I know ill get a great answer

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by Jason

the people battling are totally irrelevant to the voting system
why should the battlers have anything to do with how the 3rd party vote is weighed?

if a voter proves he should have a higher VP than it is granted
if he shows that he is a poor voter than it is lowered

how is this system flawed?

very simply, it assumes from jump that 2 battlers are of equal merit which might not be the case. So when thats combined with ur scaling system for voters it will unfairly scale when theres to few votes on a battle. cuz it assumes that the votes are invalid or less thanwhen in actuality there wasn't enuff votes to accurately decide. cuz in all fairness he only got one vote and i got .3 or a third of a vote so how can the system declare him the winner without 2 full votes being cast? ive never seen a battle end with one vote. so if it wasn't flawed why didn't he just get the win as soon as xanex voted for him? since the battle had been over for a while and my first vote was 0..so really a vote for me was a loss no matter what unless the vote were cast by someone with VP.. but if no one with VP voted in time any other vote for me was an auto loss. Or someone could even reverse hate voted against me and gave me the loss just cuz they have low VP... the better questions how it not flawed?

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by Jason

the people battling are totally irrelevant to the voting system
why should the battlers have anything to do with how the 3rd party vote is weighed?

if a voter proves he should have a higher VP than it is granted
if he shows that he is a poor voter than it is lowered

how is this system flawed?

very simply, it assumes from jump that 2 battlers are of equal merit which might not be the case. So when thats combined with ur scaling system for voters it will unfairly scale when theres to few votes on a battle. cuz it assumes that the votes are invalid or less thanwhen in actuality there wasn't enuff votes to accurately decide. cuz in all fairness he only got one vote and i got .3 or a third of a vote so how can the system declare him the winner without 2 full votes being cast? ive never seen a battle end with one vote. so if it wasn't flawed why didn't he just get the win as soon as xanex voted for him? since the battle had been over for a while and my first vote was 0..so really a vote for me was a loss no matter what unless the vote were cast by someone with VP.. but if no one with VP voted in time any other vote for me was an auto loss. Or someone could even reverse hate voted against me and gave me the loss just cuz they have low VP... the better questions how it not flawed?