My apologies - Page 2 - Lets Beef

**Seul** · #11 03-05-2018, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant

Having seen Shodan in positions of power on discord, and having noted his previous runs in staff on LB(as a forum moderator.) I could not disagree more. A.) He was negligent of his duties previously as a forum mod. B.) He's not against using his moderator powers for his own amusement.(Much like myself.) So, expect name changes, and forum post edits, and other general misuses "for the lulz."

Idk, I think Sho would be a good mod.

**Seul** · 03-05-2018, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant

Having seen Shodan in positions of power on discord, and having noted his previous runs in staff on LB(as a forum moderator.) I could not disagree more. A.) He was negligent of his duties previously as a forum mod. B.) He's not against using his moderator powers for his own amusement.(Much like myself.) So, expect name changes, and forum post edits, and other general misuses "for the lulz."

Idk, I think Sho would be a good mod.

**Student** · #12 03-05-2018, 03:03 PM

60 Hours is a week sounds horrible but if you gotta hu$tle then hu$tle first and foremost. Livelihood first, hobbies second or third, etc.

**Student** · 03-05-2018, 03:03 PM

60 Hours is a week sounds horrible but if you gotta hu$tle then hu$tle first and foremost. Livelihood first, hobbies second or third, etc.

#13 03-05-2018, 03:44 PM

No offense, but how would anyone else have continued the ATT in place of NOBLE? He was the only one who knew the identities of the participants.

03-05-2018, 03:44 PM

No offense, but how would anyone else have continued the ATT in place of NOBLE? He was the only one who knew the identities of the participants.

**Shodan** · #14 03-05-2018, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant

A.) He was negligent of his duties previously as a forum mod. B.) He's not against using his moderator powers for his own amusement.(Much like myself.) So, expect name changes, and forum post edits, and other general misuses "for the lulz."

A.) Bullshit. I was the TOPICAL MODERATOR, which is borderline meaningless. I was tasked with running a section which was utterly fucking dead, when the site was at a serious low of activity. What did you expect me to do? Revive it? I doubt that anyone on the site could have done that. I made a legitimate effort at first but gave up soon because I knew that it was a pointless task.

B.) You're right. I'm not against using my moderator powers for my own amusement - on Discord channels where that sort of shit is harmless and expected. If you think that on LB, I would change people's usernames, ban them, or give them negative usertitles for laughs, you're sorely mistaken and don't understand me at all.

**Shodan** · 03-05-2018, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rant

A.) He was negligent of his duties previously as a forum mod. B.) He's not against using his moderator powers for his own amusement.(Much like myself.) So, expect name changes, and forum post edits, and other general misuses "for the lulz."

A.) Bullshit. I was the TOPICAL MODERATOR, which is borderline meaningless. I was tasked with running a section which was utterly fucking dead, when the site was at a serious low of activity. What did you expect me to do? Revive it? I doubt that anyone on the site could have done that. I made a legitimate effort at first but gave up soon because I knew that it was a pointless task.

B.) You're right. I'm not against using my moderator powers for my own amusement - on Discord channels where that sort of shit is harmless and expected. If you think that on LB, I would change people's usernames, ban them, or give them negative usertitles for laughs, you're sorely mistaken and don't understand me at all.

#15 03-05-2018, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shodan

A.) Bullshit. I was the TOPICAL MODERATOR, which is borderline meaningless. I was tasked with running a section which was utterly fucking dead, when the site was at a serious low of activity. What did you expect me to do? Revive it? I doubt that anyone on the site could have done that. I made a legitimate effort at first but gave up soon because I knew that it was a pointless task.

B.) You're right. I'm not against using my moderator powers for my own amusement - on Discord channels where that sort of shit is harmless and expected. If you think that on LB, I would change people's usernames, ban them, or give them negative usertitles for laughs, you're sorely mistaken and don't understand me at all.

The site is at a low point in activity now, if you gave up on a position used to gauge whether you should be mod at such a point, why should you be trusted with a higher position, now, under similar circumstances?

When did I mention negative user titles, or banning people? You can only give user titles as an admin. But, it shows that it's something you've thought of doing. Lending merit to my original thinking.

03-05-2018, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shodan

A.) Bullshit. I was the TOPICAL MODERATOR, which is borderline meaningless. I was tasked with running a section which was utterly fucking dead, when the site was at a serious low of activity. What did you expect me to do? Revive it? I doubt that anyone on the site could have done that. I made a legitimate effort at first but gave up soon because I knew that it was a pointless task.

B.) You're right. I'm not against using my moderator powers for my own amusement - on Discord channels where that sort of shit is harmless and expected. If you think that on LB, I would change people's usernames, ban them, or give them negative usertitles for laughs, you're sorely mistaken and don't understand me at all.

The site is at a low point in activity now, if you gave up on a position used to gauge whether you should be mod at such a point, why should you be trusted with a higher position, now, under similar circumstances?

When did I mention negative user titles, or banning people? You can only give user titles as an admin. But, it shows that it's something you've thought of doing. Lending merit to my original thinking.

KG The Prince · #16 03-05-2018, 06:06 PM

on Discord channels where that sort of shit is harmless and expected. - THAT IS SOOOOO FUCKING TRUE

---------- Post added at 11:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:04 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brayne Ded

No offense, but how would anyone else have continued the ATT in place of NOBLE? He was the only one who knew the identities of the participants.

OH MY GOD, no one realised that (except for you, you clever bastid

)

KG The Prince · 03-05-2018, 06:06 PM

on Discord channels where that sort of shit is harmless and expected. - THAT IS SOOOOO FUCKING TRUE

---------- Post added at 11:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:04 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brayne Ded

No offense, but how would anyone else have continued the ATT in place of NOBLE? He was the only one who knew the identities of the participants.

OH MY GOD, no one realised that (except for you, you clever bastid

)

**Shodan** · #17 03-05-2018, 06:08 PM

"The site is at a low point in activity now, if you gave up on a position used to gauge whether you should be mod at such a point, why should you be trusted with a higher position, now, under similar circumstances?"

If you're going to attempt to character assassinate me based on my admittedly bad performance as topical moderator, realize that I was tasked with doing a job that didn't exist. On the other hand, as a full moderator, I would actually have nontrivial responsibilities to attend to.

"You can only give user titles as an admin. But, it shows that it's something you've thought of doing."

No it doesn't. I thought of that because it's been done before, like with the Hall of Shame. You're right about mods not being able to give out usertitles, though. I had forgotten about that.

**Shodan** · 03-05-2018, 06:08 PM

"The site is at a low point in activity now, if you gave up on a position used to gauge whether you should be mod at such a point, why should you be trusted with a higher position, now, under similar circumstances?"

If you're going to attempt to character assassinate me based on my admittedly bad performance as topical moderator, realize that I was tasked with doing a job that didn't exist. On the other hand, as a full moderator, I would actually have nontrivial responsibilities to attend to.

"You can only give user titles as an admin. But, it shows that it's something you've thought of doing."

No it doesn't. I thought of that because it's been done before, like with the Hall of Shame. You're right about mods not being able to give out usertitles, though. I had forgotten about that.

#18 03-05-2018, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shodan

"The site is at a low point in activity now, if you gave up on a position used to gauge whether you should be mod at such a point, why should you be trusted with a higher position, now, under similar circumstances?"

If you're going to attempt to character assassinate me based on my admittedly bad performance as topical moderator, realize that I was tasked with doing a job that didn't exist. On the other hand, as a full moderator, I would actually have nontrivial responsibilities to attend to.

"You can only give user titles as an admin. But, it shows that it's something you've thought of doing."

No it doesn't. I thought of that because it's been done before, like with the Hall of Shame. You're right about mods not being able to give out usertitles, though. I had forgotten about that.

It did exist. You were the mod of it.

03-05-2018, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shodan

"The site is at a low point in activity now, if you gave up on a position used to gauge whether you should be mod at such a point, why should you be trusted with a higher position, now, under similar circumstances?"

If you're going to attempt to character assassinate me based on my admittedly bad performance as topical moderator, realize that I was tasked with doing a job that didn't exist. On the other hand, as a full moderator, I would actually have nontrivial responsibilities to attend to.

"You can only give user titles as an admin. But, it shows that it's something you've thought of doing."

No it doesn't. I thought of that because it's been done before, like with the Hall of Shame. You're right about mods not being able to give out usertitles, though. I had forgotten about that.

It did exist. You were the mod of it.

**Student** · #19 03-07-2018, 02:30 PM

Ay a LOT of wacky people have been a mod, it doesn't take a genius to change a name, re-rank battles and ban people, but the interest to help, that isn't always there.

People who get into it for the wrong reasons are the ones who just fuck around but trust that some people are still putting work in. Shoutout @NOBLE & @Aggo

**Student** · 03-07-2018, 02:30 PM

Ay a LOT of wacky people have been a mod, it doesn't take a genius to change a name, re-rank battles and ban people, but the interest to help, that isn't always there.

People who get into it for the wrong reasons are the ones who just fuck around but trust that some people are still putting work in. Shoutout @NOBLE & @Aggo