King Titles

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

See this is part of the problem man. We STILL have no clear criteria for the shit. Rai’s gotta earn it with another defence but because you’ve beat Phil
Banks (which is a great win, that’s not my point) you just get it off that alone? Shits too inconsistent to be taken seriously

You've seen the thread. I asked for peoples feedback, for clarity.

They didnt want anyone stripped so we changed it to 7 successful LBA title matches, including no shows. As thats the only criteria that allows me and Seul to keep the title.

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

See this is part of the problem man. We STILL have no clear criteria for the shit. Rai’s gotta earn it with another defence but because you’ve beat Phil
Banks (which is a great win, that’s not my point) you just get it off that alone? Shits too inconsistent to be taken seriously

You've seen the thread. I asked for peoples feedback, for clarity.

They didnt want anyone stripped so we changed it to 7 successful LBA title matches, including no shows. As thats the only criteria that allows me and Seul to keep the title.

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by Rieper

That's not my point at all with this. I just find it incredibly weird how the challenge was made in the first place where he won't battle on his "retired" account. Is that serious? Is Esso gonna make a multi account and challenge the next guy who gets LBT King all of a sudden because he retired Esso? Shit's corny, imo.

Agree with Lock here.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by Rieper

That's not my point at all with this. I just find it incredibly weird how the challenge was made in the first place where he won't battle on his "retired" account. Is that serious? Is Esso gonna make a multi account and challenge the next guy who gets LBT King all of a sudden because he retired Esso? Shit's corny, imo.

Agree with Lock here.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Rieper

That's not my point at all with this. I just find it incredibly weird how the challenge was made in the first place where he won't battle on his "retired" account. Is that serious? Is Esso gonna make a multi account and challenge the next guy who gets LBT King all of a sudden because he retired Esso? Shit's corny, imo.

Oh i agree its weird as fuck. Does the Illo account have 3 blue flames? Seems to be the only reason i could imagine him not wanting to use it.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Rieper

That's not my point at all with this. I just find it incredibly weird how the challenge was made in the first place where he won't battle on his "retired" account. Is that serious? Is Esso gonna make a multi account and challenge the next guy who gets LBT King all of a sudden because he retired Esso? Shit's corny, imo.

Oh i agree its weird as fuck. Does the Illo account have 3 blue flames? Seems to be the only reason i could imagine him not wanting to use it.

Yeah, this shits a joke.

Yeah, this shits a joke.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

A king title SHOULD be a 2+ year achievement.

Should of never been changed from the original stipulation in the first place.

Theres an event once a month. You want it to be 10 defences....that equals 2 years?

I think its bullshit to try and bring in Seul. You dont like those rules, cool, thats still the rules and always has been. Pretty sure some people no showed ILLoKWENT too. ITs alright if for some reason you want to punish the guys who show, not sure why you would, but okay, you have an opinion on the currently in place rules and perhaps that could be looked at separately.

But if you want a solution for RULE, just do what we're doing for Rai. Have RULE battle Biz, if he wins, count it as his 6th def with one more to go. If he loses, it counts as 5 defences.

Perfect solution for me but who knows if people would go for it.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

A king title SHOULD be a 2+ year achievement.

Should of never been changed from the original stipulation in the first place.

Theres an event once a month. You want it to be 10 defences....that equals 2 years?

I think its bullshit to try and bring in Seul. You dont like those rules, cool, thats still the rules and always has been. Pretty sure some people no showed ILLoKWENT too. ITs alright if for some reason you want to punish the guys who show, not sure why you would, but okay, you have an opinion on the currently in place rules and perhaps that could be looked at separately.

But if you want a solution for RULE, just do what we're doing for Rai. Have RULE battle Biz, if he wins, count it as his 6th def with one more to go. If he loses, it counts as 5 defences.

Perfect solution for me but who knows if people would go for it.

Originally Posted by RULE

Oh i agree its weird as fuck. Does the Illo account have 3 blue flames? Seems to be the only reason i could imagine him not wanting to use it.

Yes it does. Like c'mon it looks like a complete joke, imo.

Originally Posted by RULE

Oh i agree its weird as fuck. Does the Illo account have 3 blue flames? Seems to be the only reason i could imagine him not wanting to use it.

Yes it does. Like c'mon it looks like a complete joke, imo.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

I disagree with this. Me and Kiwi are probably going forward with this but youre talking about putting the legacy of something pretty dope in the hands of a non democratic decision

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

I disagree with this. Me and Kiwi are probably going forward with this but youre talking about putting the legacy of something pretty dope in the hands of a non democratic decision

Illo is the only person to have 7 defenses excluding no shows I'm pretty sure and should be the only one with the title.

Everyone else's title is a participation trophy at this point.

Illo is the only person to have 7 defenses excluding no shows I'm pretty sure and should be the only one with the title.

Everyone else's title is a participation trophy at this point.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by EtH

But if you want a solution for RULE, just do what we're doing for Rai. Have RULE battle Biz, if he wins, count it as his 6th def with one more to go. If he loses, it counts as 5 defences.

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by EtH

But if you want a solution for RULE, just do what we're doing for Rai. Have RULE battle Biz, if he wins, count it as his 6th def with one more to go. If he loses, it counts as 5 defences.

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

[RULE]

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

[RULE]

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.