O_G for Hall of Fame

[J u s T C]

Why the fuck you gotta constantly argue the toss over someones vote? Thats not how it's supposed to work you know.....

[J u s T C]

Why the fuck you gotta constantly argue the toss over someones vote? Thats not how it's supposed to work you know.....

[Godbody]

Originally Posted by Indianapolis Jones

Why the fuck you gotta constantly argue the toss over someones vote? Thats not how it's supposed to work you know.....

What does this even mean

Nobody's arguing anything. Most people agree that O_G has put in quality work over the last decade

People like EtH come to shake shit up and make others unsure in their opinions is all. Its evident in the thread where people say one thing and in a later post waver in their opinion and show uncertainty

Let it be known I dont fuck with O_G outside of here, never even talked to the nigga. But EtH and I are more qualified than most to have a solid opinion on O_G since we've been here his entire stay. So when someone of EtH's stature/prestige on this website downplays a veteran like O_G or downplays someone's accolades period its a bad look, because it skews the opinion for niggas that have been here 4-5 yrs and shit. They can't be bothered to give O_G's shit a listen when a niggas hating so hard and convincing others he aint shit.

yet I see open battles posted and get responded to in 2 days
O_G will post an open battle and it gets a response 5 days later lol

[Godbody]

Originally Posted by Indianapolis Jones

Why the fuck you gotta constantly argue the toss over someones vote? Thats not how it's supposed to work you know.....

What does this even mean

Nobody's arguing anything. Most people agree that O_G has put in quality work over the last decade

People like EtH come to shake shit up and make others unsure in their opinions is all. Its evident in the thread where people say one thing and in a later post waver in their opinion and show uncertainty

Let it be known I dont fuck with O_G outside of here, never even talked to the nigga. But EtH and I are more qualified than most to have a solid opinion on O_G since we've been here his entire stay. So when someone of EtH's stature/prestige on this website downplays a veteran like O_G or downplays someone's accolades period its a bad look, because it skews the opinion for niggas that have been here 4-5 yrs and shit. They can't be bothered to give O_G's shit a listen when a niggas hating so hard and convincing others he aint shit.

yet I see open battles posted and get responded to in 2 days
O_G will post an open battle and it gets a response 5 days later lol

I had a listen to O_G recently and he's really really good. Would be a problem for most to contend with.

The problem is that it's not like O_G has just appeared out of nowhere. He's been battling the whole time. Does he have the skill to be HOF? For sure. But where was O_G when these others guys were becoming Hall of Fame legends? Where was O_G when we saw Phil and Stricc taking over the site?

O_G was never really in the discussion. He wasn't considered the top threat at any point. I think the guy has the potential to be that guy. He would need to get some momentum and take out the other top guys.

I know O_G is gonna read it and be raging that he has beat HOFers...so have all of us. But to be able to consistently be considered the best on the site IS what the Hall of Fame is all about, and at least from my end O_G just wasn't really ever in that conversation.

It's nothing against the guys abilities or what he can do. But you can't even closely compare the achievements of Phil Banks to the achievements of O_G. Different realms, and Banks is the realm of HOFers.

I had a listen to O_G recently and he's really really good. Would be a problem for most to contend with.

The problem is that it's not like O_G has just appeared out of nowhere. He's been battling the whole time. Does he have the skill to be HOF? For sure. But where was O_G when these others guys were becoming Hall of Fame legends? Where was O_G when we saw Phil and Stricc taking over the site?

O_G was never really in the discussion. He wasn't considered the top threat at any point. I think the guy has the potential to be that guy. He would need to get some momentum and take out the other top guys.

I know O_G is gonna read it and be raging that he has beat HOFers...so have all of us. But to be able to consistently be considered the best on the site IS what the Hall of Fame is all about, and at least from my end O_G just wasn't really ever in that conversation.

It's nothing against the guys abilities or what he can do. But you can't even closely compare the achievements of Phil Banks to the achievements of O_G. Different realms, and Banks is the realm of HOFers.

Originally Posted by EtH

I had a listen to O_G recently and he's really really good. Would be a problem for most to contend with.

The problem is that it's not like O_G has just appeared out of nowhere. He's been battling the whole time. Does he have the skill to be HOF? For sure. But where was O_G when these others guys were becoming Hall of Fame legends? Where was O_G when we saw Phil and Stricc taking over the site?

O_G was never really in the discussion. He wasn't considered the top threat at any point. I think the guy has the potential to be that guy. He would need to get some momentum and take out the other top guys.

I know O_G is gonna read it and be raging that he has beat HOFers...so have all of us. But to be able to consistently be considered the best on the site IS what the Hall of Fame is all about, and at least from my end O_G just wasn't really ever in that conversation.

It's nothing against the guys abilities or what he can do. But you can't even closely compare the achievements of Phil Banks to the achievements of O_G. Different realms, and Banks is the realm of HOFers.

This. O_G is incredibly talented bar-wise, for sure.

Originally Posted by EtH

I had a listen to O_G recently and he's really really good. Would be a problem for most to contend with.

The problem is that it's not like O_G has just appeared out of nowhere. He's been battling the whole time. Does he have the skill to be HOF? For sure. But where was O_G when these others guys were becoming Hall of Fame legends? Where was O_G when we saw Phil and Stricc taking over the site?

O_G was never really in the discussion. He wasn't considered the top threat at any point. I think the guy has the potential to be that guy. He would need to get some momentum and take out the other top guys.

I know O_G is gonna read it and be raging that he has beat HOFers...so have all of us. But to be able to consistently be considered the best on the site IS what the Hall of Fame is all about, and at least from my end O_G just wasn't really ever in that conversation.

It's nothing against the guys abilities or what he can do. But you can't even closely compare the achievements of Phil Banks to the achievements of O_G. Different realms, and Banks is the realm of HOFers.

This. O_G is incredibly talented bar-wise, for sure.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Godbody

What does this even mean

Nobody's arguing anything. Most people agree that O_G has put in quality work over the last decade

People like EtH come to shake shit up and make others unsure in their opinions is all. Its evident in the thread where people say one thing and in a later post waver in their opinion and show uncertainty

Let it be known I dont fuck with O_G outside of here, never even talked to the nigga. But EtH and I are more qualified than most to have a solid opinion on O_G since we've been here his entire stay. So when someone of EtH's stature/prestige on this website downplays a veteran like O_G or downplays someone's accolades period its a bad look, because it skews the opinion for niggas that have been here 4-5 yrs and shit. They can't be bothered to give O_G's shit a listen when a niggas hating so hard and convincing others he aint shit.

yet I see open battles posted and get responded to in 2 days
O_G will post an open battle and it gets a response 5 days later lol

But it's his opinion/Vote, which is what you asked for. I mean you praise his prestige and time served which only validates his vote even more. Just to downplay it at the same time as "damaging" based off what? Speculation or a hunch that he's salty and or trolling?


You ever considered that the whole terms for entry are so vague and wishy washy that someone might agree with you talentwise but that this isn't near enough for entry? I dunno like notable wins, streaks, reigns and titles ect ect ect and not just to be a dickhead.


Eth never struck me as the type to screw someone out of a vote for HoF just because he's Eth and Eth's an "Edgy" twat.



A guy who brought or tried to bring topicals to the fore and had a crew dedicated to help improve new guys which a lot of them are more than holding their own over the last few years btw and was a full on mod. . A trolly dick he might be but history suggests he doesn't take that narrow minded approach on subjects such as this, unless provoked. Like having his vote discredited because you can't get past your feelings that he's PROBALY trolling.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Godbody

What does this even mean

Nobody's arguing anything. Most people agree that O_G has put in quality work over the last decade

People like EtH come to shake shit up and make others unsure in their opinions is all. Its evident in the thread where people say one thing and in a later post waver in their opinion and show uncertainty

Let it be known I dont fuck with O_G outside of here, never even talked to the nigga. But EtH and I are more qualified than most to have a solid opinion on O_G since we've been here his entire stay. So when someone of EtH's stature/prestige on this website downplays a veteran like O_G or downplays someone's accolades period its a bad look, because it skews the opinion for niggas that have been here 4-5 yrs and shit. They can't be bothered to give O_G's shit a listen when a niggas hating so hard and convincing others he aint shit.

yet I see open battles posted and get responded to in 2 days
O_G will post an open battle and it gets a response 5 days later lol

But it's his opinion/Vote, which is what you asked for. I mean you praise his prestige and time served which only validates his vote even more. Just to downplay it at the same time as "damaging" based off what? Speculation or a hunch that he's salty and or trolling?


You ever considered that the whole terms for entry are so vague and wishy washy that someone might agree with you talentwise but that this isn't near enough for entry? I dunno like notable wins, streaks, reigns and titles ect ect ect and not just to be a dickhead.


Eth never struck me as the type to screw someone out of a vote for HoF just because he's Eth and Eth's an "Edgy" twat.



A guy who brought or tried to bring topicals to the fore and had a crew dedicated to help improve new guys which a lot of them are more than holding their own over the last few years btw and was a full on mod. . A trolly dick he might be but history suggests he doesn't take that narrow minded approach on subjects such as this, unless provoked. Like having his vote discredited because you can't get past your feelings that he's PROBALY trolling.