King Titles

[BizzyOne]

Originally Posted by RULE

I thought u at least had a multi you battled on.

so wait a minute....

YOU MEAN TO TELL ME YOU BEAT ME IN ONLY YOUR 11TH AUDIO BATTLE EVER????

Im deffly coming for you now...

Lol...I actually practice alot. I just dont post audio battles as often, but what really started to piss me off was the voting system in text. Mfer on here be sayin stupid shit lol.

[BizzyOne]

Originally Posted by RULE

I thought u at least had a multi you battled on.

so wait a minute....

YOU MEAN TO TELL ME YOU BEAT ME IN ONLY YOUR 11TH AUDIO BATTLE EVER????

Im deffly coming for you now...

Lol...I actually practice alot. I just dont post audio battles as often, but what really started to piss me off was the voting system in text. Mfer on here be sayin stupid shit lol.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Punk

"30 people voted" lol....

Now you know damn well we ain't got that many members

I was half right. 15 votes lol

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Punk

"30 people voted" lol....

Now you know damn well we ain't got that many members

I was half right. 15 votes lol

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by RULE

I was half right. 15 votes lol

So glad you don't work in retail.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by RULE

I was half right. 15 votes lol

So glad you don't work in retail.

Originally Posted by 2FUEL

So glad you don't work in retail.

Haha!

Originally Posted by 2FUEL

So glad you don't work in retail.

Haha!

[RULE]

Me too. They dont pay enough

[RULE]

Me too. They dont pay enough

[Seul]

Just reading this.

I held that LBA Champion title for 230 days+ or some shit a long those lines, if none of you could come take it off me, then i'm the LBA King. To be honest, I was and should be the ONLY LBA King. RULE got his title by counting his scheme tournament battles as LBA Title defences, so he fast tracked the 230 days+ I put in, by doubling up via Scheme Tourney. I'm not cool with this at all.

To be honest, half the shit I am reading here is disrespectful as fuck, I don't know what you want me to do when I hold onto the title for that long, get wins, some no shows, and don't get the title afterwards, I actually vacated the title after King was appointed so ya'll could have a chance.

---------- Post added at 01:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:41 PM ----------

Also, for an addition.

I did WRITE for those 2 min audio battles that were no-shows, i still put in time and effort into those verses.

Oh well.

[Seul]

Just reading this.

I held that LBA Champion title for 230 days+ or some shit a long those lines, if none of you could come take it off me, then i'm the LBA King. To be honest, I was and should be the ONLY LBA King. RULE got his title by counting his scheme tournament battles as LBA Title defences, so he fast tracked the 230 days+ I put in, by doubling up via Scheme Tourney. I'm not cool with this at all.

To be honest, half the shit I am reading here is disrespectful as fuck, I don't know what you want me to do when I hold onto the title for that long, get wins, some no shows, and don't get the title afterwards, I actually vacated the title after King was appointed so ya'll could have a chance.

---------- Post added at 01:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:41 PM ----------

Also, for an addition.

I did WRITE for those 2 min audio battles that were no-shows, i still put in time and effort into those verses.

Oh well.

[RULE]

230 days ... 5 battles ... 0 audio heavyweights.

I'm not cool with that at all.

lol

[RULE]

230 days ... 5 battles ... 0 audio heavyweights.

I'm not cool with that at all.

lol

[Student]

I get that 7 (consecutive) title defenses are more impressive then 7 total title defenses BUT what's the point in keeping track of everybody's record if ultimately it's not going to matter?


If the LBA/LBT is a monthly event why not incentivize battlers with the promise of earning a permanent title if they're able to earn and defend their LBA/LBT Champion title 7 times, more then half a year?


Also I reread that thread @RULE originally made and the majority agreed that nobody should have their title stripped so that shouldn't even be in question, this should only be regarding future LBA/LBT Champions.


I think it's stupid @Celsius & @Shodan aren't qualified to, first of all, beat enough opponents to win the LBT Champion title back and defend it until they have 7 total defenses to win the LBT King title.


Also in history there's already's been multiple kings, i.e. King of England, Scotland, Ireland, France, etc. so I don't get y'alls aversions to having multiple ones.

[Student]

I get that 7 (consecutive) title defenses are more impressive then 7 total title defenses BUT what's the point in keeping track of everybody's record if ultimately it's not going to matter?


If the LBA/LBT is a monthly event why not incentivize battlers with the promise of earning a permanent title if they're able to earn and defend their LBA/LBT Champion title 7 times, more then half a year?


Also I reread that thread @RULE originally made and the majority agreed that nobody should have their title stripped so that shouldn't even be in question, this should only be regarding future LBA/LBT Champions.


I think it's stupid @Celsius & @Shodan aren't qualified to, first of all, beat enough opponents to win the LBT Champion title back and defend it until they have 7 total defenses to win the LBT King title.


Also in history there's already's been multiple kings, i.e. King of England, Scotland, Ireland, France, etc. so I don't get y'alls aversions to having multiple ones.

[Seul]

Originally Posted by RULE

230 days ... 5 battles ... 0 audio heavyweights.

I'm not cool with that at all.

lol

You ain't an audio heavyweight my friend, but how about you and me battle 2 min audio acapella for the LBA King title?

[Seul]

Originally Posted by RULE

230 days ... 5 battles ... 0 audio heavyweights.

I'm not cool with that at all.

lol

You ain't an audio heavyweight my friend, but how about you and me battle 2 min audio acapella for the LBA King title?

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Student

I get that 7 (consecutive) title defenses are more impressive then 7 total title defenses BUT what's the point in keeping track of everybody's record if ultimately it's not going to matter?


If the LBA/LBT is a monthly event why not incentivize battlers with the promise of earning a permanent title if they're able to earn and defend their LBA/LBT Champion title 7 times, more then half a year?


Also I reread that thread @RULE originally made and the majority agreed that nobody should have their title stripped so that shouldn't even be in question, this should only be regarding future LBA/LBT Champions.


I think it's stupid @Celsius & @Shodan aren't qualified to, first of all, beat enough opponents to win the LBT Champion title back and defend it until they have 7 total defenses to win the LBT King title.


Also in history there's already's been multiple kings, i.e. King of England, Scotland, Ireland, France, etc. so I don't get y'alls aversions to having multiple ones.

I think people wanted it changed to: LBA Legend / LBT Legend

Would make more sense grammatically i guess?

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Student

I get that 7 (consecutive) title defenses are more impressive then 7 total title defenses BUT what's the point in keeping track of everybody's record if ultimately it's not going to matter?


If the LBA/LBT is a monthly event why not incentivize battlers with the promise of earning a permanent title if they're able to earn and defend their LBA/LBT Champion title 7 times, more then half a year?


Also I reread that thread @RULE originally made and the majority agreed that nobody should have their title stripped so that shouldn't even be in question, this should only be regarding future LBA/LBT Champions.


I think it's stupid @Celsius & @Shodan aren't qualified to, first of all, beat enough opponents to win the LBT Champion title back and defend it until they have 7 total defenses to win the LBT King title.


Also in history there's already's been multiple kings, i.e. King of England, Scotland, Ireland, France, etc. so I don't get y'alls aversions to having multiple ones.

I think people wanted it changed to: LBA Legend / LBT Legend

Would make more sense grammatically i guess?