FVC Contests Archives.

[NOBLE]

@JOSH™ vs @GRizzEAT
Battle: Prince wood vs Sick Ritual
GRizzEAT Voted: Prince wood: 3 / Sick Ritual: 5
JOSH™ Voted: Prince wood: 1 / Sick Ritual: 3
You were both spot on in terms of what you pointed out that was wrong with each verse. JOSH went a little bit more into details, which could have been helpful. GRizzEAT, I felt your ratings for the battlers were too high. JOSH, I liked that you offered them ways of improving, but I honestly don't think these guys are at the stage where they can benefit from reading a RULE or UA battle. They have to first understand basic concepts like how to form a punch and add complexity before they'll know what to look for when they read examples from someone who does it well. In this match, I felt JOSH brought more to his vote. Vote: JOSH™

---------- Post added 09-01-2012 at 12:02 AM ---------- Previous post was 08-31-2012 at 11:44 PM ----------

@Xplissit vs @MadVerbs
Battle: NothingTwoSeaHear vs DrFunny
MadVerbs Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 3 / DrFunny: 4
Xplissit Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 2 / DrFunny: 3
MadVerbs, your expo was short, concise and straight to the point. I kind of wish you had been a bit more direct and personalized though. Xplissit, your expo was way too long. Bar for bar is usually the best type of expo, but in this case where there was an obvious winner and both battlers aren't really that strong or complex, I didn't feel it was necessary. Plus when you do bar for bar breakdowns, copying and pasting the battler's own lines only makes the expo bloated. You could have simply referred to the bars without repeating each one. Decent votes from both, but I felt Xplissit brought a little more to the vote here. Vote: Xplissit

[NOBLE]

@JOSH™ vs @GRizzEAT
Battle: Prince wood vs Sick Ritual
GRizzEAT Voted: Prince wood: 3 / Sick Ritual: 5
JOSH™ Voted: Prince wood: 1 / Sick Ritual: 3
You were both spot on in terms of what you pointed out that was wrong with each verse. JOSH went a little bit more into details, which could have been helpful. GRizzEAT, I felt your ratings for the battlers were too high. JOSH, I liked that you offered them ways of improving, but I honestly don't think these guys are at the stage where they can benefit from reading a RULE or UA battle. They have to first understand basic concepts like how to form a punch and add complexity before they'll know what to look for when they read examples from someone who does it well. In this match, I felt JOSH brought more to his vote. Vote: JOSH™

---------- Post added 09-01-2012 at 12:02 AM ---------- Previous post was 08-31-2012 at 11:44 PM ----------

@Xplissit vs @MadVerbs
Battle: NothingTwoSeaHear vs DrFunny
MadVerbs Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 3 / DrFunny: 4
Xplissit Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 2 / DrFunny: 3
MadVerbs, your expo was short, concise and straight to the point. I kind of wish you had been a bit more direct and personalized though. Xplissit, your expo was way too long. Bar for bar is usually the best type of expo, but in this case where there was an obvious winner and both battlers aren't really that strong or complex, I didn't feel it was necessary. Plus when you do bar for bar breakdowns, copying and pasting the battler's own lines only makes the expo bloated. You could have simply referred to the bars without repeating each one. Decent votes from both, but I felt Xplissit brought a little more to the vote here. Vote: Xplissit