Should we get rid of the 1-10 scale?

[Denton]

1-5 is definitely more fitting.

[Denton]

1-5 is definitely more fitting.

[SAND]

That should be optional. We shouldn't HAVE to rate them. If they wanna know what they're rated, that's desperate. Imo

:shrugs:

[SAND]

That should be optional. We shouldn't HAVE to rate them. If they wanna know what they're rated, that's desperate. Imo

:shrugs:

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Jason

im not a fan of the 1-5 rating scale though, seems to me like its substituting one problem for another

This. I know I can be a stubborn bastard but it's making my head hurt how people aren't getting that. We might as well leave the system as is if that's the solution.

I'd like someone to explain in favour of a 1 to 5 as to why it would make a significant enough change to justify putting in the time and effort replacing the current system with it. Because from where I'm sitting it's exactly the same system.

What do the numbers bring? they aren't required to pick a winner. they wont be required to make the hotlist. they just get in the way and cause problems. and a 1 to 5 will be exactly the same because your still rating people by numbers rather than with feedback.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Jason

im not a fan of the 1-5 rating scale though, seems to me like its substituting one problem for another

This. I know I can be a stubborn bastard but it's making my head hurt how people aren't getting that. We might as well leave the system as is if that's the solution.

I'd like someone to explain in favour of a 1 to 5 as to why it would make a significant enough change to justify putting in the time and effort replacing the current system with it. Because from where I'm sitting it's exactly the same system.

What do the numbers bring? they aren't required to pick a winner. they wont be required to make the hotlist. they just get in the way and cause problems. and a 1 to 5 will be exactly the same because your still rating people by numbers rather than with feedback.

[UhMAZING]

It could work...but the battles would have to be heavily monitored by Mods. Just to make it fair and make sure people are not simply voting for one side or the other for a "Credit" or if 2 or more emcees are beefing..and one blatantly "hate" votes. Not everyone leaves a expo of why they thought 1 or the other won..Like Stu said, people just go on battles and say "Gb, Vb" half the time without even reviewing a verse let alone giving an expo of why that person won. Just a quicc rate for a quicc Credit. There'd be a lot of work involved in this conversion.

[UhMAZING]

It could work...but the battles would have to be heavily monitored by Mods. Just to make it fair and make sure people are not simply voting for one side or the other for a "Credit" or if 2 or more emcees are beefing..and one blatantly "hate" votes. Not everyone leaves a expo of why they thought 1 or the other won..Like Stu said, people just go on battles and say "Gb, Vb" half the time without even reviewing a verse let alone giving an expo of why that person won. Just a quicc rate for a quicc Credit. There'd be a lot of work involved in this conversion.

[The Dope Man]

I like Rule's suggestion on tha 1-5 voting system. We need sometime of rating system & 1-5 would shorten up and most likely change alot of arguments..It'd be good to experiment that before completely getting rid of the number rates in general.

~1~

[The Dope Man]

I like Rule's suggestion on tha 1-5 voting system. We need sometime of rating system & 1-5 would shorten up and most likely change alot of arguments..It'd be good to experiment that before completely getting rid of the number rates in general.

~1~

get rid of it baby boy

get rid of it baby boy

[ILLoKWENT]

This site is probably the first site ive been on to have a mandatory rating system being implemented.. its really unnecesary tbh..the best solution would be to eliminate it entirely and make members more accountable to how they vote.. if a poor voting expo such as fvgb gets deleted.. the person that dropped that vote loses the credit for it. Which would make peeps think twice About tryin to get the easy credit..also more overturned battles if somehow poor votes slip thru the cracks but is adressed via complaints.. not to mention expos should be hidden cept to the battlers.and lastly. Have an option menu in the mod tools. To determine the reason for the vote deletion.. whether its 1.bad or poor vote. 2. For other reasons... and if the member gets too many votes deleted by mods. Then an algorithm will lower his vp automatically for every 10 poor votes.. etc.. on top of mod descretion

[ILLoKWENT]

This site is probably the first site ive been on to have a mandatory rating system being implemented.. its really unnecesary tbh..the best solution would be to eliminate it entirely and make members more accountable to how they vote.. if a poor voting expo such as fvgb gets deleted.. the person that dropped that vote loses the credit for it. Which would make peeps think twice About tryin to get the easy credit..also more overturned battles if somehow poor votes slip thru the cracks but is adressed via complaints.. not to mention expos should be hidden cept to the battlers.and lastly. Have an option menu in the mod tools. To determine the reason for the vote deletion.. whether its 1.bad or poor vote. 2. For other reasons... and if the member gets too many votes deleted by mods. Then an algorithm will lower his vp automatically for every 10 poor votes.. etc.. on top of mod descretion

[Phracture]

i don't really see a problem in the 1-10 tbh, everyone has their own opinion period, I think all votes should be hidden as they are In tourneys though .

[Phracture]

i don't really see a problem in the 1-10 tbh, everyone has their own opinion period, I think all votes should be hidden as they are In tourneys though .

[Mr-Felon]

Ok The trackside is Already hurting as it is and has been for a good amount of time.....So now you want to Alter the rate system?How is that going to bring life into the Trackside?If it won't then exactly what would be the point?I believe all these "Alterations"to the site as a whole has been a part of its Downfall and if you don't think Letsbeef.coms went to shit activity wise then you're blind.........IF IT'S NOT BROKE WHY FIX IT? ps we all know people on the tracksides don't even care really about getting 10/10 5 stars its more on "i wanna get as many plays as I can to make it to the top of most played"

---------- Post added at 01:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:29 PM ----------

Ps just seems pointless to me

[Mr-Felon]

Ok The trackside is Already hurting as it is and has been for a good amount of time.....So now you want to Alter the rate system?How is that going to bring life into the Trackside?If it won't then exactly what would be the point?I believe all these "Alterations"to the site as a whole has been a part of its Downfall and if you don't think Letsbeef.coms went to shit activity wise then you're blind.........IF IT'S NOT BROKE WHY FIX IT? ps we all know people on the tracksides don't even care really about getting 10/10 5 stars its more on "i wanna get as many plays as I can to make it to the top of most played"

---------- Post added at 01:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:29 PM ----------

Ps just seems pointless to me

[AmBitiousFlow]

Decent idea...I always thought only certain people could vote on certain battles...like set up a:

LIGHTWEIGHT DIVISION: For beginners, new users and only they can vote on LIGHTWEIGHT DIVISION BATTLES

MIDDLEWEIGHT DIVISION: For Rookies starting to make a presence on the site and they can only vote on MIDDLEWEIGHT BATTLES & LIGHTWEIGHT BATTLES

HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION: For battlers with Heavyweight status and only other Heavyweight battlers can vote in the HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION, MIDDLEWEIGHT DIVISION, AND LIGHTWEIGHT DIVISION...

You would have to embed a system to determine the skill level of a battler of course and may require some extra coding but its something I've always thought would bring some more activity and motivation to the site while also bettering the voting system by not allowing "noobs" vote on "Vets" battles with 5's and shit when they dont understand the bars!

@RULE @Just C @Dissizit @Mindless @Pugz @ILLoKWENT @Phil Banks @ALL MODS/ADMINS @LETSBEEF!!!!!!!!!!!

[AmBitiousFlow]

Decent idea...I always thought only certain people could vote on certain battles...like set up a:

LIGHTWEIGHT DIVISION: For beginners, new users and only they can vote on LIGHTWEIGHT DIVISION BATTLES

MIDDLEWEIGHT DIVISION: For Rookies starting to make a presence on the site and they can only vote on MIDDLEWEIGHT BATTLES & LIGHTWEIGHT BATTLES

HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION: For battlers with Heavyweight status and only other Heavyweight battlers can vote in the HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION, MIDDLEWEIGHT DIVISION, AND LIGHTWEIGHT DIVISION...

You would have to embed a system to determine the skill level of a battler of course and may require some extra coding but its something I've always thought would bring some more activity and motivation to the site while also bettering the voting system by not allowing "noobs" vote on "Vets" battles with 5's and shit when they dont understand the bars!

@RULE @Just C @Dissizit @Mindless @Pugz @ILLoKWENT @Phil Banks @ALL MODS/ADMINS @LETSBEEF!!!!!!!!!!!