Would you participate in a crew draft/league?

Originally Posted by Rant

What about those 60 votes from APOC, though, who are all active? If they have to kick members to meet a limit, you should to. It's that simple.

Well it's a good thing they don't have to then eh?

Originally Posted by Rant

What about those 60 votes from APOC, though, who are all active? If they have to kick members to meet a limit, you should to. It's that simple.

Well it's a good thing they don't have to then eh?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Well it's a good thing they don't have to then eh?

They should have to, though. And a lot of the people in your crew seem to agree. Lol.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Well it's a good thing they don't have to then eh?

They should have to, though. And a lot of the people in your crew seem to agree. Lol.

Originally Posted by Rant

They should have to, though. And a lot of the people in your crew seem to agree. Lol.

But your point is one of function. There are definitely personal reasons for ACs to perhaps attempt to remove some inactive members. But if your point is that Apoc has too many crew members so ACs has to release inactive members, it doesn't really add up.

Originally Posted by Rant

They should have to, though. And a lot of the people in your crew seem to agree. Lol.

But your point is one of function. There are definitely personal reasons for ACs to perhaps attempt to remove some inactive members. But if your point is that Apoc has too many crew members so ACs has to release inactive members, it doesn't really add up.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

But your point is one of function. There are definitely personal reasons for ACs to perhaps attempt to remove some inactive members. But if your point is that Apoc has too many crew members so ACs has to release inactive members, it doesn't really add up.

The point is that activity doesn't determine membership. Being a member in the crew does.

The premise: Crew's should be limited to 6-9 members.

Not: 6-9 active members.

Because activity isn't definite, nor is inactivity. An inactive member has the capacity to become active, this would then supersede the initially defined limit in the supposed hypothetical.

ALL of the crews have too many members. Yours included.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

But your point is one of function. There are definitely personal reasons for ACs to perhaps attempt to remove some inactive members. But if your point is that Apoc has too many crew members so ACs has to release inactive members, it doesn't really add up.

The point is that activity doesn't determine membership. Being a member in the crew does.

The premise: Crew's should be limited to 6-9 members.

Not: 6-9 active members.

Because activity isn't definite, nor is inactivity. An inactive member has the capacity to become active, this would then supersede the initially defined limit in the supposed hypothetical.

ALL of the crews have too many members. Yours included.

Originally Posted by Rant

The point is that activity doesn't determine membership. Being a member in the crew does.

The premise: Crew's should be limited to 6-9 members.

Not: 6-9 active members.

Because activity isn't definite, nor is inactivity. An inactive member has the capacity to become active, this would then supersede the initially defined limit in the supposed hypothetical.

ALL of the crews have too many members. Yours included.

Activity effects voting though, which is the entire foundation of your thread. If the point isn't to improve the overall site and to help voting, then what exactly is the point? Cutting 8 inactive members from ACs does NOTHING to improve LB.

Originally Posted by Rant

The point is that activity doesn't determine membership. Being a member in the crew does.

The premise: Crew's should be limited to 6-9 members.

Not: 6-9 active members.

Because activity isn't definite, nor is inactivity. An inactive member has the capacity to become active, this would then supersede the initially defined limit in the supposed hypothetical.

ALL of the crews have too many members. Yours included.

Activity effects voting though, which is the entire foundation of your thread. If the point isn't to improve the overall site and to help voting, then what exactly is the point? Cutting 8 inactive members from ACs does NOTHING to improve LB.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Activity effects voting though, which is the entire foundation of your thread. If the point isn't to improve the overall site and to help voting, then what exactly is the point? Cutting 8 inactive members from ACs does NOTHING to improve LB.

AC's isn't the only crew. Your inactivity is inherently, then, inconsequential to the foundation of the premise.

If AC's were the only crew, then this limit would not affect voting. But, because ACs is one of multiple crews, a universal limit to crews propagates the growth of the voting pool. As, not only as previously expressed, inactivity is not definite, meaning it can change over time. Thus introducing these members to the voting pool. But, also because it introduces the other active members of the other crews into the voting pool as well.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Activity effects voting though, which is the entire foundation of your thread. If the point isn't to improve the overall site and to help voting, then what exactly is the point? Cutting 8 inactive members from ACs does NOTHING to improve LB.

AC's isn't the only crew. Your inactivity is inherently, then, inconsequential to the foundation of the premise.

If AC's were the only crew, then this limit would not affect voting. But, because ACs is one of multiple crews, a universal limit to crews propagates the growth of the voting pool. As, not only as previously expressed, inactivity is not definite, meaning it can change over time. Thus introducing these members to the voting pool. But, also because it introduces the other active members of the other crews into the voting pool as well.

Originally Posted by Rant

AC's isn't the only crew. Your inactivity is inherently, then, inconsequential to the foundation of the premise.

If AC's were the only crew, then this limit would not affect voting. But, because ACs is one of multiple crews, a universal limit to crews propagates the growth of the voting pool.

Now you're going to deflect onto other crews. Anbu, Red Ribbon and Apoc each have less than 9 active members contributing to the site. So unless you continue to give massive weight to inactive people who's inclusion in a crew is entirely irrelevant to your foundation, ALL of the current crews are well within the guidelines laid out.

Why must we reshuffle our members if we already fit all the needed criteria?

Originally Posted by Rant

AC's isn't the only crew. Your inactivity is inherently, then, inconsequential to the foundation of the premise.

If AC's were the only crew, then this limit would not affect voting. But, because ACs is one of multiple crews, a universal limit to crews propagates the growth of the voting pool.

Now you're going to deflect onto other crews. Anbu, Red Ribbon and Apoc each have less than 9 active members contributing to the site. So unless you continue to give massive weight to inactive people who's inclusion in a crew is entirely irrelevant to your foundation, ALL of the current crews are well within the guidelines laid out.

Why must we reshuffle our members if we already fit all the needed criteria?