FVC Contests Archives.

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by ShotsFired™

@NOBLE my 10 are done

Dope!

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by ShotsFired™

@NOBLE my 10 are done

Dope!

[Ghambit]

MY 10 ARE IN BRO...JUX IN TIME LOL

[Ghambit]

MY 10 ARE IN BRO...JUX IN TIME LOL

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Ghambit

MY 10 ARE IN BRO...JUX IN TIME LOL

Thanks bro.

---------- Post added at 09:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:33 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Mind Fuck

Votes (1 - 10)

1.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...218&section=tb

2.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...315&section=tb

3.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...346&section=tb

4.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...405&section=tb

5.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...236&section=tb

6.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...156&section=tb

7.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...390&section=tb

8.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...370&section=tb

9.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...256&section=tb

10.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...162&section=tb

@Mind Fuck your number 4, 6, 7, and 9 battles either never made it to hotlist or hasn't made it. Can you vote on 4 more hotlist battles please?

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Ghambit

MY 10 ARE IN BRO...JUX IN TIME LOL

Thanks bro.

---------- Post added at 09:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:33 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Mind Fuck

Votes (1 - 10)

1.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...218&section=tb

2.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...315&section=tb

3.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...346&section=tb

4.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...405&section=tb

5.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...236&section=tb

6.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...156&section=tb

7.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...390&section=tb

8.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...370&section=tb

9.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...256&section=tb

10.) http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...162&section=tb

@Mind Fuck your number 4, 6, 7, and 9 battles either never made it to hotlist or hasn't made it. Can you vote on 4 more hotlist battles please?

[Phroxen]

Voted on 11, since my longest vote never got hot listed. Not gonna edit the first thread coz it'll fuck up the time stamp, but just scratch #1.

[Phroxen]

Voted on 11, since my longest vote never got hot listed. Not gonna edit the first thread coz it'll fuck up the time stamp, but just scratch #1.

[NOBLE]

ROUND 1
@GOOD GRIEF vs @Mind Fuck
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...162&section=tb)
Mind Fuck: Anarchist: 7 / CulpritT: 8
GOOD GRIEF: Anarchist: 6 / CulpritT: 7
I felt GOOD GRIEF dropped the better overall vote in this match-up. His vote was more involved. He highlighted problem areas but also mentioned what they did well. Mind Fuck gave a nice synopsis as well, but GOOD GRIEF went into more detail and also gave a more personal perspective which can be beneficial to battlers. I also preferred GOOD GRIEF's ratings in this battle. If I had to vote, I probably would have given the same ratings. 8 and 7 just seems a bit high for the output of CulpritT and Anarchist in that battle to me.
Vote: GOOD GRIEF

---------- Post added at 04:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:07 AM ----------

@Unyqe vs @Ghambit
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=452307)
Ghambit: Adubs KiloG: 8 / opFOR: 8
Unyqe: Adubs KiloG: 6 / opFOR: 6
Honestly, I felt you both picked the wrong winner here and I voted in that battle as well. We must have been looking at two different things. I'm not going to compare my vote to yours though, I'm going to compare both your votes to each other, but suffice it to say that I generally disagreed with both your assessments of this battle. I felt Ghambit did better at explaining why he voted the way he did, but Unyqe gave a more realistic rating. 8's for those verses was kinda high. Both your votes have their merits, but due to a more thorough explanation, I'm giving my vote to Ghambit in this match-up.
Vote: Ghambit

---------- Post added at 04:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:08 AM ----------

@The Black Book vs @Phroxen
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...166&section=tb)
The Black Book: Jimmy Dean™: 7 / Xplissit: 7
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=452516)
Phroxen: Adubs KiloG: 6 / Seiji: 5
Two different battles were randomly picked and examined here because you guys didn't vote on the same two battles. I felt you both gave accurate ratings for your respective battles, but The Black Book gave a more thorough explanation of his vote. I felt you both could have been less vague. Using terms like "one was smoother" or "one had some okay schemes", it's conceivable that the people you were addressing could have been unsure of exactly who you were referring to at certain points. I think this is something we've all been guilty of, but it is more preferable to be direct and say exactly who you're addressing in your expo. In this match-up, I'll have to say The Black Book dropped the better overall vote.
Vote: The Black Book

---------- Post added at 05:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:51 AM ----------

All of ILLoKWENT's judge points have been added for all 3 rounds. You guys can private message him if you need an expo on why he voted the way he did. I'll be back to drop my rates and expos for rounds 2 and 3 and still waiting on AfterThought.

[NOBLE]

ROUND 1
@GOOD GRIEF vs @Mind Fuck
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...162&section=tb)
Mind Fuck: Anarchist: 7 / CulpritT: 8
GOOD GRIEF: Anarchist: 6 / CulpritT: 7
I felt GOOD GRIEF dropped the better overall vote in this match-up. His vote was more involved. He highlighted problem areas but also mentioned what they did well. Mind Fuck gave a nice synopsis as well, but GOOD GRIEF went into more detail and also gave a more personal perspective which can be beneficial to battlers. I also preferred GOOD GRIEF's ratings in this battle. If I had to vote, I probably would have given the same ratings. 8 and 7 just seems a bit high for the output of CulpritT and Anarchist in that battle to me.
Vote: GOOD GRIEF

---------- Post added at 04:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:07 AM ----------

@Unyqe vs @Ghambit
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=452307)
Ghambit: Adubs KiloG: 8 / opFOR: 8
Unyqe: Adubs KiloG: 6 / opFOR: 6
Honestly, I felt you both picked the wrong winner here and I voted in that battle as well. We must have been looking at two different things. I'm not going to compare my vote to yours though, I'm going to compare both your votes to each other, but suffice it to say that I generally disagreed with both your assessments of this battle. I felt Ghambit did better at explaining why he voted the way he did, but Unyqe gave a more realistic rating. 8's for those verses was kinda high. Both your votes have their merits, but due to a more thorough explanation, I'm giving my vote to Ghambit in this match-up.
Vote: Ghambit

---------- Post added at 04:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:08 AM ----------

@The Black Book vs @Phroxen
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...166&section=tb)
The Black Book: Jimmy Dean™: 7 / Xplissit: 7
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=452516)
Phroxen: Adubs KiloG: 6 / Seiji: 5
Two different battles were randomly picked and examined here because you guys didn't vote on the same two battles. I felt you both gave accurate ratings for your respective battles, but The Black Book gave a more thorough explanation of his vote. I felt you both could have been less vague. Using terms like "one was smoother" or "one had some okay schemes", it's conceivable that the people you were addressing could have been unsure of exactly who you were referring to at certain points. I think this is something we've all been guilty of, but it is more preferable to be direct and say exactly who you're addressing in your expo. In this match-up, I'll have to say The Black Book dropped the better overall vote.
Vote: The Black Book

---------- Post added at 05:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:51 AM ----------

All of ILLoKWENT's judge points have been added for all 3 rounds. You guys can private message him if you need an expo on why he voted the way he did. I'll be back to drop my rates and expos for rounds 2 and 3 and still waiting on AfterThought.

[Ghambit]

So im guessin no one else is voting?

[Ghambit]

So im guessin no one else is voting?

[Mind Fuck]

Originally Posted by Ghambit

So im guessin no one else is voting?

im on the same page

@NOBLE

when does a round 2/ semi finals commence//

[Mind Fuck]

Originally Posted by Ghambit

So im guessin no one else is voting?

im on the same page

@NOBLE

when does a round 2/ semi finals commence//

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Mind Fuck

im on the same page

@NOBLE

when does a round 2/ semi finals commence//

Sorry I haven't dropped the rest of my votes yet, but I will do them today and still waiting on @AfterThought's votes.

---------- Post added at 02:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 PM ----------

ROUND 2
@Ghambit vs @The Black Book
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...287&section=tb)
Ghambit: Jonny Jigsaw: 5 / UhMAZING: 7
The Black Book: Jonny Jigsaw: 2 / UhMAZING: 4
Both of your expos were pretty decent. I felt Ghambit sounded a bit more positive and encouraging. The main thing that stood out to me though was the difference in rating. Ghambit, I felt your ratings were extremely generous. To me, neither one of their verses amonted to a 5 (average). They were both below average, one was just further below than the other. The Black Book's ratings were a lot more accurate and realistic so my my vote goes to him. Vote: The Black Book.

---------- Post added at 03:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------

@Phroxen vs @Unyqe
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...495&section=tb)
Phroxen: Cak3dOut: 6 / Saibot: 4
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=452133)
Unyqe: ladyvenom: 7 / UhMAZING: 5
I felt you both could have been more direct in your expos. What ultimately made my decision was the rating. I felt 7 was a bit high for ladyvenom. He had flow, but no real punches. You were both pretty vague, but Phroxen gave the more realistic/accurate ratings in this matchu-up. Vote: Phroxen

---------- Post added at 03:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:16 PM ----------

@ShotsFired™ vs @GOOD GRIEF
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...370&section=tb)
ShotsFired™: MadVerbs: 8 / Prospect-JS: 7
GOOD GRIEF: MadVerbs: 7 / Prospect-JS: 6
Both your expos were pretty nice. You both pointed out that Prospect shouldn't have repeated himself. I felt ShotsFired gave the more preferable overall expo. GOOD GRIEF mentioned that Prospect used filler, but the term "filler" is sort of generic and can mean different things to different people, so perhaps it would have been better to define that with context. I felt GOOD GRIEF gave the more accurate ratings. ShotsFired's ratings were a tad bit high, but looking at everything, I'm leaning towards ShotsFired for the better overall vote (almost lost it with the high ratings though). Vote: ShotsFired.

---------- Post added at 04:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:45 PM ----------

Round 3
@The Black Book vs @ShotsFired™
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...301&section=tb)
The Black Book: Cray: 5 / J-WIN: 3
ShotsFired™: Cray: 7 / J-WIN: 4
I felt The Black Book did a lot better in this match-up, starting with the fact that he was more direct in mentioning the battlers' names while addressing them. He also went further to explain why he voted the way he voted. Vote: The Black Book

---------- Post added at 04:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:05 PM ----------

@Unyqe vs @Mind Fuck
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=452346)
Mind Fuck: DooX: 4 / MadVerbs: 5
Unyqe: DooX: 5 / MadVerbs: 6
I felt Mind Fuck went a little further in his expo. You both could have been less vague, but at least Mind Fuck's expo was a bit more clear with him referencing the "winner" and "loser." Vote: Mind Fuck

---------- Post added at 04:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:14 PM ----------

@GOOD GRIEF vs @Ghambit
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...458&section=tb)
Ghambit: BOS 720: 5 / METH_BARZ: 7
GOOD GRIEF: BOS 720: 4 / METH_BARZ: 5
[/CENTER][/QUOTE]
You both mentioned that Bos should fill in the box and that they needed to improve their punches. I just felt Ghambit did better at explaining all that. He also mentioned a couple of things that GG didn't. For this matc-up, I'll have to go with Ghambit. Vote: Ghambit.

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Mind Fuck

im on the same page

@NOBLE

when does a round 2/ semi finals commence//

Sorry I haven't dropped the rest of my votes yet, but I will do them today and still waiting on @AfterThought's votes.

---------- Post added at 02:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 PM ----------

ROUND 2
@Ghambit vs @The Black Book
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...287&section=tb)
Ghambit: Jonny Jigsaw: 5 / UhMAZING: 7
The Black Book: Jonny Jigsaw: 2 / UhMAZING: 4
Both of your expos were pretty decent. I felt Ghambit sounded a bit more positive and encouraging. The main thing that stood out to me though was the difference in rating. Ghambit, I felt your ratings were extremely generous. To me, neither one of their verses amonted to a 5 (average). They were both below average, one was just further below than the other. The Black Book's ratings were a lot more accurate and realistic so my my vote goes to him. Vote: The Black Book.

---------- Post added at 03:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------

@Phroxen vs @Unyqe
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...495&section=tb)
Phroxen: Cak3dOut: 6 / Saibot: 4
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=452133)
Unyqe: ladyvenom: 7 / UhMAZING: 5
I felt you both could have been more direct in your expos. What ultimately made my decision was the rating. I felt 7 was a bit high for ladyvenom. He had flow, but no real punches. You were both pretty vague, but Phroxen gave the more realistic/accurate ratings in this matchu-up. Vote: Phroxen

---------- Post added at 03:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:16 PM ----------

@ShotsFired™ vs @GOOD GRIEF
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...370&section=tb)
ShotsFired™: MadVerbs: 8 / Prospect-JS: 7
GOOD GRIEF: MadVerbs: 7 / Prospect-JS: 6
Both your expos were pretty nice. You both pointed out that Prospect shouldn't have repeated himself. I felt ShotsFired gave the more preferable overall expo. GOOD GRIEF mentioned that Prospect used filler, but the term "filler" is sort of generic and can mean different things to different people, so perhaps it would have been better to define that with context. I felt GOOD GRIEF gave the more accurate ratings. ShotsFired's ratings were a tad bit high, but looking at everything, I'm leaning towards ShotsFired for the better overall vote (almost lost it with the high ratings though). Vote: ShotsFired.

---------- Post added at 04:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:45 PM ----------

Round 3
@The Black Book vs @ShotsFired™
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...301&section=tb)
The Black Book: Cray: 5 / J-WIN: 3
ShotsFired™: Cray: 7 / J-WIN: 4
I felt The Black Book did a lot better in this match-up, starting with the fact that he was more direct in mentioning the battlers' names while addressing them. He also went further to explain why he voted the way he voted. Vote: The Black Book

---------- Post added at 04:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:05 PM ----------

@Unyqe vs @Mind Fuck
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=452346)
Mind Fuck: DooX: 4 / MadVerbs: 5
Unyqe: DooX: 5 / MadVerbs: 6
I felt Mind Fuck went a little further in his expo. You both could have been less vague, but at least Mind Fuck's expo was a bit more clear with him referencing the "winner" and "loser." Vote: Mind Fuck

---------- Post added at 04:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:14 PM ----------

@GOOD GRIEF vs @Ghambit
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...458&section=tb)
Ghambit: BOS 720: 5 / METH_BARZ: 7
GOOD GRIEF: BOS 720: 4 / METH_BARZ: 5
[/CENTER][/QUOTE]
You both mentioned that Bos should fill in the box and that they needed to improve their punches. I just felt Ghambit did better at explaining all that. He also mentioned a couple of things that GG didn't. For this matc-up, I'll have to go with Ghambit. Vote: Ghambit.

[NOBLE]

AfterThought has given me his votes and the points have been added. You guys can hit him up if you need an expo. The final points tally is as follows:

@The Black Book (9 pts)
@Mind Fuck (6 pts)
@Phroxen (6 pts)
@GOOD GRIEF (5 pts)
@ShotsFired™ (5 pts)
@Ghambit (4 pts)
@Unyqe (1 pts)
@GRizzEAT (0 pts)

Based on scoring the highest points, The Black Book, Mind Fuck, and Phroxen are our new FVC members. Shouts out to The Black Book for being only the third person to score a perfect 9 points since we've been having these competitions. To everyone who didn't make it, this doesn't mean you're not a fair voter. You had to be considered a fair voter to even enter this competition. You're more than welcome to apply again when we hold this competition next month.

[NOBLE]

AfterThought has given me his votes and the points have been added. You guys can hit him up if you need an expo. The final points tally is as follows:

@The Black Book (9 pts)
@Mind Fuck (6 pts)
@Phroxen (6 pts)
@GOOD GRIEF (5 pts)
@ShotsFired™ (5 pts)
@Ghambit (4 pts)
@Unyqe (1 pts)
@GRizzEAT (0 pts)

Based on scoring the highest points, The Black Book, Mind Fuck, and Phroxen are our new FVC members. Shouts out to The Black Book for being only the third person to score a perfect 9 points since we've been having these competitions. To everyone who didn't make it, this doesn't mean you're not a fair voter. You had to be considered a fair voter to even enter this competition. You're more than welcome to apply again when we hold this competition next month.

[ILLoKWENT]

@Doomsday™
@X-Calibur
@Anarchist
@EtH
FVC CONTEST JUDGES: @Just C, @OSKAR@Fayz
,



ROUND 1
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=459317


---------- Post added at 04:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:38 AM ----------

in each round, the judges will give either a long/ or short critique based on that applicants entry.. and give a ranking wit 1. being the best in that round all the way down to 4. being the least..... the person/or persons that advance to FVC member ship, will at the end of 3 rounds have the highest accumulative ranking total.. ex... if round 1 results are 1.a, 2.b, 3. c, 4.d, then round 2 results are 1.b, 2c, 3. a. 4.d, (letters represent the contestants) i will add the total of the ranks in those two rounds. so (b) would have 3pts..because 1+2=3....(a) would have 4 points because 1+3=4.. (c)=5pts. and (d)=8pts.. in this example (b) would have the lowest amount.. and whoever ends up wit the lowest points.. will gain entry.. or win the contest..the judges will pm with their critique and results, and i will post them when complete..good luck

[ILLoKWENT]

@Doomsday™
@X-Calibur
@Anarchist
@EtH
FVC CONTEST JUDGES: @Just C, @OSKAR@Fayz
,



ROUND 1
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=459317


---------- Post added at 04:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:38 AM ----------

in each round, the judges will give either a long/ or short critique based on that applicants entry.. and give a ranking wit 1. being the best in that round all the way down to 4. being the least..... the person/or persons that advance to FVC member ship, will at the end of 3 rounds have the highest accumulative ranking total.. ex... if round 1 results are 1.a, 2.b, 3. c, 4.d, then round 2 results are 1.b, 2c, 3. a. 4.d, (letters represent the contestants) i will add the total of the ranks in those two rounds. so (b) would have 3pts..because 1+2=3....(a) would have 4 points because 1+3=4.. (c)=5pts. and (d)=8pts.. in this example (b) would have the lowest amount.. and whoever ends up wit the lowest points.. will gain entry.. or win the contest..the judges will pm with their critique and results, and i will post them when complete..good luck