nah must be the crew thing...

Originally Posted by Rieper

Pretty sure they did.

and? i think you missed my point.

Originally Posted by Rieper

Pretty sure they did.

and? i think you missed my point.

Originally Posted by Guts

and? i think you missed my point.

Pretty sure I didn't, bro.

Originally Posted by Guts

and? i think you missed my point.

Pretty sure I didn't, bro.

Originally Posted by Rieper

Pretty sure I didn't, bro.

my point was saying that if they had both worked together to attack nic, then that shows how poorly nics IRL choices were viewed.

i know you know neither one is friendly towards the other, so idk what you trying to get at.

Originally Posted by Rieper

Pretty sure I didn't, bro.

my point was saying that if they had both worked together to attack nic, then that shows how poorly nics IRL choices were viewed.

i know you know neither one is friendly towards the other, so idk what you trying to get at.

Originally Posted by Guts

my point was saying that if they had both worked together to attack nic, then that shows how poorly nics IRL choices were viewed.

i know you know neither one is friendly towards the other, so idk what you trying to get at.

What are you even talking about? Rant and Shodan didn't do it because of my "IRL choices"? They did it because they didn't like me on this site, nothing to do with real life.

The irony is you don't even know who you're trying to sway on this shit because you're talking to Lock and he had the same playbook used on him. I guess he deserved it too?

Originally Posted by Guts

my point was saying that if they had both worked together to attack nic, then that shows how poorly nics IRL choices were viewed.

i know you know neither one is friendly towards the other, so idk what you trying to get at.

What are you even talking about? Rant and Shodan didn't do it because of my "IRL choices"? They did it because they didn't like me on this site, nothing to do with real life.

The irony is you don't even know who you're trying to sway on this shit because you're talking to Lock and he had the same playbook used on him. I guess he deserved it too?

Originally Posted by Guts

my point was saying that if they had both worked together to attack nic, then that shows how poorly nics IRL choices were viewed.

i know you know neither one is friendly towards the other, so idk what you trying to get at.

Whether Nick's IRL anything is poorly viewed or not isn't what I'm getting at. You seem to be under this idea that whatever Nick did on LB somehow justified his way of making a living being jeopardized for some reason, which it clearly didn't. I get you don't like the dude, but you can't view Rant specifically fucking up his IRL business reviews as justifiable because of him being an asshole to you on here. It just doesn't work like that, and that's what it seems, to me, that you're doing.

Originally Posted by Guts

my point was saying that if they had both worked together to attack nic, then that shows how poorly nics IRL choices were viewed.

i know you know neither one is friendly towards the other, so idk what you trying to get at.

Whether Nick's IRL anything is poorly viewed or not isn't what I'm getting at. You seem to be under this idea that whatever Nick did on LB somehow justified his way of making a living being jeopardized for some reason, which it clearly didn't. I get you don't like the dude, but you can't view Rant specifically fucking up his IRL business reviews as justifiable because of him being an asshole to you on here. It just doesn't work like that, and that's what it seems, to me, that you're doing.

Originally Posted by Rieper

Whether Nick's IRL anything is poorly viewed or not isn't what I'm getting at. You seem to be under this idea that whatever Nick did on LB somehow justified his way of making a living being jeopardized for some reason, which it clearly didn't. I get you don't like the dude, but you can't view Rant specifically fucking up his IRL business reviews as justifiable because of him being an asshole to you on here. It just doesn't work like that, and that's what it seems, to me, that you're doing.

ok i got you. you're right. nothing you do on letsbeef should qualify for being exposed in real life. and if it seems like i'm promoting that i apologize.

i don't think nic is a good person, i think he is a liar, and a manipulator. but i don't actually wish him or anyone actual harm outside of lb, or even necessarily on lb either.

Originally Posted by Rieper

Whether Nick's IRL anything is poorly viewed or not isn't what I'm getting at. You seem to be under this idea that whatever Nick did on LB somehow justified his way of making a living being jeopardized for some reason, which it clearly didn't. I get you don't like the dude, but you can't view Rant specifically fucking up his IRL business reviews as justifiable because of him being an asshole to you on here. It just doesn't work like that, and that's what it seems, to me, that you're doing.

ok i got you. you're right. nothing you do on letsbeef should qualify for being exposed in real life. and if it seems like i'm promoting that i apologize.

i don't think nic is a good person, i think he is a liar, and a manipulator. but i don't actually wish him or anyone actual harm outside of lb, or even necessarily on lb either.