Would you participate in a crew draft/league?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

This idea works when you have 3 crews full of vets. But who makes up the crews now? Anbu is full of new guys. Apoc is full of new guys. ACs is mostly filled with relatively new guys. It's not like MFD where everyone was consolidated in one place.

A draft takes people who are typically "vets" and drafts members amongst the crews. Right now, you have let's just say for talking save that it's me and Lock running ACs from the "older head" perspective, Row and Punk in Anbu and HVK and X-Cal in Apoc. ACs has Malishus and Aggo as it's only other "old timey vets".

Outside of those crews, you have Rant, Shodan and maybe one or two more. What exactly is stopping you guys from making a proper crew? If you want to lead crews, go and do it. ACs, Anbu, Apoc and Red Ribbon are picking up new members to the site, and trying to build them up. We're not out there exclusively picking up veterans. You, Shodan and whoever else can pick up a brand new 1-0 member, build up a crew, and compete like the rest of us.

There aren't enough "vets" on the site for your argument to be valid. The crew numbers are inhibiting voting. That's what this primarily comes down to. They should be restricted because of it. If the number should already be restricted, why not use that restriction as an opportunity to build something new and fun for the site? This has nothing to do with "vets" or "noobs." It has to do with the sheer volume of members in crews, with the stagnating membership growth of the site.

Also, AC's is riddled with "vet" accounts, if we do go that direction. Not that I believe crew drafts are inherently linked to the number of vets in a crew. But, if it were, half of your crew are "vets."

Lockhart.
Aggo.
Malishus.
Eth.
Dirty Work.
M-Rock.
Dysfunctional.
Rai.
Peaceful.
Freek.
Enfinite.
Letum.

These are all "vet" accounts, in that they've been on the site for a long period of time, and have somewhat of a reputation adhered to their name. Mind you, some of these people are inactive. But, that doesn't change the fact that they're "vets." And subsequently add rationale to a draft from your own perspective.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

This idea works when you have 3 crews full of vets. But who makes up the crews now? Anbu is full of new guys. Apoc is full of new guys. ACs is mostly filled with relatively new guys. It's not like MFD where everyone was consolidated in one place.

A draft takes people who are typically "vets" and drafts members amongst the crews. Right now, you have let's just say for talking save that it's me and Lock running ACs from the "older head" perspective, Row and Punk in Anbu and HVK and X-Cal in Apoc. ACs has Malishus and Aggo as it's only other "old timey vets".

Outside of those crews, you have Rant, Shodan and maybe one or two more. What exactly is stopping you guys from making a proper crew? If you want to lead crews, go and do it. ACs, Anbu, Apoc and Red Ribbon are picking up new members to the site, and trying to build them up. We're not out there exclusively picking up veterans. You, Shodan and whoever else can pick up a brand new 1-0 member, build up a crew, and compete like the rest of us.

There aren't enough "vets" on the site for your argument to be valid. The crew numbers are inhibiting voting. That's what this primarily comes down to. They should be restricted because of it. If the number should already be restricted, why not use that restriction as an opportunity to build something new and fun for the site? This has nothing to do with "vets" or "noobs." It has to do with the sheer volume of members in crews, with the stagnating membership growth of the site.

Also, AC's is riddled with "vet" accounts, if we do go that direction. Not that I believe crew drafts are inherently linked to the number of vets in a crew. But, if it were, half of your crew are "vets."

Lockhart.
Aggo.
Malishus.
Eth.
Dirty Work.
M-Rock.
Dysfunctional.
Rai.
Peaceful.
Freek.
Enfinite.
Letum.

These are all "vet" accounts, in that they've been on the site for a long period of time, and have somewhat of a reputation adhered to their name. Mind you, some of these people are inactive. But, that doesn't change the fact that they're "vets." And subsequently add rationale to a draft from your own perspective.

Originally Posted by Rant

There aren't enough "vets" on the site for your argument to be valid. The crew numbers are inhibiting voting. That's what this primarily comes down to. They should be restricted because of it. If the number should already be restricted, why not use that restriction as an opportunity to build something new and fun for the site? This has nothing to do with "vets" or "noobs." It has to do with the sheer volume of members in crews, with the stagnating membership growth of the site.

Also, AC's is riddled with "vet" accounts, if we do go that direction. Not that I believe crew drafts are inherently linked to the number of vets in a crew. But, if it were, half of your crew are "vets."

Lockhart.
Aggo.
Malishus.
Eth.
Dirty Work.
M-Rock.
Dysfunctional.
Rai.
Peaceful.
Freek.
Enfinite.
Letum.

These are all "vet" accounts, in that they've been on the site for a long period of time, and have somewhat of a reputation adhered to their name. Mind you, some of these people are inactive. But, that doesn't change the fact that they're "vets." And subsequently add rationale to a draft from your own perspective.

If there aren't enough vets then who's running the crews? You want quality voting, and if you're sitting in a bullshit crew with Bnas you don't contribute towards that.

Dirty Work - Doesn't vote.
M-Rock - Doesn't vote.
Dysfunctional - Doesn't vote.
Peaceful - Doesn't vote.
Freek - Doesn't vote.
Enfinite - Doesn't vote.
Letum - Doesn't vote.

How exactly is their inclusion in ACs hindering voting?

Originally Posted by Rant

There aren't enough "vets" on the site for your argument to be valid. The crew numbers are inhibiting voting. That's what this primarily comes down to. They should be restricted because of it. If the number should already be restricted, why not use that restriction as an opportunity to build something new and fun for the site? This has nothing to do with "vets" or "noobs." It has to do with the sheer volume of members in crews, with the stagnating membership growth of the site.

Also, AC's is riddled with "vet" accounts, if we do go that direction. Not that I believe crew drafts are inherently linked to the number of vets in a crew. But, if it were, half of your crew are "vets."

Lockhart.
Aggo.
Malishus.
Eth.
Dirty Work.
M-Rock.
Dysfunctional.
Rai.
Peaceful.
Freek.
Enfinite.
Letum.

These are all "vet" accounts, in that they've been on the site for a long period of time, and have somewhat of a reputation adhered to their name. Mind you, some of these people are inactive. But, that doesn't change the fact that they're "vets." And subsequently add rationale to a draft from your own perspective.

If there aren't enough vets then who's running the crews? You want quality voting, and if you're sitting in a bullshit crew with Bnas you don't contribute towards that.

Dirty Work - Doesn't vote.
M-Rock - Doesn't vote.
Dysfunctional - Doesn't vote.
Peaceful - Doesn't vote.
Freek - Doesn't vote.
Enfinite - Doesn't vote.
Letum - Doesn't vote.

How exactly is their inclusion in ACs hindering voting?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

If there aren't enough vets then who's running the crews? You want quality voting, and if you're sitting in a bullshit crew with Bnas you don't contribute towards that.

Dirty Work - Doesn't vote.
M-Rock - Doesn't vote.
Dysfunctional - Doesn't vote.
Peaceful - Doesn't vote.
Freek - Doesn't vote.
Enfinite - Doesn't vote.
Letum - Doesn't vote.

How exactly is their inclusion in ACs hindering voting?

Let's say we start a draft with 5 crews. You're telling me there aren't 5 people to lead those crews? The point is, crew drafts are totally unrelated to "vets." You don't need to be a "vet" to run a crew. You don't need to be a "vet" to be a good voter. Your argument is a nonsequitur.

There are 16 people in your crew Eth. Most of whom are active voters(Freek included, I see you Freek. Shouts.)

Why would you want those 16 people to miss out on the opportunity for them to contribute to the site more wholly by being able to vote in higher numbers, and have higher numbers of votes on their battles? In a time when battles are struggling to get 5 votes, your forcing your crew members to miss out on 15 potential more votes with the sheer mass of your crew.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

If there aren't enough vets then who's running the crews? You want quality voting, and if you're sitting in a bullshit crew with Bnas you don't contribute towards that.

Dirty Work - Doesn't vote.
M-Rock - Doesn't vote.
Dysfunctional - Doesn't vote.
Peaceful - Doesn't vote.
Freek - Doesn't vote.
Enfinite - Doesn't vote.
Letum - Doesn't vote.

How exactly is their inclusion in ACs hindering voting?

Let's say we start a draft with 5 crews. You're telling me there aren't 5 people to lead those crews? The point is, crew drafts are totally unrelated to "vets." You don't need to be a "vet" to run a crew. You don't need to be a "vet" to be a good voter. Your argument is a nonsequitur.

There are 16 people in your crew Eth. Most of whom are active voters(Freek included, I see you Freek. Shouts.)

Why would you want those 16 people to miss out on the opportunity for them to contribute to the site more wholly by being able to vote in higher numbers, and have higher numbers of votes on their battles? In a time when battles are struggling to get 5 votes, your forcing your crew members to miss out on 15 potential more votes with the sheer mass of your crew.

Originally Posted by Rant

Let's say we start a draft with 5 crews. You're telling me there aren't 5 people to lead those crews? The point is, crew drafts are totally unrelated to "vets." You don't need to be a "vet" to run a crew. You don't need to be a "vet" to be a good voter. Your argument is a nonsequitur.

There are 16 people in your crew Eth. Most of whom are active voters(Freek included, I see you Freek. Shouts.)

Why would you want those 16 people to miss out on the opportunity for them to contribute to the site more wholly by being able to vote in higher numbers, and have higher numbers of votes on their battles? In a time when battles are struggling to get 5 votes, your forcing your crew members to miss out on 15 potential more votes with the sheer mass of your crew.

ACs, Apoc, Anbu, Red Ribbon Army, the crew Rant works to build instead of having people drafted for him.

5 crews. Sorted. Why draft?

Most of whom are active voters? We have 8 active people in the crew. I'm not sure about FreeK cause dude just appeared there haha. That's HALF of the entire crew.

If you care about site contribution, go and make a crew, pick up those brand new 0-1 battlers and train them into valuable voters. In other words, do what the other 4 active crews are doing.

Originally Posted by Rant

Let's say we start a draft with 5 crews. You're telling me there aren't 5 people to lead those crews? The point is, crew drafts are totally unrelated to "vets." You don't need to be a "vet" to run a crew. You don't need to be a "vet" to be a good voter. Your argument is a nonsequitur.

There are 16 people in your crew Eth. Most of whom are active voters(Freek included, I see you Freek. Shouts.)

Why would you want those 16 people to miss out on the opportunity for them to contribute to the site more wholly by being able to vote in higher numbers, and have higher numbers of votes on their battles? In a time when battles are struggling to get 5 votes, your forcing your crew members to miss out on 15 potential more votes with the sheer mass of your crew.

ACs, Apoc, Anbu, Red Ribbon Army, the crew Rant works to build instead of having people drafted for him.

5 crews. Sorted. Why draft?

Most of whom are active voters? We have 8 active people in the crew. I'm not sure about FreeK cause dude just appeared there haha. That's HALF of the entire crew.

If you care about site contribution, go and make a crew, pick up those brand new 0-1 battlers and train them into valuable voters. In other words, do what the other 4 active crews are doing.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

ACs, Apoc, Anbu, Red Ribbon Army, the crew Rant works to build instead of having people drafted for him.

5 crews. Sorted. Why draft?

Most of whom are active voters? We have 8 active people in the crew. I'm not sure about FreeK cause dude just appeared there haha. That's HALF of the entire crew.

If you care about site contribution, go and make a crew, pick up those brand new 0-1 battlers and train them into valuable voters. In other words, do what the other 4 active crews are doing.

Why hoard members, to continue to exacerbate a worsening stagnation in voting?

Edit: To answer your question, because a draft would be new. And it would shake things up. And it might incite some competition in the crew ranks. And because crews with fewer members means more voters.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

ACs, Apoc, Anbu, Red Ribbon Army, the crew Rant works to build instead of having people drafted for him.

5 crews. Sorted. Why draft?

Most of whom are active voters? We have 8 active people in the crew. I'm not sure about FreeK cause dude just appeared there haha. That's HALF of the entire crew.

If you care about site contribution, go and make a crew, pick up those brand new 0-1 battlers and train them into valuable voters. In other words, do what the other 4 active crews are doing.

Why hoard members, to continue to exacerbate a worsening stagnation in voting?

Edit: To answer your question, because a draft would be new. And it would shake things up. And it might incite some competition in the crew ranks. And because crews with fewer members means more voters.

Originally Posted by Rant

Why hoard members, to continue to exacerbate a worsening stagnation in voting?

Edit: To answer your question, because a draft would be new. And it would shak things up. And it might incite some competition in the crew ranks. And because crews with fewer members means more voters.

You want 5 crews with fewer members. Where do the other members go? How do new members on the site get an opportunity?

Why can't there be competition now? In the next two months, ACs hopes to have had 3 separate crew battles. Why can't those compete?

Originally Posted by Rant

Why hoard members, to continue to exacerbate a worsening stagnation in voting?

Edit: To answer your question, because a draft would be new. And it would shak things up. And it might incite some competition in the crew ranks. And because crews with fewer members means more voters.

You want 5 crews with fewer members. Where do the other members go? How do new members on the site get an opportunity?

Why can't there be competition now? In the next two months, ACs hopes to have had 3 separate crew battles. Why can't those compete?