correcting unfair votes

[NOBLE]

This is a bad idea for several reasons, first and foremost being that only the opinions of about 5-6 people in the entire site would matter in battles. Secondly, just because someone is a mod does not necessarily mean they they are the best voter out there or even that they are a good voter at all. I've seen mods who were shitty voters. Third, LB mods are volunteers. They are not paid to mod the site...they do this out of love. Like anyone else, they don't love every battle. They love only the good ones, which are few and far in between. Expecting them to read/listen and vote on shitty battle after shitty battle (which the vast majority of battles are) every single day is not sustainable. They will get burned out and you will see a high turnover rate among staff.

[NOBLE]

This is a bad idea for several reasons, first and foremost being that only the opinions of about 5-6 people in the entire site would matter in battles. Secondly, just because someone is a mod does not necessarily mean they they are the best voter out there or even that they are a good voter at all. I've seen mods who were shitty voters. Third, LB mods are volunteers. They are not paid to mod the site...they do this out of love. Like anyone else, they don't love every battle. They love only the good ones, which are few and far in between. Expecting them to read/listen and vote on shitty battle after shitty battle (which the vast majority of battles are) every single day is not sustainable. They will get burned out and you will see a high turnover rate among staff.