|

10-09-2011, 05:57 PM
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,067
Mentioned: 983 Post(s)
Tagged: 15 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 2 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 237 Won / 67 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 10 Won / 3 Lost
|
Text battles improvements do you think ?
Now I've got your attention let me list these idea's
These come from being an admin my self on six shot.com
So
#1 - being able to challenge anyone to beef anywhere on the site just by clicking on there name it should give you a link to send beef...
#2 - not only should we have wins and losses but we should have KO's if we win a battle with say 85% or more of the votes we should be awarded a KO this will not only give good bragging rights but will push textee's to type that verse as hard as possible
#3 - expo section with concepts name plays and wordplays always on the rise I feel expo's are being lost and peeps battles are not being voted on fairly because they type there expo in the voting columns not everyone reads it until afterbthey have voted I suggest a separate box whilst typing the battle to drop an expo in then once it goes to the booth it should have a link that says expo's given this enables the voter to see they have explained something thus making them peep it before voting thus creating a fairer vote...
#4 - the option to hide ya verse when sending private beef I don't know about y'all but dudes that just flip lines in text are lacking creativity if we could send beef to someone with the option to keep our verse hidden until they have replied I believe we would get better battles out of this. i know that when i send a battle I wont that dude to reply a.sap and not have three days reading my shit thinking how am I Gunnar top that if I had the option to conceal my verse dude would have no choice but to type what he thinks would beat me.....
#5 - weight divisions rated on your win percentage could be like user titles on there name once they have obtained these so if your win be 90% or above you be like heavy weight if you 80-90% you super middle weight 70-80% you middle weight 60-70% lightweight 50-60% welterweight 40-50% fetherweight but you can only achieve these titles once you have completed say 50 battles or all noobs with like 10-0 records will be thinking they heavyweights...
#6 - more voting categories I feel we need an option to get rated on personals and name play
This is all I can think of at the minute
.:X:.
__________________
X-Calibur The leader of ...
GET DOWN OR LAY DOWN!!!
... No One Cared Who I Was Until I Put The Mask On ...
Fair Votes Click HERE
|
10-09-2011, 05:57 PM
|
#1
|
Ranked Audio Record 2 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 237 Won / 67 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 10 Won / 3 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2006
Voted:
82
audio / 1538
text
Posts: 4,067
Mentioned: 983 Post(s)
Tagged: 15 Thread(s)
|
Text battles improvements do you think ?
Now I've got your attention let me list these idea's
These come from being an admin my self on six shot.com
So
#1 - being able to challenge anyone to beef anywhere on the site just by clicking on there name it should give you a link to send beef...
#2 - not only should we have wins and losses but we should have KO's if we win a battle with say 85% or more of the votes we should be awarded a KO this will not only give good bragging rights but will push textee's to type that verse as hard as possible
#3 - expo section with concepts name plays and wordplays always on the rise I feel expo's are being lost and peeps battles are not being voted on fairly because they type there expo in the voting columns not everyone reads it until afterbthey have voted I suggest a separate box whilst typing the battle to drop an expo in then once it goes to the booth it should have a link that says expo's given this enables the voter to see they have explained something thus making them peep it before voting thus creating a fairer vote...
#4 - the option to hide ya verse when sending private beef I don't know about y'all but dudes that just flip lines in text are lacking creativity if we could send beef to someone with the option to keep our verse hidden until they have replied I believe we would get better battles out of this. i know that when i send a battle I wont that dude to reply a.sap and not have three days reading my shit thinking how am I Gunnar top that if I had the option to conceal my verse dude would have no choice but to type what he thinks would beat me.....
#5 - weight divisions rated on your win percentage could be like user titles on there name once they have obtained these so if your win be 90% or above you be like heavy weight if you 80-90% you super middle weight 70-80% you middle weight 60-70% lightweight 50-60% welterweight 40-50% fetherweight but you can only achieve these titles once you have completed say 50 battles or all noobs with like 10-0 records will be thinking they heavyweights...
#6 - more voting categories I feel we need an option to get rated on personals and name play
This is all I can think of at the minute
.:X:.
__________________
X-Calibur The leader of ...
GET DOWN OR LAY DOWN!!!
... No One Cared Who I Was Until I Put The Mask On ...
Fair Votes Click HERE
|
Offline
|
|

10-09-2011, 06:26 PM
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,559
Mentioned: 1487 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 2 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 199 Won / 47 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
|
1, 2 & 4 .....I Co Sign FULLYYY .... i Co Sign this Whole thing But Those 3 NUMBERS The Most!!!
__________________
TheElite
|
10-09-2011, 06:26 PM
|
#2
|
Ranked Audio Record 2 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 199 Won / 47 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
Join Date: Sep 2010
Voted:
52
audio / 528
text
Posts: 4,559
Mentioned: 1487 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
|
1, 2 & 4 .....I Co Sign FULLYYY .... i Co Sign this Whole thing But Those 3 NUMBERS The Most!!!
__________________
TheElite
|
Offline
|
|

10-09-2011, 06:35 PM
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,426
Mentioned: 963 Post(s)
Tagged: 33 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 145 Won / 55 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 6 Won / 3 Lost
|
#5 won't work, because being a heavyweight has nothing to do with wins/losses. For example, say someone had a 10-10 record. That would be considered a welterweight according to your scale. What if they had done 20 battles against top tier members with wins against: RULE, ReeFer, & DaDDiO, & losses to UA, Jason, & Illimit? I'd classify a battler like this as a heavyweight. Your way would encourage sniping so that members could have that good record & "heavyweight" title.
—Knowledge dropped.
|
10-09-2011, 06:35 PM
|
#3
|
Ranked Text Record 145 Won / 55 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 6 Won / 3 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2010
Voted:
0 audio / 529
text
Posts: 5,426
Mentioned: 963 Post(s)
Tagged: 33 Thread(s)
|
#5 won't work, because being a heavyweight has nothing to do with wins/losses. For example, say someone had a 10-10 record. That would be considered a welterweight according to your scale. What if they had done 20 battles against top tier members with wins against: RULE, ReeFer, & DaDDiO, & losses to UA, Jason, & Illimit? I'd classify a battler like this as a heavyweight. Your way would encourage sniping so that members could have that good record & "heavyweight" title.
—Knowledge dropped.
|
Offline
|
|

10-09-2011, 06:35 PM
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 780
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 17 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 80 Won / 22 Lost
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#2 - not only should we have wins and losses but we should have KO's if we win a battle with say 85% or more of the votes we should be awarded a KO this will not only give good bragging rights but will push textee's to type that verse as hard as possible
.:X:.
|
completely agree with that...
__________________
I am a Goon
|
10-09-2011, 06:35 PM
|
#4
|
Violentby Design
Ranked Text Record 80 Won / 22 Lost
Join Date: Jul 2011
Voted:
41
audio / 569
text
Posts: 780
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 17 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#2 - not only should we have wins and losses but we should have KO's if we win a battle with say 85% or more of the votes we should be awarded a KO this will not only give good bragging rights but will push textee's to type that verse as hard as possible
.:X:.
|
completely agree with that...
__________________
I am a Goon
|
Offline
|
|

10-09-2011, 09:07 PM
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
#2 definitely would not work for the simple fact of those we refer to as snipers. Plus the Admins aren't going to sit and determine which battle would be considered for a KO or not.
|
10-09-2011, 09:07 PM
|
#5
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
#2 definitely would not work for the simple fact of those we refer to as snipers. Plus the Admins aren't going to sit and determine which battle would be considered for a KO or not.
|
Offline
|
|

10-09-2011, 09:33 PM
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,697
Mentioned: 616 Post(s)
Tagged: 41 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 62 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 75 Won / 24 Lost
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illimination
#2 definitely would not work for the simple fact of those we refer to as snipers. Plus the Admins aren't going to sit and determine which battle would be considered for a KO or not.
|
The KO would be determined Automatically I think. As soon as that percentage hits 85% or higher it will register as a KO. just like the system does for a win
|
10-09-2011, 09:33 PM
|
#6
|
Ranked Audio Record 62 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 75 Won / 24 Lost
Join Date: Jan 2009
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: 12,697
Mentioned: 616 Post(s)
Tagged: 41 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illimination
#2 definitely would not work for the simple fact of those we refer to as snipers. Plus the Admins aren't going to sit and determine which battle would be considered for a KO or not.
|
The KO would be determined Automatically I think. As soon as that percentage hits 85% or higher it will register as a KO. just like the system does for a win
|
Offline
|
|

10-09-2011, 09:51 PM
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,578
Mentioned: 713 Post(s)
Tagged: 56 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 3 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 34 Won / 6 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#1 - being able to challenge anyone to beef anywhere on the site just by clicking on there name it should give you a link to send beef...
|
This has been one of the things on the top of my wishlist for a minute. It could potentially help increase activity in the battling arena a lot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#2 - not only should we have wins and losses but we should have KO's if we win a battle with say 85% or more of the votes we should be awarded a KO this will not only give good bragging rights but will push textee's to type that verse as hard as possible
|
This is a cool idea but how do you put that on the record? Just say A-B with C KOs like in boxing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#3 - expo section with concepts name plays and wordplays always on the rise I feel expo's are being lost and peeps battles are not being voted on fairly because they type there expo in the voting columns not everyone reads it until afterbthey have voted I suggest a separate box whilst typing the battle to drop an expo in then once it goes to the booth it should have a link that says expo's given this enables the voter to see they have explained something thus making them peep it before voting thus creating a fairer vote...
|
I don't know how necessary this really is but it is a neat/good idea. There's plenty of potential for people to just not click the expo link. Maybe an onMouseOver with a little text box that comes up? That might be a little more efficient and more likely to succeed. That would probably take a good bit of coding to go about doing but when I link this thread to Pugz, assuming he hasn't seen it already, he might have a slightly better idea than I would. I don't think it would be easy though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#4 - the option to hide ya verse when sending private beef I don't know about y'all but dudes that just flip lines in text are lacking creativity if we could send beef to someone with the option to keep our verse hidden until they have replied I believe we would get better battles out of this. i know that when i send a battle I wont that dude to reply a.sap and not have three days reading my shit thinking how am I Gunnar top that if I had the option to conceal my verse dude would have no choice but to type what he thinks would beat me.....
|
Blind drops have been talked about for a while now and I think we should do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#5 - weight divisions rated on your win percentage could be like user titles on there name once they have obtained these so if your win be 90% or above you be like heavy weight if you 80-90% you super middle weight 70-80% you middle weight 60-70% lightweight 50-60% welterweight 40-50% fetherweight but you can only achieve these titles once you have completed say 50 battles or all noobs with like 10-0 records will be thinking they heavyweights...
|
Leagues like this have been discussed for a while but it's not something we can just throw onto the system. I would imagine there's something in the works but what you're talking about is a very labor intensive peice of programming so I wouldn't be looking for it in the very near future. If I recall correctly there was something like this being worked on for Fly Hip Hop where users were ranked according to their win percentage vs the number of battles total and something else. I wouldn't mind (<- See what I did there?) seeing a system similar to that where the rankings of opponents was also taken into consideration. That way if you battled somebody with a higher ranking in your bracket it would count for more than if you battled someone who had just entered it. This is all hypothetical and would require a LOT of work and coding though. Hopefully it is something that comes into fruition at some point in the future though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#6 - more voting categories I feel we need an option to get rated on personals and name play
|
I don't think we really nead these. Personals are just a sub-catagory of punchlines and name play is just a sub category of word play to be frank.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krhyme Killz
lol...hava nagila nigga
|
|
10-09-2011, 09:51 PM
|
#7
|
Ranked Audio Record 3 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 34 Won / 6 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
Join Date: May 2006
Voted:
95
audio / 718
text
Posts: 6,578
Mentioned: 713 Post(s)
Tagged: 56 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#1 - being able to challenge anyone to beef anywhere on the site just by clicking on there name it should give you a link to send beef...
|
This has been one of the things on the top of my wishlist for a minute. It could potentially help increase activity in the battling arena a lot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#2 - not only should we have wins and losses but we should have KO's if we win a battle with say 85% or more of the votes we should be awarded a KO this will not only give good bragging rights but will push textee's to type that verse as hard as possible
|
This is a cool idea but how do you put that on the record? Just say A-B with C KOs like in boxing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#3 - expo section with concepts name plays and wordplays always on the rise I feel expo's are being lost and peeps battles are not being voted on fairly because they type there expo in the voting columns not everyone reads it until afterbthey have voted I suggest a separate box whilst typing the battle to drop an expo in then once it goes to the booth it should have a link that says expo's given this enables the voter to see they have explained something thus making them peep it before voting thus creating a fairer vote...
|
I don't know how necessary this really is but it is a neat/good idea. There's plenty of potential for people to just not click the expo link. Maybe an onMouseOver with a little text box that comes up? That might be a little more efficient and more likely to succeed. That would probably take a good bit of coding to go about doing but when I link this thread to Pugz, assuming he hasn't seen it already, he might have a slightly better idea than I would. I don't think it would be easy though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#4 - the option to hide ya verse when sending private beef I don't know about y'all but dudes that just flip lines in text are lacking creativity if we could send beef to someone with the option to keep our verse hidden until they have replied I believe we would get better battles out of this. i know that when i send a battle I wont that dude to reply a.sap and not have three days reading my shit thinking how am I Gunnar top that if I had the option to conceal my verse dude would have no choice but to type what he thinks would beat me.....
|
Blind drops have been talked about for a while now and I think we should do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#5 - weight divisions rated on your win percentage could be like user titles on there name once they have obtained these so if your win be 90% or above you be like heavy weight if you 80-90% you super middle weight 70-80% you middle weight 60-70% lightweight 50-60% welterweight 40-50% fetherweight but you can only achieve these titles once you have completed say 50 battles or all noobs with like 10-0 records will be thinking they heavyweights...
|
Leagues like this have been discussed for a while but it's not something we can just throw onto the system. I would imagine there's something in the works but what you're talking about is a very labor intensive peice of programming so I wouldn't be looking for it in the very near future. If I recall correctly there was something like this being worked on for Fly Hip Hop where users were ranked according to their win percentage vs the number of battles total and something else. I wouldn't mind (<- See what I did there?) seeing a system similar to that where the rankings of opponents was also taken into consideration. That way if you battled somebody with a higher ranking in your bracket it would count for more than if you battled someone who had just entered it. This is all hypothetical and would require a LOT of work and coding though. Hopefully it is something that comes into fruition at some point in the future though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Calibur
#6 - more voting categories I feel we need an option to get rated on personals and name play
|
I don't think we really nead these. Personals are just a sub-catagory of punchlines and name play is just a sub category of word play to be frank.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krhyme Killz
lol...hava nagila nigga
|
|
Offline
|
|

10-09-2011, 10:20 PM
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jus Tuco
The KO would be determined Automatically I think. As soon as that percentage hits 85% or higher it will register as a KO. just like the system does for a win
|
Alright. Now how would it be fixed in? With everyone sniping, all you would see is a bunch of KOs here and there which can be misleading by far. If this option would work, it should be worked in with a lot of aspects on top of private battles. It should actually play the roll of an option or granted permission. Too much time would be spent on the blueprint alone to make that work.
|
10-09-2011, 10:20 PM
|
#8
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jus Tuco
The KO would be determined Automatically I think. As soon as that percentage hits 85% or higher it will register as a KO. just like the system does for a win
|
Alright. Now how would it be fixed in? With everyone sniping, all you would see is a bunch of KOs here and there which can be misleading by far. If this option would work, it should be worked in with a lot of aspects on top of private battles. It should actually play the roll of an option or granted permission. Too much time would be spent on the blueprint alone to make that work.
|
Offline
|
|

10-09-2011, 10:26 PM
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,578
Mentioned: 713 Post(s)
Tagged: 56 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 3 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 34 Won / 6 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illimination
Alright. Now how would it be fixed in? With everyone sniping, all you would see is a bunch of KOs here and there which can be misleading by far. If this option would work, it should be worked in with a lot of aspects on top of private battles. It should actually play the roll of an option or granted permission. Too much time would be spent on the blueprint alone to make that work.
|
If it was done in conjunction with a league system where people would only be able to battle in their bracket then sniping would pretty much die off and the system would work. Hypothetically of course.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krhyme Killz
lol...hava nagila nigga
|
|
10-09-2011, 10:26 PM
|
#9
|
Ranked Audio Record 3 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 34 Won / 6 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
Join Date: May 2006
Voted:
95
audio / 718
text
Posts: 6,578
Mentioned: 713 Post(s)
Tagged: 56 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illimination
Alright. Now how would it be fixed in? With everyone sniping, all you would see is a bunch of KOs here and there which can be misleading by far. If this option would work, it should be worked in with a lot of aspects on top of private battles. It should actually play the roll of an option or granted permission. Too much time would be spent on the blueprint alone to make that work.
|
If it was done in conjunction with a league system where people would only be able to battle in their bracket then sniping would pretty much die off and the system would work. Hypothetically of course.
|
Offline
|
|

10-09-2011, 10:43 PM
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindless
If it was done in conjunction with a league system where people would only be able to battle in their bracket then sniping would pretty much die off and the system would work. Hypothetically of course.
|
That might be possibly the only way. However, the fact still remains, the blueprint itself will take a good length of time. As far as a league system, that would be an idea I would push. Yes, could take some time but will definitely put out a lot of quality battles and votes (from only those in that league and higher).
|
10-09-2011, 10:43 PM
|
#10
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindless
If it was done in conjunction with a league system where people would only be able to battle in their bracket then sniping would pretty much die off and the system would work. Hypothetically of course.
|
That might be possibly the only way. However, the fact still remains, the blueprint itself will take a good length of time. As far as a league system, that would be an idea I would push. Yes, could take some time but will definitely put out a lot of quality battles and votes (from only those in that league and higher).
|
Offline
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.
|
|
|