Battle Rap and Freestyle Battles at Lets Beef


 
Start a battle

Vote on a battle to earn +1 credit!
 
  One Bar Championships 2025
 
 
Battle Feed
Hek Teafy vs WaycoWayco is on FIRE! 15+ wins in a row!Wayco is on FIRE! 15+ wins in a row!Wayco is on FIRE! 15+ wins in a row!
8 Lines (4 Bars) Blind Drop
1 Vote 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
Codi talker vs Mr McGoo
8 Lines (4 Bars)
5 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
Slogo16z vs Phenomonon
8 Lines (4 Bars) Blind Drop
3 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
CandyLover vs Codi talker
8 Lines (4 Bars)
1 Vote 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
Codi talker vs Hek Teafy
8 Lines (4 Bars)
2 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars

[ more battles... ]
 
 

Go Back   Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums > Battle Arena > General Talk
Register Articles FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Journals

Notices

View Poll Results: Should Letsbeef be 18+?
Yes 4 28.57%
No 10 71.43%
Undecided 0 0%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display
  #1  
Unread 12-05-2018, 10:19 PM
HVK HVK is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,501
Mentioned: 730 Post(s)
Tagged: 19 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.83/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
278 Won / 31 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
3 Won / 3 Lost
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rant View Post
Regardless of the age in question, 18, 13, 25, etc, I think the underlying issue is primarily the lack of age VERIFICATION. Restrictions totally aside. As I've previously expressed, without a verification system of some sort, there's no deterrent for the data collection from minors. Which is something that the privacy policy explicitly states the site doesn't do. In order to maintain that standing, it's important that there's some determinant of the age of the members, at least to administration. Even if that verification isn't publicly available information.


Edit: I, personally, still think the site should be 18+. But, my personal opinion aside, the previous remarks do still denote a pretty gaping hole in the site's policy. Even if I were to concede from my own standing.
NAH YOU DO RAISE A VALID POINT THAT X OR NOBLE MIGHT NOT OF ACTUALLY CONSIDERED...... DEFINATELY WORTH A DISCUSSION, THA LAW MAY CHANGE SOON ANYWAY WHERE WE ''HAVE'' TO DO AGE RESTRICTIONS, SHIT CHANGES ALL THA TIME AS X RECENTLY HAD TO ADD THA INFAMOUS ''DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT'' BUTTON LMAO
__________________
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-05-2018, 10:19 PM   #1
 
HVK HVK is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Estimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 0/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.83/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.83/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
278 Won / 31 Lost
Exclusive Text Record
3 Won / 3 Lost
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Voted: 139 audio / 3320 text
Posts: 3,501
Mentioned: 730 Post(s)
Tagged: 19 Thread(s)


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rant View Post
Regardless of the age in question, 18, 13, 25, etc, I think the underlying issue is primarily the lack of age VERIFICATION. Restrictions totally aside. As I've previously expressed, without a verification system of some sort, there's no deterrent for the data collection from minors. Which is something that the privacy policy explicitly states the site doesn't do. In order to maintain that standing, it's important that there's some determinant of the age of the members, at least to administration. Even if that verification isn't publicly available information.


Edit: I, personally, still think the site should be 18+. But, my personal opinion aside, the previous remarks do still denote a pretty gaping hole in the site's policy. Even if I were to concede from my own standing.
NAH YOU DO RAISE A VALID POINT THAT X OR NOBLE MIGHT NOT OF ACTUALLY CONSIDERED...... DEFINATELY WORTH A DISCUSSION, THA LAW MAY CHANGE SOON ANYWAY WHERE WE ''HAVE'' TO DO AGE RESTRICTIONS, SHIT CHANGES ALL THA TIME AS X RECENTLY HAD TO ADD THA INFAMOUS ''DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT'' BUTTON LMAO
__________________
Offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

 

[ LetsBeef Instagram | LetsBeef Facebook | LetsBeef Twitter | LetsBeef Youtube | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FAQ | Contact Support ]
Some members of the public may use explicit lyrics in the performance of their art, so please be advised that such language, if any, may not be appropriate for minors.
Graphics by Pixel Dreams · Site © 2025 LetsBeef.com
 
no new posts