EtH for HOF

y'all are basically just buddy voting at this point. punk is track hof. nothing to do with battles. and to be fair punk at least got himself a title, and has beaten another HOF member a few times in an actual battle.

do what you want, i mean, i know rules standard for hof and the votes have it at a hard no, but i'm seriously concerned about the new basis for "better" which apparently means putting people we like in hof because they were never going to actually earn it.

y'all are basically just buddy voting at this point. punk is track hof. nothing to do with battles. and to be fair punk at least got himself a title, and has beaten another HOF member a few times in an actual battle.

do what you want, i mean, i know rules standard for hof and the votes have it at a hard no, but i'm seriously concerned about the new basis for "better" which apparently means putting people we like in hof because they were never going to actually earn it.

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by korvus

y'all are basically just buddy voting at this point. punk is track hof. nothing to do with battles. and to be fair punk at least got himself a title, and has beaten another HOF member a few times in an actual battle.

do what you want, i mean, i know rules standard for hof and the votes have it at a hard no, but i'm seriously concerned about the new basis for "better" which apparently means putting people we like in hof because they were never going to actually earn it.

Guts re-checking the polls that clearly reads 12 yes, 9 no like

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by korvus

y'all are basically just buddy voting at this point. punk is track hof. nothing to do with battles. and to be fair punk at least got himself a title, and has beaten another HOF member a few times in an actual battle.

do what you want, i mean, i know rules standard for hof and the votes have it at a hard no, but i'm seriously concerned about the new basis for "better" which apparently means putting people we like in hof because they were never going to actually earn it.

Guts re-checking the polls that clearly reads 12 yes, 9 no like

Originally Posted by Rowdy Punk

Guts re-checking the polls that clearly reads 12 yes, 9 no like

the ratio has to be close to 90%

12 to 9 doesn't equal that, and maybe isn't even considered either way. it's never an option in typical hof threads.

Originally Posted by Rowdy Punk

Guts re-checking the polls that clearly reads 12 yes, 9 no like

the ratio has to be close to 90%

12 to 9 doesn't equal that, and maybe isn't even considered either way. it's never an option in typical hof threads.

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by korvus

the ratio has to be close to 90%

12 to 9 doesn't equal that, and maybe isn't even considered either way. it's never an option in typical hof threads.

Voting isn't over yet play boy. I'm sure @RULE would make an exception. Fact is, like Aggo said, you ignore everyone with valid reasons on why he should be HOF. But then again, you just started using letsbeef what a year or 2 ago?

In LB years, you were born yesterday

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by korvus

the ratio has to be close to 90%

12 to 9 doesn't equal that, and maybe isn't even considered either way. it's never an option in typical hof threads.

Voting isn't over yet play boy. I'm sure @RULE would make an exception. Fact is, like Aggo said, you ignore everyone with valid reasons on why he should be HOF. But then again, you just started using letsbeef what a year or 2 ago?

In LB years, you were born yesterday

Originally Posted by Rowdy Punk

Voting isn't over yet play boy. I'm sure @RULE would make an exception. Fact is, like Aggo said, you ignore everyone with valid reasons on why he should be HOF. But then again, you just started using letsbeef what a year or 2 ago?

In LB years, you were born yesterday

there were no valid reasons to me. lock made the best case. and this is basically turning into punk and friends try to force their way and fuck guts, so i'm out.

Originally Posted by Rowdy Punk

Voting isn't over yet play boy. I'm sure @RULE would make an exception. Fact is, like Aggo said, you ignore everyone with valid reasons on why he should be HOF. But then again, you just started using letsbeef what a year or 2 ago?

In LB years, you were born yesterday

there were no valid reasons to me. lock made the best case. and this is basically turning into punk and friends try to force their way and fuck guts, so i'm out.

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by korvus

there were no valid reasons to me. lock made the best case. and this is basically turning into punk and friends try to force their way and fuck guts, so i'm out.

Seriously you gotta stop Slobbing Lockhart down. But yeah, please leave. This don't concern you, new booty.

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by korvus

there were no valid reasons to me. lock made the best case. and this is basically turning into punk and friends try to force their way and fuck guts, so i'm out.

Seriously you gotta stop Slobbing Lockhart down. But yeah, please leave. This don't concern you, new booty.