Perma Ban Battles - Lets Beef

**Óðinn** · #1 04-29-2012, 12:45 PM

As it is @Mindless has already said these are NOT allowed, im pretty sure @Pugz will listen to his Admin staff before he listen to his Mod staff.

They are nothing but an unfair way of getting someone banned, as ppl will dick ride/buddy vote (call it w/e the fuck you like) to get one member perma banned from the site. It's unjust & complete and utter fucking nonsense.

Why fellow members of staff are still encouraging them after the higher up's have already said these are NOT to happen is beyond me.

Guess its to hide the fact someone done this before with out concent?

**Óðinn** · 04-29-2012, 12:45 PM

As it is @Mindless has already said these are NOT allowed, im pretty sure @Pugz will listen to his Admin staff before he listen to his Mod staff.

They are nothing but an unfair way of getting someone banned, as ppl will dick ride/buddy vote (call it w/e the fuck you like) to get one member perma banned from the site. It's unjust & complete and utter fucking nonsense.

Why fellow members of staff are still encouraging them after the higher up's have already said these are NOT to happen is beyond me.

Guess its to hide the fact someone done this before with out concent?

**Revan** · #2 04-29-2012, 02:06 PM

If two people both agree to the ban stipulation theres absolutely no reason it shouldnt be allowed.

Letsbeef.com lets not forget the name. IF both people agree theres no reason at all we shouldnt honour that.

Quote:

Guess its to hide the fact someone done this before with out concent?

Why you keep playing subliminals? Name names lol.

No one forces another to agree to a ban battle, but let them have the freedom to do so damn.

You've gotten mad anal fueler lol.

**Revan** · 04-29-2012, 02:06 PM

If two people both agree to the ban stipulation theres absolutely no reason it shouldnt be allowed.

Letsbeef.com lets not forget the name. IF both people agree theres no reason at all we shouldnt honour that.

Quote:

Guess its to hide the fact someone done this before with out concent?

Why you keep playing subliminals? Name names lol.

No one forces another to agree to a ban battle, but let them have the freedom to do so damn.

You've gotten mad anal fueler lol.

**Óðinn** · #3 04-29-2012, 03:47 PM

Ban Battles will NEVER be a fair result as ppl will just vote to get one person removed from the site.

The whole fucking concept of them is fucking Bullshit as well... all it is, is another way for ppl to look big in the forums. "Oh you won't accept? hahah i told him didn't i?" just fucking battle, i mean whats happened to the actual "pride" of beating someone in a battle?

**Óðinn** · 04-29-2012, 03:47 PM

Ban Battles will NEVER be a fair result as ppl will just vote to get one person removed from the site.

The whole fucking concept of them is fucking Bullshit as well... all it is, is another way for ppl to look big in the forums. "Oh you won't accept? hahah i told him didn't i?" just fucking battle, i mean whats happened to the actual "pride" of beating someone in a battle?

**Krhyme Killz** · #4 04-29-2012, 04:08 PM

smh...question...if we dont agree with it, how could a user get another user permabanned? lol...they can do it all they want as long as staff doesnt oblige

**Krhyme Killz** · 04-29-2012, 04:08 PM

smh...question...if we dont agree with it, how could a user get another user permabanned? lol...they can do it all they want as long as staff doesnt oblige

**Just C** · #5 04-29-2012, 04:31 PM

I agree with Fuel tbh. Purely because .... I mean look at it this way. If Mac battles Vitriol in a ban battle. There is noway the majority of voters who know what's at stake are going to vote in Maccs favour even if he did by some miracle drop a winning verse. Yes, we'd like to think voters are 100% honest 100% of the time but in reality that isn't the case and to think otherwise would be naive. I'm not saying everyone is like that but certainly enough to effect the out come.

---------- Post added at 04:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:28 PM ----------

But tbh I don't even know why it has gotten to this point. I said yesterday that Macc wouldn't agree to ban battle and that's exactly what happened.

---------- Post added at 04:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:30 PM ----------

P.S

This thread seems like a pissing contest

**Just C** · 04-29-2012, 04:31 PM

I agree with Fuel tbh. Purely because .... I mean look at it this way. If Mac battles Vitriol in a ban battle. There is noway the majority of voters who know what's at stake are going to vote in Maccs favour even if he did by some miracle drop a winning verse. Yes, we'd like to think voters are 100% honest 100% of the time but in reality that isn't the case and to think otherwise would be naive. I'm not saying everyone is like that but certainly enough to effect the out come.

---------- Post added at 04:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:28 PM ----------

But tbh I don't even know why it has gotten to this point. I said yesterday that Macc wouldn't agree to ban battle and that's exactly what happened.

---------- Post added at 04:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:30 PM ----------

P.S

This thread seems like a pissing contest

**Revan** · #6 04-29-2012, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just €

I agree with Fuel tbh. Purely because .... I mean look at it this way. If Mac battles Vitriol in a ban battle. There is noway the majority of voters who know what's at stake are going to vote in Maccs favour even if he did by some miracle drop a winning verse. Yes, we'd like to think voters are 100% honest 100% of the time but in reality that isn't the case and to think otherwise would be naive. I'm not saying everyone is like that but certainly enough to effect the out come.

If two people agree they do so at there own risks. They know what there letting themselves in for.

**Revan** · 04-29-2012, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just €

I agree with Fuel tbh. Purely because .... I mean look at it this way. If Mac battles Vitriol in a ban battle. There is noway the majority of voters who know what's at stake are going to vote in Maccs favour even if he did by some miracle drop a winning verse. Yes, we'd like to think voters are 100% honest 100% of the time but in reality that isn't the case and to think otherwise would be naive. I'm not saying everyone is like that but certainly enough to effect the out come.

If two people agree they do so at there own risks. They know what there letting themselves in for.

**Pugz** · #7 04-29-2012, 05:30 PM

Bans.. especially perma bans.. are a last resort tool to use... and should be ONLY used if the persons breaks rule on LB.. We will NOT honour those who want their accounts perma banned for any other reason... Facts are.. Bans are not asked for.. They are a punishment.. If they want their account Deleted.. its a different story.. Anyone can ask at any time for their account to be deleted... But they will lose everything and it will never be reinstated... And they will have to submit the request to Support@letsbeef.com and wait in line for it to be done like everyone else... We will not fill these kinds of request on a whim..

**Pugz** · 04-29-2012, 05:30 PM

Bans.. especially perma bans.. are a last resort tool to use... and should be ONLY used if the persons breaks rule on LB.. We will NOT honour those who want their accounts perma banned for any other reason... Facts are.. Bans are not asked for.. They are a punishment.. If they want their account Deleted.. its a different story.. Anyone can ask at any time for their account to be deleted... But they will lose everything and it will never be reinstated... And they will have to submit the request to Support@letsbeef.com and wait in line for it to be done like everyone else... We will not fill these kinds of request on a whim..

**Revan** · #8 04-30-2012, 06:49 AM

We can permaban people in seconds, if two people are both willing to put there accounts on the line why shouldnt they be allowed to?

Battling with stakes adds excitement and its not like we get many of these. In fact i can only think of one permaban battle going down since 2009.

& that was a hyped ass battle too.

**Revan** · 04-30-2012, 06:49 AM

We can permaban people in seconds, if two people are both willing to put there accounts on the line why shouldnt they be allowed to?

Battling with stakes adds excitement and its not like we get many of these. In fact i can only think of one permaban battle going down since 2009.

& that was a hyped ass battle too.

**Pugz** · #9 04-30-2012, 03:00 PM

Cuz like i said.. Bans are NOT requested.. they are handed out against the persons will as a punishment... I will never fill a request like that... Like i said if they want.. I can delete their account... But they have to request it to support@letsbeef.com.... And they will loose everything.... (loosing everything is higher stakes than a ban anyway)... I dont want to turn this into a regular thing.. So im strongly advising against it... And id appreciate that if it does go down that it not be posted in LB news as I am not supporting it...

**Pugz** · 04-30-2012, 03:00 PM

Cuz like i said.. Bans are NOT requested.. they are handed out against the persons will as a punishment... I will never fill a request like that... Like i said if they want.. I can delete their account... But they have to request it to support@letsbeef.com.... And they will loose everything.... (loosing everything is higher stakes than a ban anyway)... I dont want to turn this into a regular thing.. So im strongly advising against it... And id appreciate that if it does go down that it not be posted in LB news as I am not supporting it...

**Revan** · #10 04-30-2012, 03:06 PM

So a account deletion battle would be allowed under extreme circumstances? Cuz i got my eyes on Lizman tbh LOL.

**Revan** · 04-30-2012, 03:06 PM

So a account deletion battle would be allowed under extreme circumstances? Cuz i got my eyes on Lizman tbh LOL.


	Start a battle Audio or Text or Video Vote on a battle to earn +1 credit!