Proposed Cap

[Student]

1-2 opens a day isn't that bad tbh It would force people to write less but hopefully these use the cap to they're advantage and only put out top shelf bars instead of typing out non-sense to get 50+ wins per month

[Student]

1-2 opens a day isn't that bad tbh It would force people to write less but hopefully these use the cap to they're advantage and only put out top shelf bars instead of typing out non-sense to get 50+ wins per month

[ILLoKWENT]

Well... it never hurts to try... @Pugz give the cap a try..

[ILLoKWENT]

Well... it never hurts to try... @Pugz give the cap a try..

[Óðinn]

Yeah, the cap would be a good idea.

2 Opens a day. You can accept only 1 open a day. You can send any amount of private battles.

Also, this could work in favor for Exclusive. Have the Exclusive side with unlimited Opens... It'd bring back that side. (having them pay for Exclusive that is)

[Óðinn]

Yeah, the cap would be a good idea.

2 Opens a day. You can accept only 1 open a day. You can send any amount of private battles.

Also, this could work in favor for Exclusive. Have the Exclusive side with unlimited Opens... It'd bring back that side. (having them pay for Exclusive that is)

[Mindless]

Originally Posted by Indianapolis Jones

But it isn't for 1 guy though. This has been going on for years.

Lets look at it like this.

The idea is to obviously cut down on sniping (Well a big part of it is to anyway)

These guys are addicted to posting verses, so what? You think they're just going to stop posting verses because of the imposed cap. Thats not how addictions work. you don't just say well aiiiiight then thats it. You look elsewhere to get your fix.

The only elsewhere in the equation is actively seeking out people to battle on lets beef because they sure as hell aren't going to get their fix anywhere else, especially when we're still offering them a chance to post their opens and snipes, just at a capped rate. - Vodafone rep.

Lol.

Say you cap at the 2 to 1 Pugz is suggesting.

Thats 21 battles a week from sniping and opens.

Thats A LOT.

But at least this way it ENCOURAGES.. Not FORCES people to seek out legit competitors. Take more time with their work because they can't play the percentages game of "Oh I'll post 100 battles so what if I lose 5" as much.

It stops people getting sniped by the same people over and over again which happens at a ridiculous rate. I've seen cases where people have been sniped by the same guy anywhere up to 7 times in 1 day. I've seen people sit around waiting to snipe everyone and anyone who dares post an open to the point the new battles list has the same guys name on it through out I mean c'mon wtf. This isn't good for the site, not in any way shape or form.

Poor and rushed voting is a result of this. But. Posting opens and sniping still has it's place.

There's no half measure. It's all about finding a happy medium where everyone gets what they want and everyone benefits.

Everytime this site has took things from 1 extreme to another it's lead to nothing but bad things.

Pretty much this. There needs to be some kind of limit due to people like Cash One and MaCc existing. At least as long as the all time list is based solely off of wins. 21 battles a week is more than enough for anyone not trying to flood cheap wins in to climb up the list.

[Mindless]

Originally Posted by Indianapolis Jones

But it isn't for 1 guy though. This has been going on for years.

Lets look at it like this.

The idea is to obviously cut down on sniping (Well a big part of it is to anyway)

These guys are addicted to posting verses, so what? You think they're just going to stop posting verses because of the imposed cap. Thats not how addictions work. you don't just say well aiiiiight then thats it. You look elsewhere to get your fix.

The only elsewhere in the equation is actively seeking out people to battle on lets beef because they sure as hell aren't going to get their fix anywhere else, especially when we're still offering them a chance to post their opens and snipes, just at a capped rate. - Vodafone rep.

Lol.

Say you cap at the 2 to 1 Pugz is suggesting.

Thats 21 battles a week from sniping and opens.

Thats A LOT.

But at least this way it ENCOURAGES.. Not FORCES people to seek out legit competitors. Take more time with their work because they can't play the percentages game of "Oh I'll post 100 battles so what if I lose 5" as much.

It stops people getting sniped by the same people over and over again which happens at a ridiculous rate. I've seen cases where people have been sniped by the same guy anywhere up to 7 times in 1 day. I've seen people sit around waiting to snipe everyone and anyone who dares post an open to the point the new battles list has the same guys name on it through out I mean c'mon wtf. This isn't good for the site, not in any way shape or form.

Poor and rushed voting is a result of this. But. Posting opens and sniping still has it's place.

There's no half measure. It's all about finding a happy medium where everyone gets what they want and everyone benefits.

Everytime this site has took things from 1 extreme to another it's lead to nothing but bad things.

Pretty much this. There needs to be some kind of limit due to people like Cash One and MaCc existing. At least as long as the all time list is based solely off of wins. 21 battles a week is more than enough for anyone not trying to flood cheap wins in to climb up the list.

Lmfao yeah, this has worked out great recently. Dumbest idea ever.

Lmfao yeah, this has worked out great recently. Dumbest idea ever.