King Titles

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

@EtH @RULE @Rai @Malishus @Seul @Esso

I think we need some more clarity around this King shit, and I don’t wanna see Rai get done dirty like it’s shaping up to be. There was recently a thread where the Kings discussed the king titles. All the kings records were laid out. I’m not sure if clear cut new rules were ever even established BUT It was a pretty general consensus that no current king would have their title revoked.

However, now we’ve got some bullshit going down in the LBT. Since Rai doesn’t have 7 consecutive DEFENCES of the LBT title, he’s gotta “earn” his title with a win over Illo and if he loses he loses the LBT king title. This goes against what was discussed before with current kings keeping their title. Now, if we’ve changed our minds and want to enforce the 7 consecutive defences as a hard criteria? Cool. But then it’s only fair to Rai, and all other LBT and LBA kings that RULE finishes off his run.

RULE
Battle Record:
Vs Phil Banks (52%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs UNKNOWN ARTIST (70%) - Lost the LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (No Show) - LBA Title Eliminator
Vs God The Reptillian (87%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs Rican (86%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (87%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Mister Jon Flako (100%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs GRizzEAT (71%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Guts (89%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs BizzyOne (56%) - Lost the LBA Title

There’s only 5 successful consecutive defences there. If we’re making Rai put his title on the line against Illo, we’ve gotta atleast make RULE put it on the line against Seul, plus another defence. Then, we can dead the controversy once and for all around this topic and there doesn’t need to be any more of these bullshit threads (like this one).

Been there

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169149

Lets not forget i stated ages ago i was down to follow whatever the masses deemed fair.


And yeah i only have 5 successful defences in a row. Seul has only 3 unless you count no shows.

1/

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

@EtH @RULE @Rai @Malishus @Seul @Esso

I think we need some more clarity around this King shit, and I don’t wanna see Rai get done dirty like it’s shaping up to be. There was recently a thread where the Kings discussed the king titles. All the kings records were laid out. I’m not sure if clear cut new rules were ever even established BUT It was a pretty general consensus that no current king would have their title revoked.

However, now we’ve got some bullshit going down in the LBT. Since Rai doesn’t have 7 consecutive DEFENCES of the LBT title, he’s gotta “earn” his title with a win over Illo and if he loses he loses the LBT king title. This goes against what was discussed before with current kings keeping their title. Now, if we’ve changed our minds and want to enforce the 7 consecutive defences as a hard criteria? Cool. But then it’s only fair to Rai, and all other LBT and LBA kings that RULE finishes off his run.

RULE
Battle Record:
Vs Phil Banks (52%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs UNKNOWN ARTIST (70%) - Lost the LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (No Show) - LBA Title Eliminator
Vs God The Reptillian (87%) - Won the LBA Title
Vs Rican (86%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs 2FUEL (87%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Mister Jon Flako (100%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs GRizzEAT (71%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs Guts (89%) - Defended LBA Title
Vs BizzyOne (56%) - Lost the LBA Title

There’s only 5 successful consecutive defences there. If we’re making Rai put his title on the line against Illo, we’ve gotta atleast make RULE put it on the line against Seul, plus another defence. Then, we can dead the controversy once and for all around this topic and there doesn’t need to be any more of these bullshit threads (like this one).

Been there

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169149

Lets not forget i stated ages ago i was down to follow whatever the masses deemed fair.


And yeah i only have 5 successful defences in a row. Seul has only 3 unless you count no shows.

1/

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by RULE

Been there

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169149

Lets not forget i stated ages ago i was down to follow whatever the masses deemed fair.


And yeah i only have 5 successful defences in a row. Seul has only 3 unless you count no shows.

1/

Just playing devils advocate here. If we wanna get technical like this, flako was a no show. Not to mention Seuls no shows were against people who signed up and made it to the LBA title match. Your defences are in an audio scheme tournament.

Again this is all detracting from the point though that I think it’s only fair. If everyone disagrees with me? That’s fine. But the thread had to be made

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by RULE

Been there

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169149

Lets not forget i stated ages ago i was down to follow whatever the masses deemed fair.


And yeah i only have 5 successful defences in a row. Seul has only 3 unless you count no shows.

1/

Just playing devils advocate here. If we wanna get technical like this, flako was a no show. Not to mention Seuls no shows were against people who signed up and made it to the LBA title match. Your defences are in an audio scheme tournament.

Again this is all detracting from the point though that I think it’s only fair. If everyone disagrees with me? That’s fine. But the thread had to be made

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

Just playing devils advocate here. If we wanna get technical like this, flako was a no show. Not to mention Seuls, no shows were against people who signed up and made it to the LBA title match. Your defences are in an audio scheme tournament.

Again this is all detracting from the point though that I think it’s only fair. If everyone disagrees with me? That’s fine. But the thread had to be made

The thread HAS been made.

And honestly if you look at the 5 battles he had and the 8 i had its clear who had the more impressive run.

I beat Phil Banks. Thats game-set-match right there.

1/

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

Just playing devils advocate here. If we wanna get technical like this, flako was a no show. Not to mention Seuls, no shows were against people who signed up and made it to the LBA title match. Your defences are in an audio scheme tournament.

Again this is all detracting from the point though that I think it’s only fair. If everyone disagrees with me? That’s fine. But the thread had to be made

The thread HAS been made.

And honestly if you look at the 5 battles he had and the 8 i had its clear who had the more impressive run.

I beat Phil Banks. Thats game-set-match right there.

1/

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by RULE

The thread HAS been made.

And honestly if you look at the 5 battles he had and the 8 i had its clear who had the more impressive run.

I beat Phil Banks. Thats game-set-match right there.

1/

See this is part of the problem man. We STILL have no clear criteria for the shit. Rai’s gotta earn it with another defence but because you’ve beat Phil
Banks (which is a great win, that’s not my point) you just get it off that alone? Shits too inconsistent to be taken seriously

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by RULE

The thread HAS been made.

And honestly if you look at the 5 battles he had and the 8 i had its clear who had the more impressive run.

I beat Phil Banks. Thats game-set-match right there.

1/

See this is part of the problem man. We STILL have no clear criteria for the shit. Rai’s gotta earn it with another defence but because you’ve beat Phil
Banks (which is a great win, that’s not my point) you just get it off that alone? Shits too inconsistent to be taken seriously

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

See this is part of the problem man. We STILL have no clear criteria for the shit. Rai’s gotta earn it with another defence but because you’ve beat Phil
Banks (which is a great win, that’s not my point) you just get it off that alone? Shits too inconsistent to be taken seriously

You've seen the thread. I asked for peoples feedback, for clarity.

They didnt want anyone stripped so we changed it to 7 successful LBA title matches, including no shows. As thats the only criteria that allows me and Seul to keep the title.

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

See this is part of the problem man. We STILL have no clear criteria for the shit. Rai’s gotta earn it with another defence but because you’ve beat Phil
Banks (which is a great win, that’s not my point) you just get it off that alone? Shits too inconsistent to be taken seriously

You've seen the thread. I asked for peoples feedback, for clarity.

They didnt want anyone stripped so we changed it to 7 successful LBA title matches, including no shows. As thats the only criteria that allows me and Seul to keep the title.

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

I disagree with this. Me and Kiwi are probably going forward with this but youre talking about putting the legacy of something pretty dope in the hands of a non democratic decision

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

I disagree with this. Me and Kiwi are probably going forward with this but youre talking about putting the legacy of something pretty dope in the hands of a non democratic decision