Need input from LB community on Voting Rules

[X]

Added minimum 100 character comment requirement to voting

[X]

Added minimum 100 character comment requirement to voting

[The Saaxxx Baba]

Originally Posted by X

Added minimum 100 character comment requirement to voting

thanks X and @Punk !! seems like a good idea to begin with.

[The Saaxxx Baba]

Originally Posted by X

Added minimum 100 character comment requirement to voting

thanks X and @Punk !! seems like a good idea to begin with.

[Shodan]

I'm going to throw out a really simple and cover-all definition that doesn't need long criteria or formulas or whatever.

For a vote to not be removed, it should have to demonstrate that you actually read the battle.

Shit like "gb fv" is not acceptable because it doesn't show that the voter even looked at the battle. If someone says things like, "I liked bar X" or "I thought Battler A's long scheme was dope" (if Battler A actually had a long scheme), then the vote can be allowed to stand.

As for biased votes or bad judgments based on ignorance, I think they should only be removed in blatant cases, and only after multiple moderators agree. The exception to the multiple moderator consensus rule would be when people outright admit to dropping hate votes/dickriding/not reading/etc.

---------- Post added at 12:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:32 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Sean Griffey

Oh fr? Lol I figured it was around 80 or some shit. But touche. Either way, I agree with the general idea. Character restriction is a +

lmao I think you were low-key confusing characters with words

[Shodan]

I'm going to throw out a really simple and cover-all definition that doesn't need long criteria or formulas or whatever.

For a vote to not be removed, it should have to demonstrate that you actually read the battle.

Shit like "gb fv" is not acceptable because it doesn't show that the voter even looked at the battle. If someone says things like, "I liked bar X" or "I thought Battler A's long scheme was dope" (if Battler A actually had a long scheme), then the vote can be allowed to stand.

As for biased votes or bad judgments based on ignorance, I think they should only be removed in blatant cases, and only after multiple moderators agree. The exception to the multiple moderator consensus rule would be when people outright admit to dropping hate votes/dickriding/not reading/etc.

---------- Post added at 12:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:32 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Sean Griffey

Oh fr? Lol I figured it was around 80 or some shit. But touche. Either way, I agree with the general idea. Character restriction is a +

lmao I think you were low-key confusing characters with words