Nobles and Savages: Sun God's Riddle

[Iron Mike]

Originally Posted by Enfinite

You could also say the complete flip. The third man might have been too far to hear the first, but he may have heard the second make the remark about the first, and the claim the second made about being a noble. The third man can very well be a noble, and the first two savages.

I'm not arguing who's a Noble and who's a Savage yet. You're right...it could be either combination (until we apply logic), but my argument is they're not all of the same tribe.

[Iron Mike]

Originally Posted by Enfinite

You could also say the complete flip. The third man might have been too far to hear the first, but he may have heard the second make the remark about the first, and the claim the second made about being a noble. The third man can very well be a noble, and the first two savages.

I'm not arguing who's a Noble and who's a Savage yet. You're right...it could be either combination (until we apply logic), but my argument is they're not all of the same tribe.

just realized a flaw in my thinking.

just realized a flaw in my thinking.

:grass:

Originally Posted by Enfinite

You could also say the complete flip. The third man might have been too far to hear the first, but he may have heard the second make the remark about the first, and the claim the second made about being a noble. The third man can very well be a noble, and the first two savages.

And you did say the third man answered friendly. Where there was no context of how the first two answered. Since Nobles are kind you could assume the third one was truly a noble lol. I dunno.

"He said he was a noble." was the remark. Not that he WAS a noble.

:grass:

Originally Posted by Enfinite

You could also say the complete flip. The third man might have been too far to hear the first, but he may have heard the second make the remark about the first, and the claim the second made about being a noble. The third man can very well be a noble, and the first two savages.

And you did say the third man answered friendly. Where there was no context of how the first two answered. Since Nobles are kind you could assume the third one was truly a noble lol. I dunno.

"He said he was a noble." was the remark. Not that he WAS a noble.

if savages always lie, and nobles always tell the truth than the first person had to say 'im a noble' because no one would ever claim to be a savage. That means the second guy is also telling the truth, he said hes a noble, I am also a noble. Therefore the 3rd man is lying. I would still eat him.

if savages always lie, and nobles always tell the truth than the first person had to say 'im a noble' because no one would ever claim to be a savage. That means the second guy is also telling the truth, he said hes a noble, I am also a noble. Therefore the 3rd man is lying. I would still eat him.

[Iron Mike]

Originally Posted by Barfight

If the 3rd man is telling the truth than the second man is lying about himself, not noble. th esecond man is also lying about what the first man said so the first man said he was not noble.

no one will ever say they are not noble, because you will either tell the truth, noble. or lie about not being not noble. Noble.

The 2nd man has to be lying. so if he is lying he is not noble, he is also lying about the first man being noble.

the 3rd man is telling the truth. I would eat him.

Why do you say the second man has to be lying?

---------- Post added at 08:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Barfight

if savages always lie, and nobles always tell the truth than the first person had to say 'im a noble' because no one would ever claim to be a savage. That means the second guy is also telling the truth, he said hes a noble, I am also a noble. Therefore the 3rd man is lying. I would still eat him.

Good thinking!

[Iron Mike]

Originally Posted by Barfight

If the 3rd man is telling the truth than the second man is lying about himself, not noble. th esecond man is also lying about what the first man said so the first man said he was not noble.

no one will ever say they are not noble, because you will either tell the truth, noble. or lie about not being not noble. Noble.

The 2nd man has to be lying. so if he is lying he is not noble, he is also lying about the first man being noble.

the 3rd man is telling the truth. I would eat him.

Why do you say the second man has to be lying?

---------- Post added at 08:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Barfight

if savages always lie, and nobles always tell the truth than the first person had to say 'im a noble' because no one would ever claim to be a savage. That means the second guy is also telling the truth, he said hes a noble, I am also a noble. Therefore the 3rd man is lying. I would still eat him.

Good thinking!

revised

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:28 PM ----------

Thank you, now if you could make me an "LBs Smartest" tag we would be even steven.

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:30 PM ----------

not gonna lie though, I made a lil stick figure island drawing to help me work through this.

revised

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:28 PM ----------

Thank you, now if you could make me an "LBs Smartest" tag we would be even steven.

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:30 PM ----------

not gonna lie though, I made a lil stick figure island drawing to help me work through this.

[Iron Mike]

Originally Posted by Barfight

revised

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:28 PM ----------

Thank you, now if you could make me an "LBs Smartest" tag we would be even steven.

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:30 PM ----------

not gonna lie though, I made a lil stick figure island drawing to help me work through this.

I can make the tag, but someone else will have to install it.

---------- Post added at 08:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:31 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Nocky ~RRR~

all 3 are savages.

Why do you say that?

[Iron Mike]

Originally Posted by Barfight

revised

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:28 PM ----------

Thank you, now if you could make me an "LBs Smartest" tag we would be even steven.

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:30 PM ----------

not gonna lie though, I made a lil stick figure island drawing to help me work through this.

I can make the tag, but someone else will have to install it.

---------- Post added at 08:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:31 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Nocky ~RRR~

all 3 are savages.

Why do you say that?

Originally Posted by Barfight

revised

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:28 PM ----------

Thank you, now if you could make me an "LBs Smartest" tag we would be even steven.

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:30 PM ----------

not gonna lie though, I made a lil stick figure island drawing to help me work through this.

I still do not understand how my obscure thinking led me to the logical answer.

Originally Posted by Barfight

revised

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:28 PM ----------

Thank you, now if you could make me an "LBs Smartest" tag we would be even steven.

---------- Post added at 08:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:30 PM ----------

not gonna lie though, I made a lil stick figure island drawing to help me work through this.

I still do not understand how my obscure thinking led me to the logical answer.

Deal
@RULE (obviously savage)

---------- Post added at 08:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Jack Herer

I still do not understand how my obscure thinking led me to the logical answer.

Well BLNK, thats whats called a gut instinct. Apparently the size of the gut correlates to the size of the instinct.

Deal
@RULE (obviously savage)

---------- Post added at 08:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Jack Herer

I still do not understand how my obscure thinking led me to the logical answer.

Well BLNK, thats whats called a gut instinct. Apparently the size of the gut correlates to the size of the instinct.

[Iron Mike]

^^^LOL!

[Iron Mike]

^^^LOL!