Letsbeef Text Rankings - Page 2 - Lets Beef

#11 12-31-2017, 08:31 AM

Throwe me in, boss.

12-31-2017, 08:31 AM

Throwe me in, boss.

**HIGHpothasis** · #12 12-31-2017, 10:22 AM

*Raises Hand*

DT, just Stfu Bro. Lmao. Ur Absolute Trash.

**HIGHpothasis** · 12-31-2017, 10:22 AM

*Raises Hand*

DT, just Stfu Bro. Lmao. Ur Absolute Trash.

**NOBLE** · #13 12-31-2017, 10:29 AM

If you used an ELO formula to calculate the points, then how often people battle wouldn't matter as much towards their rankings.

**NOBLE** · 12-31-2017, 10:29 AM

If you used an ELO formula to calculate the points, then how often people battle wouldn't matter as much towards their rankings.

#14 12-31-2017, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOBLE

If you used an ELO formula to calculate the points, then how often people battle wouldn't matter as much towards their rankings.

Reading the Wiki page this looks complex. How easy would implementation be?

12-31-2017, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOBLE

If you used an ELO formula to calculate the points, then how often people battle wouldn't matter as much towards their rankings.

Reading the Wiki page this looks complex. How easy would implementation be?

**NOBLE** · #15 12-31-2017, 11:16 AM

I can send you a spreadsheet with the formulas already precalculated. All you'd have to do is enter the respective battlers' current rankings and signify who won or lost and it will calculate their new rankings. ELO or Glicko (modified ELO) also considers RD (ratings deviation) which is like standard deviation in statistics. You can give everyone a provisional rating based on how you'd rank them, then their RD changes based on the number of battles they've completed. RD pretty much determines how much their ratings will swing by a win or loss. The idea is that the more battles they have had in order to reach their current rating, the more accurate the rating is considered. Just let me find the spreadsheet first and you can have a look at it.

**NOBLE** · 12-31-2017, 11:16 AM

I can send you a spreadsheet with the formulas already precalculated. All you'd have to do is enter the respective battlers' current rankings and signify who won or lost and it will calculate their new rankings. ELO or Glicko (modified ELO) also considers RD (ratings deviation) which is like standard deviation in statistics. You can give everyone a provisional rating based on how you'd rank them, then their RD changes based on the number of battles they've completed. RD pretty much determines how much their ratings will swing by a win or loss. The idea is that the more battles they have had in order to reach their current rating, the more accurate the rating is considered. Just let me find the spreadsheet first and you can have a look at it.

**Subreal** · #16 12-31-2017, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOBLE

I can send you a spreadsheet with the formulas already precalculated. All you'd have to do is enter the respective battlers' current rankings and signify who won or lost and it will calculate their new rankings. ELO or Glicko (modified ELO) also considers RD (ratings deviation) which is like standard deviation in statistics. You can give everyone a provisional rating based on how you'd rank them, then their RD changes based on the number of battles they've completed. RD pretty much determines how much their ratings will swing by a win or loss. The idea is that the more battles they have had in order to reach their current rating, the more accurate the rating is considered. Just let me find the spreadsheet first and you can have a look at it.

Or this should just be coded into the site as a whole..

**Subreal** · 12-31-2017, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOBLE

I can send you a spreadsheet with the formulas already precalculated. All you'd have to do is enter the respective battlers' current rankings and signify who won or lost and it will calculate their new rankings. ELO or Glicko (modified ELO) also considers RD (ratings deviation) which is like standard deviation in statistics. You can give everyone a provisional rating based on how you'd rank them, then their RD changes based on the number of battles they've completed. RD pretty much determines how much their ratings will swing by a win or loss. The idea is that the more battles they have had in order to reach their current rating, the more accurate the rating is considered. Just let me find the spreadsheet first and you can have a look at it.

Or this should just be coded into the site as a whole..

#17 12-31-2017, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOBLE

I can send you a spreadsheet with the formulas already precalculated. All you'd have to do is enter the respective battlers' current rankings and signify who won or lost and it will calculate their new rankings. ELO or Glicko (modified ELO) also considers RD (ratings deviation) which is like standard deviation in statistics. You can give everyone a provisional rating based on how you'd rank them, then their RD changes based on the number of battles they've completed. RD pretty much determines how much their ratings will swing by a win or loss. The idea is that the more battles they have had in order to reach their current rating, the more accurate the rating is considered. Just let me find the spreadsheet first and you can have a look at it.

Yes please. Would love to see this.

12-31-2017, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOBLE

I can send you a spreadsheet with the formulas already precalculated. All you'd have to do is enter the respective battlers' current rankings and signify who won or lost and it will calculate their new rankings. ELO or Glicko (modified ELO) also considers RD (ratings deviation) which is like standard deviation in statistics. You can give everyone a provisional rating based on how you'd rank them, then their RD changes based on the number of battles they've completed. RD pretty much determines how much their ratings will swing by a win or loss. The idea is that the more battles they have had in order to reach their current rating, the more accurate the rating is considered. Just let me find the spreadsheet first and you can have a look at it.

Yes please. Would love to see this.

**Subreal** · #18 12-31-2017, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MACC

*Raises Hand*

DT, just Stfu Bro. Lmao. Ur Absolute Trash.

LMAO you are lightweight in this list too

**Subreal** · 12-31-2017, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MACC

*Raises Hand*

DT, just Stfu Bro. Lmao. Ur Absolute Trash.

LMAO you are lightweight in this list too

**HIGHpothasis** · #19 12-31-2017, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subreal

LMAO you are lightweight in this list too

You Love Me. Hahahah

**HIGHpothasis** · 12-31-2017, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subreal

LMAO you are lightweight in this list too

You Love Me. Hahahah

**Shodan** · #20 12-31-2017, 02:34 PM

Sign me up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subreal

Or this should just be coded into the site as a whole..

You have a Computer Science degree, don't you? I bet you could write a script to download the result of every text battle (slowly, so it doesn't overload the server), then calculate the ELO ratings for every member based off of that.

**Shodan** · 12-31-2017, 02:34 PM

Sign me up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subreal

Or this should just be coded into the site as a whole..

You have a Computer Science degree, don't you? I bet you could write a script to download the result of every text battle (slowly, so it doesn't overload the server), then calculate the ELO ratings for every member based off of that.


	Start a battle Audio or Text or Video Vote on a battle to earn +1 credit!