O_G for Hall of Fame

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Godbody

What does this even mean

Nobody's arguing anything. Most people agree that O_G has put in quality work over the last decade

People like EtH come to shake shit up and make others unsure in their opinions is all. Its evident in the thread where people say one thing and in a later post waver in their opinion and show uncertainty

Let it be known I dont fuck with O_G outside of here, never even talked to the nigga. But EtH and I are more qualified than most to have a solid opinion on O_G since we've been here his entire stay. So when someone of EtH's stature/prestige on this website downplays a veteran like O_G or downplays someone's accolades period its a bad look, because it skews the opinion for niggas that have been here 4-5 yrs and shit. They can't be bothered to give O_G's shit a listen when a niggas hating so hard and convincing others he aint shit.

yet I see open battles posted and get responded to in 2 days
O_G will post an open battle and it gets a response 5 days later lol

But it's his opinion/Vote, which is what you asked for. I mean you praise his prestige and time served which only validates his vote even more. Just to downplay it at the same time as "damaging" based off what? Speculation or a hunch that he's salty and or trolling?


You ever considered that the whole terms for entry are so vague and wishy washy that someone might agree with you talentwise but that this isn't near enough for entry? I dunno like notable wins, streaks, reigns and titles ect ect ect and not just to be a dickhead.


Eth never struck me as the type to screw someone out of a vote for HoF just because he's Eth and Eth's an "Edgy" twat.



A guy who brought or tried to bring topicals to the fore and had a crew dedicated to help improve new guys which a lot of them are more than holding their own over the last few years btw and was a full on mod. . A trolly dick he might be but history suggests he doesn't take that narrow minded approach on subjects such as this, unless provoked. Like having his vote discredited because you can't get past your feelings that he's PROBALY trolling.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Godbody

What does this even mean

Nobody's arguing anything. Most people agree that O_G has put in quality work over the last decade

People like EtH come to shake shit up and make others unsure in their opinions is all. Its evident in the thread where people say one thing and in a later post waver in their opinion and show uncertainty

Let it be known I dont fuck with O_G outside of here, never even talked to the nigga. But EtH and I are more qualified than most to have a solid opinion on O_G since we've been here his entire stay. So when someone of EtH's stature/prestige on this website downplays a veteran like O_G or downplays someone's accolades period its a bad look, because it skews the opinion for niggas that have been here 4-5 yrs and shit. They can't be bothered to give O_G's shit a listen when a niggas hating so hard and convincing others he aint shit.

yet I see open battles posted and get responded to in 2 days
O_G will post an open battle and it gets a response 5 days later lol

But it's his opinion/Vote, which is what you asked for. I mean you praise his prestige and time served which only validates his vote even more. Just to downplay it at the same time as "damaging" based off what? Speculation or a hunch that he's salty and or trolling?


You ever considered that the whole terms for entry are so vague and wishy washy that someone might agree with you talentwise but that this isn't near enough for entry? I dunno like notable wins, streaks, reigns and titles ect ect ect and not just to be a dickhead.


Eth never struck me as the type to screw someone out of a vote for HoF just because he's Eth and Eth's an "Edgy" twat.



A guy who brought or tried to bring topicals to the fore and had a crew dedicated to help improve new guys which a lot of them are more than holding their own over the last few years btw and was a full on mod. . A trolly dick he might be but history suggests he doesn't take that narrow minded approach on subjects such as this, unless provoked. Like having his vote discredited because you can't get past your feelings that he's PROBALY trolling.