LBT Championship - Independence Greats '14

[AfterThought]

@Rant It's not takin long.. lol

EDIT: Fuel you do know its not only based on records right?

[AfterThought]

@Rant It's not takin long.. lol

EDIT: Fuel you do know its not only based on records right?

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by AfterThought

@Rant It's not takin long.. lol

EDIT: Fuel you do know its not only based on records right?

What's it based on then? Popularity? lol... whats the point of having records/people doing so many battles if someone comes in an does one/two battles an skips ahead for a #1 contenders shot while the others have been duking it out longer then them?

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by AfterThought

@Rant It's not takin long.. lol

EDIT: Fuel you do know its not only based on records right?

What's it based on then? Popularity? lol... whats the point of having records/people doing so many battles if someone comes in an does one/two battles an skips ahead for a #1 contenders shot while the others have been duking it out longer then them?

[AfterThought]

Originally Posted by 2FUEL

What's it based on then? Popularity? lol... whats the point of having records/people doing so many battles if someone comes in an does one/two battles an skips ahead for a #1 contenders shot while the others have been ducking it out longer then them?

It's based on the strength of certain battlers, their past battles, the margin they beat their opponents by.
Why else you think @Wizdumb got a #1 contender shot with a record of 1-0?

If it's based on only records I could just get my 5 next battles with easy opponents.

I'm not sayin it should be me, just sayin that's not how it's done. Look at actual battle leagues.

[AfterThought]

Originally Posted by 2FUEL

What's it based on then? Popularity? lol... whats the point of having records/people doing so many battles if someone comes in an does one/two battles an skips ahead for a #1 contenders shot while the others have been ducking it out longer then them?

It's based on the strength of certain battlers, their past battles, the margin they beat their opponents by.
Why else you think @Wizdumb got a #1 contender shot with a record of 1-0?

If it's based on only records I could just get my 5 next battles with easy opponents.

I'm not sayin it should be me, just sayin that's not how it's done. Look at actual battle leagues.

[GOOD GRIEF]

Originally Posted by 2FUEL

What's it based on then? Popularity? lol... whats the point of having records/people doing so many battles if someone comes in an does one/two battles an skips ahead for a #1 contenders shot while the others have been duking it out longer then them?

Well the only person with a decent record on here is @Enfinite and Fidel who I won against so AT LEAST consider @AfterThought vs Enfinite. Gotta Do sum... we need good matches for next month.

[GOOD GRIEF]

Originally Posted by 2FUEL

What's it based on then? Popularity? lol... whats the point of having records/people doing so many battles if someone comes in an does one/two battles an skips ahead for a #1 contenders shot while the others have been duking it out longer then them?

Well the only person with a decent record on here is @Enfinite and Fidel who I won against so AT LEAST consider @AfterThought vs Enfinite. Gotta Do sum... we need good matches for next month.