Staff in Question pt. 5 - RULE has been REBORN - Page 5 - Lets Beef

**Aggo** · #1 12-22-2019, 07:04 PM

I dont think you should battle yourself. Its deceitful and fuckey. That said, get rid of multis and that, and a whole mess of other, problem is solved.

---------- Post added at 07:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:03 PM ----------

#BANMULTIS

**Aggo** · 12-22-2019, 07:04 PM

I dont think you should battle yourself. Its deceitful and fuckey. That said, get rid of multis and that, and a whole mess of other, problem is solved.

---------- Post added at 07:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:03 PM ----------

#BANMULTIS

#2 12-22-2019, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aggo

I dont think you should battle yourself. Its deceitful and fuckey. That said, get rid of multis and that, and a whole mess of other, problem is solved.

---------- Post added at 07:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:03 PM ----------

#BANMULTIS

banning multis is not the solution. a lot of people use the for respectable reasons. what about your boy whackula? just because there are some rotten apples doesn't mean we kill the crop

solution: all multis have to confirm with staff who they are and all staff must confirm with the site who they multis are.

12-22-2019, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aggo

I dont think you should battle yourself. Its deceitful and fuckey. That said, get rid of multis and that, and a whole mess of other, problem is solved.

---------- Post added at 07:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:03 PM ----------

#BANMULTIS

banning multis is not the solution. a lot of people use the for respectable reasons. what about your boy whackula? just because there are some rotten apples doesn't mean we kill the crop

solution: all multis have to confirm with staff who they are and all staff must confirm with the site who they multis are.

**Óðinn** · #3 12-22-2019, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guts

must confirm with the site who they multis are.

Fine...

2FUEL = Q.

**Óðinn** · 12-22-2019, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guts

must confirm with the site who they multis are.

Fine...

2FUEL = Q.

**Autograph** · #4 12-22-2019, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2FUEL

Fine...

2FUEL = Q.

I’m shocked af. Had no clue.

**Autograph** · 12-22-2019, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2FUEL

Fine...

2FUEL = Q.

I’m shocked af. Had no clue.

**Autograph** · #5 12-22-2019, 07:34 PM

Auto = Uncle Joey

**Autograph** · 12-22-2019, 07:34 PM

Auto = Uncle Joey

#6 12-22-2019, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autograph

Auto = Uncle Joey

haha respect.

12-22-2019, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autograph

Auto = Uncle Joey

haha respect.

#7 12-22-2019, 07:53 PM

So Danny Tanner, who's become almost a folk hero of sorts and is not responsible for any cheating or anything nefarious, gets banned because of the retarded decisions of a few? Nah.

12-22-2019, 07:53 PM

So Danny Tanner, who's become almost a folk hero of sorts and is not responsible for any cheating or anything nefarious, gets banned because of the retarded decisions of a few? Nah.

**Aggo** · #8 12-22-2019, 08:45 PM

Sure there are people using multis for reasons that arent necessarily nefarious. But they arent necessary either. I know some people currently have, or have had in the past, all sorts of multis for various reasons. If we keep it to one active account per member, the site benefits.

---------- Post added at 08:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:41 PM ----------

Like I just got an IM from someone named The Determinator. He has 200+ battles on his profile but hes pretending to be new and need help. Now hes LOC. I cant stand shit like this. People want site activity and to make this place better, treat it with respect. Stop the bullshit.

#BANMULTIS
#STOPTHEBULLSHIT

**Aggo** · 12-22-2019, 08:45 PM

Sure there are people using multis for reasons that arent necessarily nefarious. But they arent necessary either. I know some people currently have, or have had in the past, all sorts of multis for various reasons. If we keep it to one active account per member, the site benefits.

---------- Post added at 08:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:41 PM ----------

Like I just got an IM from someone named The Determinator. He has 200+ battles on his profile but hes pretending to be new and need help. Now hes LOC. I cant stand shit like this. People want site activity and to make this place better, treat it with respect. Stop the bullshit.

#BANMULTIS
#STOPTHEBULLSHIT

**Edgeworth** · #9 12-22-2019, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aggo

Sure there are people using multis for reasons that arent necessarily nefarious. But they arent necessary either. I know some people currently have, or have had in the past, all sorts of multis for various reasons. If we keep it to one active account per member, the site benefits.

---------- Post added at 08:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:41 PM ----------

Like I just got an IM from someone named The Determinator. He has 200+ battles on his profile but hes pretending to be new and need help. Now hes LOC. I cant stand shit like this. People want site activity and to make this place better, treat it with respect. Stop the bullshit.

#BANMULTIS
#STOPTHEBULLSHIT

Its an interesting discussion to have for sure. How would you actually ban Multis, though?

Have X change LB server/system/inner workings to somehow make it physically impossible to have a multi? (I’m not sure if this is even possible)

Or just have mods ban any accounts that pop up as Multis? In that case, people get away with cheating in the first place because they use Multis that slip by the multi detector so you wouldn’t be catching them anyway. You’d only be banning Multis that people are willfully disclosing to staff (or if the cheater slips up, which is already protocol)

**Edgeworth** · 12-22-2019, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aggo

Sure there are people using multis for reasons that arent necessarily nefarious. But they arent necessary either. I know some people currently have, or have had in the past, all sorts of multis for various reasons. If we keep it to one active account per member, the site benefits.

---------- Post added at 08:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:41 PM ----------

Like I just got an IM from someone named The Determinator. He has 200+ battles on his profile but hes pretending to be new and need help. Now hes LOC. I cant stand shit like this. People want site activity and to make this place better, treat it with respect. Stop the bullshit.

#BANMULTIS
#STOPTHEBULLSHIT

Its an interesting discussion to have for sure. How would you actually ban Multis, though?

Have X change LB server/system/inner workings to somehow make it physically impossible to have a multi? (I’m not sure if this is even possible)

Or just have mods ban any accounts that pop up as Multis? In that case, people get away with cheating in the first place because they use Multis that slip by the multi detector so you wouldn’t be catching them anyway. You’d only be banning Multis that people are willfully disclosing to staff (or if the cheater slips up, which is already protocol)

**TKtheGREAT** · #10 12-22-2019, 08:57 PM

I'm open to banning multies or maybe cappin it at 1. But I dont have a multi. But if its causing this much drama #byefelicia

**TKtheGREAT** · 12-22-2019, 08:57 PM

I'm open to banning multies or maybe cappin it at 1. But I dont have a multi. But if its causing this much drama #byefelicia


	Start a battle Audio or Text or Video Vote on a battle to earn +1 credit!