FVC Membership Contest Round 1 (Text)

[NOBLE]

In @BP Pride vs @~SHINIGAMI~, BP Pride used 3 comments to post his expo whereas the rules state that the voters must limit themselves to one comment. All his comments were successive and they do not violate the reasons why I included that rule in the first place. I was under the impression that there was a character limit to the comment box (I swear it seems like there used to be) but I just realize that that is no longer the case...so all 3 of his comments could have went into one comment. I didn't want people posting novels of an expo trying to win this thing. Conciseness is a virtue as well. I was also trying to avoid scenarios where voter A votes, then voter B votes and includes something that voter A didn't, then voter A wants to come back and include what voter B included in a second comment. Since BP Pride's comments were successive, it shows that that clearly wasn't his motives in expo'ing with 3 comments. Therefore, even though his action violates the rules, since they don't violate the reasons why those rules exist in the first place, I'm going to make a judgement call here and allow his vote to remain qualified.

[NOBLE]

In @BP Pride vs @~SHINIGAMI~, BP Pride used 3 comments to post his expo whereas the rules state that the voters must limit themselves to one comment. All his comments were successive and they do not violate the reasons why I included that rule in the first place. I was under the impression that there was a character limit to the comment box (I swear it seems like there used to be) but I just realize that that is no longer the case...so all 3 of his comments could have went into one comment. I didn't want people posting novels of an expo trying to win this thing. Conciseness is a virtue as well. I was also trying to avoid scenarios where voter A votes, then voter B votes and includes something that voter A didn't, then voter A wants to come back and include what voter B included in a second comment. Since BP Pride's comments were successive, it shows that that clearly wasn't his motives in expo'ing with 3 comments. Therefore, even though his action violates the rules, since they don't violate the reasons why those rules exist in the first place, I'm going to make a judgement call here and allow his vote to remain qualified.