Religious conversation

Originally Posted by Dean

First of all, the lack of a case for evolution is clear from the fact that no one has ever seen it happen.

Evolutionary geneticists have often experimented on fruit flies and other rapidly reproducing species to induce mutational changes hoping they would lead to new and better species, but these have all failed to accomplish their goal. No truly new species has ever been produced, let alone a new "basic kind."

Peppered Moths have evolved right in front of us - http://www.mothscount.org/text/63/pe...selection.html

Damn flies won't mutate... Oh wait, the Curly Winged Fly bred in captivity for exotic animal food?! Huh!?



---------- Post added at 10:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:42 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Row

@Crysis , read your post, and to answer that question, evolution has many holes for it to be accepted, even Darwin acknowledged that

Please enlighten us. Darwin was afraid of ridicule by religious nutjobs.

Originally Posted by Dean

First of all, the lack of a case for evolution is clear from the fact that no one has ever seen it happen.

Evolutionary geneticists have often experimented on fruit flies and other rapidly reproducing species to induce mutational changes hoping they would lead to new and better species, but these have all failed to accomplish their goal. No truly new species has ever been produced, let alone a new "basic kind."

Peppered Moths have evolved right in front of us - http://www.mothscount.org/text/63/pe...selection.html

Damn flies won't mutate... Oh wait, the Curly Winged Fly bred in captivity for exotic animal food?! Huh!?



---------- Post added at 10:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:42 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Row

@Crysis , read your post, and to answer that question, evolution has many holes for it to be accepted, even Darwin acknowledged that

Please enlighten us. Darwin was afraid of ridicule by religious nutjobs.