but where is the logic in impeding or limiting access because its 'overused' its sounds like a tmobile data plan..lol as u said the open battle option is great but limiting activity and going thru all that ish for possibly one dude 'bnas' is counterproductive...you cant have it halfassed... either disable the feature or allow it to be utilized how it was designed for... because limiting the amount a person can drop opens wont stop bnas from being active....... what u can do if your concerned with the ranking system is not count snipes points toward your record.... only allow actual sends to count....and have the open battle as a sort of practice type option for the noobs.. naysayers will always hate on LB for the simple reason that as slow as we are , were still extremely more active than any forum site hands down... the only collateral damage is theres alot of shitty battles out mixed with good ones... but shit id take that over 4 dope battles out and 1 week to gain 1 or 2 votes...thats the tru definition of dead