Religious conversation

Originally Posted by Crysis

Surely you don't base your opinions on what someone said that something "appears" to be, Row..

The eye is a perfect example of the beaks in the finches mentioned withinin my OP, a beneficial complex part of the body created by the genes and DNA of our ancestors. Are you then saying that the Finch analogy is inherently inaccurate? If so, please share how so we can further discuss this.

"All complex shit in the earth was made by a designer"

That's a perfectly valid opinion for you to have, all you have to do now is demonstrate it or any logical thinking person will see you as uninformed. So far you've demonstrated your side of the argument with something a random dude said the eye "appeared" to be. I'm sure you see just how shaky that argument is..

its not just someone, or a random dude, its an advocate of evolution seeing flaws in his theory

Originally Posted by Crysis

Surely you don't base your opinions on what someone said that something "appears" to be, Row..

The eye is a perfect example of the beaks in the finches mentioned withinin my OP, a beneficial complex part of the body created by the genes and DNA of our ancestors. Are you then saying that the Finch analogy is inherently inaccurate? If so, please share how so we can further discuss this.

"All complex shit in the earth was made by a designer"

That's a perfectly valid opinion for you to have, all you have to do now is demonstrate it or any logical thinking person will see you as uninformed. So far you've demonstrated your side of the argument with something a random dude said the eye "appeared" to be. I'm sure you see just how shaky that argument is..

its not just someone, or a random dude, its an advocate of evolution seeing flaws in his theory