King Titles

[Student]

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

[Student]

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Student

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

Nope not the equivalant at all.

Knock out tournaments and battle cards are completely different.

If i arrange a battle with DaDDiO and he doesnt reply does that mean i won? of course not.

You WIN battles by WINNING.

You advance in tournaments.

Clear difference.


This argument is all irrelevant anyway.

The only question that matters should be WHAT IS THE CRITERIA TO BE KING?

I was told 7 title match wins. I have 7 title match wins.

If y'all want different i have NO PROBLEM losing the title.

Just make a decision lol

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Student

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

Nope not the equivalant at all.

Knock out tournaments and battle cards are completely different.

If i arrange a battle with DaDDiO and he doesnt reply does that mean i won? of course not.

You WIN battles by WINNING.

You advance in tournaments.

Clear difference.


This argument is all irrelevant anyway.

The only question that matters should be WHAT IS THE CRITERIA TO BE KING?

I was told 7 title match wins. I have 7 title match wins.

If y'all want different i have NO PROBLEM losing the title.

Just make a decision lol

Originally Posted by Student

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

No, it's not. Lol, this is the definition of comparing apples to oranges.

Originally Posted by Student

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

No, it's not. Lol, this is the definition of comparing apples to oranges.