Heaven....nah yo

[Spooky Deep]

Originally Posted by BLNK

The term creator implies an inherent anthropomorphism. "Space" is the result of a physical reaction. Not an anthropomorphic man in the sky.

How does a creator imply anthropomorphism? You assume a creator has human characteristics.

By that logic...someone else just as well could say humans have creator characteristics.

Originally Posted by Krhyme Killz

no creator of anything...

i believe shit is as it is and has become as it has become.

What about how shit was before shit is?

[Spooky Deep]

Originally Posted by BLNK

The term creator implies an inherent anthropomorphism. "Space" is the result of a physical reaction. Not an anthropomorphic man in the sky.

How does a creator imply anthropomorphism? You assume a creator has human characteristics.

By that logic...someone else just as well could say humans have creator characteristics.

Originally Posted by Krhyme Killz

no creator of anything...

i believe shit is as it is and has become as it has become.

What about how shit was before shit is?

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

How does a creator imply anthropomorphism? You assume a creator has human characteristics.

By that logic...someone else just as well could say humans have creator characteristics.


What about how shit was before shit is?

What is a creator, then, @SpookyDeep

And, that's exactly what the bible states. Lol. And by the last portion, which I assume was the edit, do you mean the incredibly dense singularity from which our universe expanded, or the outlying dimensional planes beyond the foundational structure of said universe?

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

How does a creator imply anthropomorphism? You assume a creator has human characteristics.

By that logic...someone else just as well could say humans have creator characteristics.


What about how shit was before shit is?

What is a creator, then, @SpookyDeep

And, that's exactly what the bible states. Lol. And by the last portion, which I assume was the edit, do you mean the incredibly dense singularity from which our universe expanded, or the outlying dimensional planes beyond the foundational structure of said universe?

[Godbody]

lol this entire post is stupid as fuck

There really isnt any deep thought behind it all, its just shallow, trivial, bullshit that you & I dont know the answer to

/thread

[Godbody]

lol this entire post is stupid as fuck

There really isnt any deep thought behind it all, its just shallow, trivial, bullshit that you & I dont know the answer to

/thread

[Krhyme Killz]

word...everyone go peep pULSe's thread about a video game....

---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

H



What about how shit was before shit is?

back then shit was how it was before this...things are just in a state of being..

[Krhyme Killz]

word...everyone go peep pULSe's thread about a video game....

---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

H



What about how shit was before shit is?

back then shit was how it was before this...things are just in a state of being..

[Obey]

Originally Posted by Krhyme Killz

smh....do you think?

think about the cause and effect. rather than saying 'Earth is perfect for humans'...think more along the lines of 'humans evolved here under the conditions that Earth has had...for MANY years'

when Earth was formed there were no humans...and the conditions would NOT have suited human life

Then why doesn't Mars develop conditions for human life to prosper there? Or any other planet in the universe?

[Obey]

Originally Posted by Krhyme Killz

smh....do you think?

think about the cause and effect. rather than saying 'Earth is perfect for humans'...think more along the lines of 'humans evolved here under the conditions that Earth has had...for MANY years'

when Earth was formed there were no humans...and the conditions would NOT have suited human life

Then why doesn't Mars develop conditions for human life to prosper there? Or any other planet in the universe?

@Obey there are several accounts of earth like planets billions of light years away from us, which, in theory, are capable of supporting life. The universe is infinitely expanding at exponential rates, and has been for billions and billions of years. To assume that no other planet can support life, only because we have not observed such a planet is ignorant.

@Obey there are several accounts of earth like planets billions of light years away from us, which, in theory, are capable of supporting life. The universe is infinitely expanding at exponential rates, and has been for billions and billions of years. To assume that no other planet can support life, only because we have not observed such a planet is ignorant.

[Spooky Deep]

Originally Posted by BLNK

What is a creator, then, @SpookyDeep

And, that's exactly what the bible states. Lol. And by the last portion, which I assume was the edit, do you mean the incredibly dense singularity from which our universe expanded, or the outlying dimensional planes beyond the foundational structure of said universe?

creator

a person or thing that creates.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/creator?s=t

lol I know what the Bible states. I was only showing there was a hole in your logic. What you said was an implication was merely an assumption. You can't make assumptions & expect someone to accept your logic.

[Spooky Deep]

Originally Posted by BLNK

What is a creator, then, @SpookyDeep

And, that's exactly what the bible states. Lol. And by the last portion, which I assume was the edit, do you mean the incredibly dense singularity from which our universe expanded, or the outlying dimensional planes beyond the foundational structure of said universe?

creator

a person or thing that creates.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/creator?s=t

lol I know what the Bible states. I was only showing there was a hole in your logic. What you said was an implication was merely an assumption. You can't make assumptions & expect someone to accept your logic.

[Krhyme Killz]

Originally Posted by Obey

Then why doesn't Mars develop conditions for human life to prosper there? Or any other planet in the universe?

why do you focus so much on humans?

would you consider yourself any different than any other plant or animal?

humans are one species out of countless species. A shark cant live on land, we cant live in the water, some creature from a far away galaxy cant live on Earth, and we cant live there...

we all are just were we should be because its the only place we can be..we were created and evolved by our environment

[Krhyme Killz]

Originally Posted by Obey

Then why doesn't Mars develop conditions for human life to prosper there? Or any other planet in the universe?

why do you focus so much on humans?

would you consider yourself any different than any other plant or animal?

humans are one species out of countless species. A shark cant live on land, we cant live in the water, some creature from a far away galaxy cant live on Earth, and we cant live there...

we all are just were we should be because its the only place we can be..we were created and evolved by our environment

[Godbody]

There could be tons of planets with beings living on them, you're stupid as fuck if you don't think so

The Pope himself acknowledges UFO's, which in a sense trumps the Bible.

The Pope is also reforming the church to accept homosexuality. Again, trumping his own religious book. This of course only applies if you're Catholic. Since Christians don't have a Pope.

We can't reach a lot of these planets but we can pick up images from telescopes and advanced technology that can.

& There is a creator because science itself is created. That's why EVERY scientist has to come to a dead end. They rack their brains with "this created this, so we gotta found out what created that"

Eventually they get stumped and realize divine intervention took place because for space to exist there had to be a creator. Whether you want to personify that creator (which I dont) is up to you. But to say there isn't a creator is extremely foolish. If there wasn't a creator we'd have all the answers we need through science. Science cannot answer everything

[Godbody]

There could be tons of planets with beings living on them, you're stupid as fuck if you don't think so

The Pope himself acknowledges UFO's, which in a sense trumps the Bible.

The Pope is also reforming the church to accept homosexuality. Again, trumping his own religious book. This of course only applies if you're Catholic. Since Christians don't have a Pope.

We can't reach a lot of these planets but we can pick up images from telescopes and advanced technology that can.

& There is a creator because science itself is created. That's why EVERY scientist has to come to a dead end. They rack their brains with "this created this, so we gotta found out what created that"

Eventually they get stumped and realize divine intervention took place because for space to exist there had to be a creator. Whether you want to personify that creator (which I dont) is up to you. But to say there isn't a creator is extremely foolish. If there wasn't a creator we'd have all the answers we need through science. Science cannot answer everything

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

creator

a person or thing that creates.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/creator?s=t

lol I know what the Bible states. I was only showing there was a hole in your logic. What you said was an implication was merely an assumption. You can't make assumptions & expect someone to accept your logic.

And things are incapable of showing human characteristics?

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

creator

a person or thing that creates.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/creator?s=t

lol I know what the Bible states. I was only showing there was a hole in your logic. What you said was an implication was merely an assumption. You can't make assumptions & expect someone to accept your logic.

And things are incapable of showing human characteristics?