Here's an Idea

[Godbody]

@Just C"fix everything we got and then aim higher"

but then you say money isnt an issue

if money wasn't an issue you could throw a couple thousand at a team of freelancers (some coders have teams of people that split the work) and tell em "fix everything we got and aim higher"

a few days, weeks, w/e amount of downtime

boom boom nigga...site is back, more functional than ever, and more features than before

[Godbody]

@Just C"fix everything we got and then aim higher"

but then you say money isnt an issue

if money wasn't an issue you could throw a couple thousand at a team of freelancers (some coders have teams of people that split the work) and tell em "fix everything we got and aim higher"

a few days, weeks, w/e amount of downtime

boom boom nigga...site is back, more functional than ever, and more features than before

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Godbody

@Just C"fix everything we got and then aim higher"

but then you say money isnt an issue

if money wasn't an issue you could throw a couple thousand at a team of freelancers (some coders have teams of people that split the work) and tell em "fix everything we got and aim higher"

a few days, weeks, w/e amount of downtime

boom boom nigga...site is back, more functional than ever, and more features than before

Are you actually going to read and take in what I'm saying or am I just wasting my time.

I done told you that money isn;t an issue. That shit is getting fixed.

Focus is on THAT priority. YOU'VE complained about these issues.

They're being fixed. Your idea is down the pecking order.

Your idea doesn't just magically happen and generate income to FIX THE SITE. It needs income and time invested in the first place anyway. Money and time currently invested in fixing the site.

What do you think the easter bunny is just gonna magically make this a site feature?

Another big bang and a waive of a wand?

No. So it isn't even a solution to fixing the sites problems which are already being fixed. It just delays that which is already being addressed.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Godbody

@Just C"fix everything we got and then aim higher"

but then you say money isnt an issue

if money wasn't an issue you could throw a couple thousand at a team of freelancers (some coders have teams of people that split the work) and tell em "fix everything we got and aim higher"

a few days, weeks, w/e amount of downtime

boom boom nigga...site is back, more functional than ever, and more features than before

Are you actually going to read and take in what I'm saying or am I just wasting my time.

I done told you that money isn;t an issue. That shit is getting fixed.

Focus is on THAT priority. YOU'VE complained about these issues.

They're being fixed. Your idea is down the pecking order.

Your idea doesn't just magically happen and generate income to FIX THE SITE. It needs income and time invested in the first place anyway. Money and time currently invested in fixing the site.

What do you think the easter bunny is just gonna magically make this a site feature?

Another big bang and a waive of a wand?

No. So it isn't even a solution to fixing the sites problems which are already being fixed. It just delays that which is already being addressed.

[Godbody]

Originally Posted by Just C

Are you actually going to read and take in what I'm saying or am I just wasting my time.

I done told you that money isn;t an issue. That shit is getting fixed.

Focus is on THAT priority. YOU'VE complained about these issues.

They're being fixed. Your idea is down the pecking order.

Your idea doesn't just magically happen and generate income to FIX THE SITE. It needs income and time invested in the first place anyway. Money and time currently invested in fixing the site.

What do you think the easter bunny is just gonna magically make this a site feature?

Another big bang and a waive of a wand?

No. So it isn't even a solution to fixing the sites problems which are already being fixed. It just delays that which is already being addressed.

Let me combine Dave's view on the game analogy with your view on it

Adding a feature would be like adding DLC to a game that needs patching, right?

But people have to buy the game for there to be DLC. If people didn't buy the game, or its DLC, the game publisher (EA if we're using your FIFA analogy) wouldn't see a need to make more FIFA games because they have a sunk cost; in other words they spent money on creating a product and didn't get the return they expected

Money isn't the issue, EA has tons of money to add features in their yearly installments and to patch their games

But without the financial support or feedback from the community EA would discontinue FIFA

So think of V4 as the next FIFA game. People want the next FIFA game and we're letting @Pugz(EA in this case) know that we want it by giving feedback on what he can do to improve the FIFA franchise and by giving financial support. Even though we now know money isn't an issue for Pugz and it wouldn't be an issue for EA either.

[Godbody]

Originally Posted by Just C

Are you actually going to read and take in what I'm saying or am I just wasting my time.

I done told you that money isn;t an issue. That shit is getting fixed.

Focus is on THAT priority. YOU'VE complained about these issues.

They're being fixed. Your idea is down the pecking order.

Your idea doesn't just magically happen and generate income to FIX THE SITE. It needs income and time invested in the first place anyway. Money and time currently invested in fixing the site.

What do you think the easter bunny is just gonna magically make this a site feature?

Another big bang and a waive of a wand?

No. So it isn't even a solution to fixing the sites problems which are already being fixed. It just delays that which is already being addressed.

Let me combine Dave's view on the game analogy with your view on it

Adding a feature would be like adding DLC to a game that needs patching, right?

But people have to buy the game for there to be DLC. If people didn't buy the game, or its DLC, the game publisher (EA if we're using your FIFA analogy) wouldn't see a need to make more FIFA games because they have a sunk cost; in other words they spent money on creating a product and didn't get the return they expected

Money isn't the issue, EA has tons of money to add features in their yearly installments and to patch their games

But without the financial support or feedback from the community EA would discontinue FIFA

So think of V4 as the next FIFA game. People want the next FIFA game and we're letting @Pugz(EA in this case) know that we want it by giving feedback on what he can do to improve the FIFA franchise and by giving financial support. Even though we now know money isn't an issue for Pugz and it wouldn't be an issue for EA either.