|

04-29-2012, 12:45 PM
|
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 12,790,240
Mentioned: 2452 Post(s)
Tagged: 114 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 31 Won / 3 Lost
Ranked Text Record 439 Won / 75 Lost
|
Perma Ban Battles
As it is @ Mindless has already said these are NOT allowed, im pretty sure @ Pugz will listen to his Admin staff before he listen to his Mod staff.
They are nothing but an unfair way of getting someone banned, as ppl will dick ride/buddy vote (call it w/e the fuck you like) to get one member perma banned from the site. It's unjust & complete and utter fucking nonsense.
Why fellow members of staff are still encouraging them after the higher up's have already said these are NOT to happen is beyond me.
Guess its to hide the fact someone done this before with out concent?
__________________
_____________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohs
i replied to 14 year old battles to bring back cats who aint around no more
|
|
04-29-2012, 12:45 PM
|
#1
|
Ranked Audio Record 31 Won / 3 Lost
Ranked Text Record 439 Won / 75 Lost
Join Date: Dec 1969
Voted:
531
audio / 3221
text
Posts: 12,790,240
Mentioned: 2452 Post(s)
Tagged: 114 Thread(s)
|
Perma Ban Battles
As it is @ Mindless has already said these are NOT allowed, im pretty sure @ Pugz will listen to his Admin staff before he listen to his Mod staff.
They are nothing but an unfair way of getting someone banned, as ppl will dick ride/buddy vote (call it w/e the fuck you like) to get one member perma banned from the site. It's unjust & complete and utter fucking nonsense.
Why fellow members of staff are still encouraging them after the higher up's have already said these are NOT to happen is beyond me.
Guess its to hide the fact someone done this before with out concent?
__________________
_____________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohs
i replied to 14 year old battles to bring back cats who aint around no more
|
|
Offline
|
|

04-29-2012, 02:06 PM
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,926
Mentioned: 1635 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 99 Won / 0 Lost
|
If two people both agree to the ban stipulation theres absolutely no reason it shouldnt be allowed.
Letsbeef.com lets not forget the name. IF both people agree theres no reason at all we shouldnt honour that.
Quote:
Guess its to hide the fact someone done this before with out concent?
|
Why you keep playing subliminals? Name names lol.
No one forces another to agree to a ban battle, but let them have the freedom to do so damn.
You've gotten mad anal fueler lol.
|
04-29-2012, 02:06 PM
|
#2
|
Ranked Text Record 99 Won / 0 Lost
Join Date: Mar 2010
Voted:
67
audio / 906
text
Posts: 24,926
Mentioned: 1635 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
|
If two people both agree to the ban stipulation theres absolutely no reason it shouldnt be allowed.
Letsbeef.com lets not forget the name. IF both people agree theres no reason at all we shouldnt honour that.
Quote:
Guess its to hide the fact someone done this before with out concent?
|
Why you keep playing subliminals? Name names lol.
No one forces another to agree to a ban battle, but let them have the freedom to do so damn.
You've gotten mad anal fueler lol.
|
Offline
|
|

04-29-2012, 03:47 PM
|
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 12,790,240
Mentioned: 2452 Post(s)
Tagged: 114 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 31 Won / 3 Lost
Ranked Text Record 439 Won / 75 Lost
|
Ban Battles will NEVER be a fair result as ppl will just vote to get one person removed from the site.
The whole fucking concept of them is fucking Bullshit as well... all it is, is another way for ppl to look big in the forums. "Oh you won't accept? hahah i told him didn't i?" just fucking battle, i mean whats happened to the actual "pride" of beating someone in a battle?
__________________
_____________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohs
i replied to 14 year old battles to bring back cats who aint around no more
|
|
04-29-2012, 03:47 PM
|
#3
|
Ranked Audio Record 31 Won / 3 Lost
Ranked Text Record 439 Won / 75 Lost
Join Date: Dec 1969
Voted:
531
audio / 3221
text
Posts: 12,790,240
Mentioned: 2452 Post(s)
Tagged: 114 Thread(s)
|
Ban Battles will NEVER be a fair result as ppl will just vote to get one person removed from the site.
The whole fucking concept of them is fucking Bullshit as well... all it is, is another way for ppl to look big in the forums. "Oh you won't accept? hahah i told him didn't i?" just fucking battle, i mean whats happened to the actual "pride" of beating someone in a battle?
|
Offline
|
|

04-29-2012, 04:08 PM
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 12,004
Mentioned: 582 Post(s)
Tagged: 46 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 70 Won / 25 Lost
Ranked Text Record 344 Won / 124 Lost
|
smh...question...if we dont agree with it, how could a user get another user permabanned? lol...they can do it all they want as long as staff doesnt oblige
__________________
"If stupid Fish-Man tries to trick Grundy, Grundy will crush"
-Solomon Grundy
|
04-29-2012, 04:08 PM
|
#4
|
Ranked Audio Record 70 Won / 25 Lost
Ranked Text Record 344 Won / 124 Lost
Join Date: Mar 2009
Voted:
183
audio / 1147
text
Posts: 12,004
Mentioned: 582 Post(s)
Tagged: 46 Thread(s)
|
smh...question...if we dont agree with it, how could a user get another user permabanned? lol...they can do it all they want as long as staff doesnt oblige
__________________
"If stupid Fish-Man tries to trick Grundy, Grundy will crush"
-Solomon Grundy
|
Offline
|
|

04-29-2012, 04:31 PM
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,698
Mentioned: 616 Post(s)
Tagged: 41 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 62 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 75 Won / 24 Lost
|
I agree with Fuel tbh. Purely because .... I mean look at it this way. If Mac battles Vitriol in a ban battle. There is noway the majority of voters who know what's at stake are going to vote in Maccs favour even if he did by some miracle drop a winning verse. Yes, we'd like to think voters are 100% honest 100% of the time but in reality that isn't the case and to think otherwise would be naive. I'm not saying everyone is like that but certainly enough to effect the out come.
---------- Post added at 04:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:28 PM ----------
But tbh I don't even know why it has gotten to this point. I said yesterday that Macc wouldn't agree to ban battle and that's exactly what happened.
---------- Post added at 04:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:30 PM ----------
P.S
This thread seems like a pissing contest
|
04-29-2012, 04:31 PM
|
#5
|
Ranked Audio Record 62 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 75 Won / 24 Lost
Join Date: Jan 2009
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: 12,698
Mentioned: 616 Post(s)
Tagged: 41 Thread(s)
|
I agree with Fuel tbh. Purely because .... I mean look at it this way. If Mac battles Vitriol in a ban battle. There is noway the majority of voters who know what's at stake are going to vote in Maccs favour even if he did by some miracle drop a winning verse. Yes, we'd like to think voters are 100% honest 100% of the time but in reality that isn't the case and to think otherwise would be naive. I'm not saying everyone is like that but certainly enough to effect the out come.
---------- Post added at 04:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:28 PM ----------
But tbh I don't even know why it has gotten to this point. I said yesterday that Macc wouldn't agree to ban battle and that's exactly what happened.
---------- Post added at 04:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:30 PM ----------
P.S
This thread seems like a pissing contest
|
Offline
|
|

04-29-2012, 05:15 PM
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,926
Mentioned: 1635 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 99 Won / 0 Lost
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just €
I agree with Fuel tbh. Purely because .... I mean look at it this way. If Mac battles Vitriol in a ban battle. There is noway the majority of voters who know what's at stake are going to vote in Maccs favour even if he did by some miracle drop a winning verse. Yes, we'd like to think voters are 100% honest 100% of the time but in reality that isn't the case and to think otherwise would be naive. I'm not saying everyone is like that but certainly enough to effect the out come.
|
If two people agree they do so at there own risks. They know what there letting themselves in for.
|
04-29-2012, 05:15 PM
|
#6
|
Ranked Text Record 99 Won / 0 Lost
Join Date: Mar 2010
Voted:
67
audio / 906
text
Posts: 24,926
Mentioned: 1635 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just €
I agree with Fuel tbh. Purely because .... I mean look at it this way. If Mac battles Vitriol in a ban battle. There is noway the majority of voters who know what's at stake are going to vote in Maccs favour even if he did by some miracle drop a winning verse. Yes, we'd like to think voters are 100% honest 100% of the time but in reality that isn't the case and to think otherwise would be naive. I'm not saying everyone is like that but certainly enough to effect the out come.
|
If two people agree they do so at there own risks. They know what there letting themselves in for.
|
Offline
|
|

04-29-2012, 05:30 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 123,459,231
Mentioned: 2136 Post(s)
Tagged: 122 Thread(s)
|
Bans.. especially perma bans.. are a last resort tool to use... and should be ONLY used if the persons breaks rule on LB.. We will NOT honour those who want their accounts perma banned for any other reason... Facts are.. Bans are not asked for.. They are a punishment.. If they want their account Deleted.. its a different story.. Anyone can ask at any time for their account to be deleted... But they will lose everything and it will never be reinstated... And they will have to submit the request to Support@letsbeef.com and wait in line for it to be done like everyone else... We will not fill these kinds of request on a whim..
__________________
<script async src="https://widget.spreaker.com/widgets.js"></script>
Last edited by Pugz; 04-29-2012 at 05:33 PM.
|
04-29-2012, 05:30 PM
|
#7
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Voted:
536
audio / 63
text
Posts: 123,459,231
Mentioned: 2136 Post(s)
Tagged: 122 Thread(s)
|
Bans.. especially perma bans.. are a last resort tool to use... and should be ONLY used if the persons breaks rule on LB.. We will NOT honour those who want their accounts perma banned for any other reason... Facts are.. Bans are not asked for.. They are a punishment.. If they want their account Deleted.. its a different story.. Anyone can ask at any time for their account to be deleted... But they will lose everything and it will never be reinstated... And they will have to submit the request to Support@letsbeef.com and wait in line for it to be done like everyone else... We will not fill these kinds of request on a whim..
__________________
<script async src="https://widget.spreaker.com/widgets.js"></script>
Last edited by Pugz; 04-29-2012 at 05:33 PM.
|
Offline
|
|

04-30-2012, 06:49 AM
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,926
Mentioned: 1635 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 99 Won / 0 Lost
|
We can permaban people in seconds, if two people are both willing to put there accounts on the line why shouldnt they be allowed to?
Battling with stakes adds excitement and its not like we get many of these. In fact i can only think of one permaban battle going down since 2009.
& that was a hyped ass battle too.
|
04-30-2012, 06:49 AM
|
#8
|
Ranked Text Record 99 Won / 0 Lost
Join Date: Mar 2010
Voted:
67
audio / 906
text
Posts: 24,926
Mentioned: 1635 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
|
We can permaban people in seconds, if two people are both willing to put there accounts on the line why shouldnt they be allowed to?
Battling with stakes adds excitement and its not like we get many of these. In fact i can only think of one permaban battle going down since 2009.
& that was a hyped ass battle too.
|
Offline
|
|

04-30-2012, 03:00 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 123,459,231
Mentioned: 2136 Post(s)
Tagged: 122 Thread(s)
|
Cuz like i said.. Bans are NOT requested.. they are handed out against the persons will as a punishment... I will never fill a request like that... Like i said if they want.. I can delete their account... But they have to request it to support@letsbeef.com.... And they will loose everything.... (loosing everything is higher stakes than a ban anyway)... I dont want to turn this into a regular thing.. So im strongly advising against it... And id appreciate that if it does go down that it not be posted in LB news as I am not supporting it...
__________________
<script async src="https://widget.spreaker.com/widgets.js"></script>
|
04-30-2012, 03:00 PM
|
#9
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Voted:
536
audio / 63
text
Posts: 123,459,231
Mentioned: 2136 Post(s)
Tagged: 122 Thread(s)
|
Cuz like i said.. Bans are NOT requested.. they are handed out against the persons will as a punishment... I will never fill a request like that... Like i said if they want.. I can delete their account... But they have to request it to support@letsbeef.com.... And they will loose everything.... (loosing everything is higher stakes than a ban anyway)... I dont want to turn this into a regular thing.. So im strongly advising against it... And id appreciate that if it does go down that it not be posted in LB news as I am not supporting it...
|
Offline
|
|

04-30-2012, 03:06 PM
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,926
Mentioned: 1635 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 99 Won / 0 Lost
|
So a account deletion battle would be allowed under extreme circumstances? Cuz i got my eyes on Lizman tbh LOL.
|
04-30-2012, 03:06 PM
|
#10
|
Ranked Text Record 99 Won / 0 Lost
Join Date: Mar 2010
Voted:
67
audio / 906
text
Posts: 24,926
Mentioned: 1635 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
|
So a account deletion battle would be allowed under extreme circumstances? Cuz i got my eyes on Lizman tbh LOL.
|
Offline
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 PM.
|
|
|