Would you participate in a crew draft/league?

Originally Posted by Rant

AC's isn't the only crew. Your inactivity is inherently, then, inconsequential to the foundation of the premise.

If AC's were the only crew, then this limit would not affect voting. But, because ACs is one of multiple crews, a universal limit to crews propagates the growth of the voting pool.

Now you're going to deflect onto other crews. Anbu, Red Ribbon and Apoc each have less than 9 active members contributing to the site. So unless you continue to give massive weight to inactive people who's inclusion in a crew is entirely irrelevant to your foundation, ALL of the current crews are well within the guidelines laid out.

Why must we reshuffle our members if we already fit all the needed criteria?

Originally Posted by Rant

AC's isn't the only crew. Your inactivity is inherently, then, inconsequential to the foundation of the premise.

If AC's were the only crew, then this limit would not affect voting. But, because ACs is one of multiple crews, a universal limit to crews propagates the growth of the voting pool.

Now you're going to deflect onto other crews. Anbu, Red Ribbon and Apoc each have less than 9 active members contributing to the site. So unless you continue to give massive weight to inactive people who's inclusion in a crew is entirely irrelevant to your foundation, ALL of the current crews are well within the guidelines laid out.

Why must we reshuffle our members if we already fit all the needed criteria?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Now you're going to deflect onto other crews. Anbu, Red Ribbon and Apoc each have less than 9 active members contributing to the site. So unless you continue to give massive weight to inactive people who's inclusion in a crew is entirely irrelevant to your foundation, ALL of the current crews are well within the guidelines laid out.

Why must we reshuffle our members if we already fit all the needed criteria?

The only "guideline" laid out was "6-9 members in a crew."

How many members are in ACs?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Now you're going to deflect onto other crews. Anbu, Red Ribbon and Apoc each have less than 9 active members contributing to the site. So unless you continue to give massive weight to inactive people who's inclusion in a crew is entirely irrelevant to your foundation, ALL of the current crews are well within the guidelines laid out.

Why must we reshuffle our members if we already fit all the needed criteria?

The only "guideline" laid out was "6-9 members in a crew."

How many members are in ACs?

Originally Posted by Rant

The only "guideline" laid out was "6-9 members in a crew."

How many members are in ACs?

If your overall arch and entire purpose is that you want more diversity and options in the voting...but the only thing you actually demand is that all 4 crews release their inactive members (as that's all that would happen) how does that have any bearing on improving voting?

Is it really worth creating an entire crew draft just on the off chance that Phenomonon and Letum decide to return to activity at some undetermined point in the future?

Originally Posted by Rant

The only "guideline" laid out was "6-9 members in a crew."

How many members are in ACs?

If your overall arch and entire purpose is that you want more diversity and options in the voting...but the only thing you actually demand is that all 4 crews release their inactive members (as that's all that would happen) how does that have any bearing on improving voting?

Is it really worth creating an entire crew draft just on the off chance that Phenomonon and Letum decide to return to activity at some undetermined point in the future?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

If your overall arch and entire purpose is that you want more diversity and options in the voting...but the only thing you actually demand is that all 4 crews release their inactive members (as that's all that would happen) how does that have any bearing on improving voting?

Is it really worth creating an entire crew draft just on the off chance that Phenomonon and Letum decide to return to activity at some undetermined point in the future?

But, how many members are in ACs?

It's a simple question, Eth. You said yourself, you fell within the laid out "guideline." You wouldn't be trying to dance around the fact that that's a blatant lie, or anything, right?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

If your overall arch and entire purpose is that you want more diversity and options in the voting...but the only thing you actually demand is that all 4 crews release their inactive members (as that's all that would happen) how does that have any bearing on improving voting?

Is it really worth creating an entire crew draft just on the off chance that Phenomonon and Letum decide to return to activity at some undetermined point in the future?

But, how many members are in ACs?

It's a simple question, Eth. You said yourself, you fell within the laid out "guideline." You wouldn't be trying to dance around the fact that that's a blatant lie, or anything, right?

Originally Posted by Rant

But, how many members are in ACs?

It's a simple question, Eth. You said yourself, you fell within the laid out "guideline." You wouldn't be trying to dance around the fact that that's a blatant lie, or anything, right?

It's a rhetorical question as you have previously already posted the number of members in this thread.

So is it safe to say that your overall jist is that you want ACs and other crews to remove their inactive members...and as they would then fit into these "guidelines"...do absolutely nothing else?

Originally Posted by Rant

But, how many members are in ACs?

It's a simple question, Eth. You said yourself, you fell within the laid out "guideline." You wouldn't be trying to dance around the fact that that's a blatant lie, or anything, right?

It's a rhetorical question as you have previously already posted the number of members in this thread.

So is it safe to say that your overall jist is that you want ACs and other crews to remove their inactive members...and as they would then fit into these "guidelines"...do absolutely nothing else?