Should non-staff members be able to have 3+ VP?

I agree with this. It doesn't make sense for mods to have double the vp of the sites best non staff voters.

I agree with this. It doesn't make sense for mods to have double the vp of the sites best non staff voters.

Originally Posted by Aggo

I agree with this. It doesn't make sense for mods to have double the vp of the sites best non staff voters.

My suggestion would be to drop staff VP's to 3 and have all other member's on a scale of 0 - 3. That way staff are equally weighted with the best voters on the site.

Originally Posted by Rain Matrix 2017

Nah not you this was a while back. Nigga would forum beef me , and vote against me on all my battles


Point is , they're right. Ur not a bad voter , but u got too much power. If it's a close one , it pretty much comes down to whoever u want to win

As above. There's no point in complaining about a staff member from years ago though, it has no relevancy to now.

Originally Posted by Aggo

I agree with this. It doesn't make sense for mods to have double the vp of the sites best non staff voters.

My suggestion would be to drop staff VP's to 3 and have all other member's on a scale of 0 - 3. That way staff are equally weighted with the best voters on the site.

Originally Posted by Rain Matrix 2017

Nah not you this was a while back. Nigga would forum beef me , and vote against me on all my battles


Point is , they're right. Ur not a bad voter , but u got too much power. If it's a close one , it pretty much comes down to whoever u want to win

As above. There's no point in complaining about a staff member from years ago though, it has no relevancy to now.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

My suggestion would be to drop staff VP's to 3 and have all other member's on a scale of 0 - 3. That way staff are equally weighted with the best voters on the site.

Being a member of staff doesnt mean your a top voter though. We've had plenty of mods / admins over the years who were terrible voters,

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

My suggestion would be to drop staff VP's to 3 and have all other member's on a scale of 0 - 3. That way staff are equally weighted with the best voters on the site.

Being a member of staff doesnt mean your a top voter though. We've had plenty of mods / admins over the years who were terrible voters,

Originally Posted by RULE

Being a member of staff doesnt mean your a top voter though. We've had plenty of mods / admins over the years who were terrible voters,

I agree but it seems like the most actionable solution, having mods on a slideable VP scale would cause all kinds of conflict among the staff team.

Originally Posted by RULE

Being a member of staff doesnt mean your a top voter though. We've had plenty of mods / admins over the years who were terrible voters,

I agree but it seems like the most actionable solution, having mods on a slideable VP scale would cause all kinds of conflict among the staff team.

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I agree but it seems like the most actionable solution, having mods on a slideable VP scale would cause all kinds of conflict among the staff team.

All the more reason there should be a universal scale for VP. As opposed to selective elevated VP.

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I agree but it seems like the most actionable solution, having mods on a slideable VP scale would cause all kinds of conflict among the staff team.

All the more reason there should be a universal scale for VP. As opposed to selective elevated VP.

Originally Posted by Rant

All the more reason there should be a universal scale for VP. As opposed to selective elevated VP.

You've lost me. Why is the likelihood of conflict on staff a benefit?

Originally Posted by Rant

All the more reason there should be a universal scale for VP. As opposed to selective elevated VP.

You've lost me. Why is the likelihood of conflict on staff a benefit?

Originally Posted by Nicholas

You've lost me. Why is the likelihood of conflict on staff a benefit?

Why would the staff being of the same VP as regular members cause conflict between them?

---------- Post added at 03:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:20 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Bleu

If you think everyone should be at the same vp you're dumb and I don't like you

I mean on an upward scale. Lowering VP =/= Raising VP.

Originally Posted by Nicholas

You've lost me. Why is the likelihood of conflict on staff a benefit?

Why would the staff being of the same VP as regular members cause conflict between them?

---------- Post added at 03:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:20 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Bleu

If you think everyone should be at the same vp you're dumb and I don't like you

I mean on an upward scale. Lowering VP =/= Raising VP.