King Titles

Lmfao @ all of this.

When it comes to the LBA, Everyone's got a false title at this point haha

Lmfao @ all of this.

When it comes to the LBA, Everyone's got a false title at this point haha

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Punk

Lmfao @ all of this.

When it comes to the LBA, Everyone's got a false title at this point haha

@BizzyOne you see what he just said bruhhhh

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Punk

Lmfao @ all of this.

When it comes to the LBA, Everyone's got a false title at this point haha

@BizzyOne you see what he just said bruhhhh

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

And they do count. They would also have counted if someone no showed him, like they have for every other LB_ champion ever.

But that's a separate issue. If you dont like no show wins, cool, make a thread. As it stands they count and Seuls title isnt in question what so ever.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

And they do count. They would also have counted if someone no showed him, like they have for every other LB_ champion ever.

But that's a separate issue. If you dont like no show wins, cool, make a thread. As it stands they count and Seuls title isnt in question what so ever.

Originally Posted by RULE

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

This a good idea

Originally Posted by RULE

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

This a good idea

Originally Posted by RULE

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

Still should be 7 consecutive ACTUAL wins minimum and then I agree.

Originally Posted by RULE

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

Still should be 7 consecutive ACTUAL wins minimum and then I agree.

the lba and lbt king should be voted for. an annual event where we decide who's had the most impressive run in the lba/lbt as of the current year.

how this would work? we'll start with a vote since it's january. let's say rule gets lba king and esso gets lbt king. then next year in jan we'll vote again. let's say kiwi wins over shodan this jan and defends his title all year against some big names. well then next year it wouldn't be a shocker for him to be voted lbt king.

the lba and lbt king should be voted for. an annual event where we decide who's had the most impressive run in the lba/lbt as of the current year.

how this would work? we'll start with a vote since it's january. let's say rule gets lba king and esso gets lbt king. then next year in jan we'll vote again. let's say kiwi wins over shodan this jan and defends his title all year against some big names. well then next year it wouldn't be a shocker for him to be voted lbt king.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Noir

Still should be 7 consecutive ACTUAL wins minimum and then I agree.

I dont see why the number 7 so important lol

Surely the if someone has 3x 6 win streaks they are more a "King" than one person with a 7 streak.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Noir

Still should be 7 consecutive ACTUAL wins minimum and then I agree.

I dont see why the number 7 so important lol

Surely the if someone has 3x 6 win streaks they are more a "King" than one person with a 7 streak.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

I'd be waiving the consecutive win requirement due to every other guy running this shit being a dumbass and I believe its unfair to strip titles based on people being dumbasses.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

I'd be waiving the consecutive win requirement due to every other guy running this shit being a dumbass and I believe its unfair to strip titles based on people being dumbasses.

Originally Posted by RULE

I dont see why the number 7 so important lol

Surely the if someone has 3x 6 win streaks they are more a "King" than one person with a 7 streak.

the number 7 is random and meaningless. we need new criteria. i propose an annual vote.

Originally Posted by RULE

I dont see why the number 7 so important lol

Surely the if someone has 3x 6 win streaks they are more a "King" than one person with a 7 streak.

the number 7 is random and meaningless. we need new criteria. i propose an annual vote.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by Noir

Still should be 7 consecutive ACTUAL wins minimum and then I agree.

Put this into place as the rule, if in case of a No Show occurring, have a 'stand in' ready in line to step in and take the match up. Would mean a few new lines would have to be wrote or some re-wrote but a title defence would still take place.

7 wins in a row, you're the King. (though OCD kicking in, 8 looks & sounds better imo)

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by Noir

Still should be 7 consecutive ACTUAL wins minimum and then I agree.

Put this into place as the rule, if in case of a No Show occurring, have a 'stand in' ready in line to step in and take the match up. Would mean a few new lines would have to be wrote or some re-wrote but a title defence would still take place.

7 wins in a row, you're the King. (though OCD kicking in, 8 looks & sounds better imo)