Fair Voter's Club.

I'm just clowning, fam. Path /is/ a faggot, though.

I'm just clowning, fam. Path /is/ a faggot, though.

@CakedOut, that's not why you have 0 vp.

I got banned for hate voting, I have PMed MSNed and commented for votes, I once voted for myself. Now I have all the power in the world. Fuck the past nigga.

@CakedOut, that's not why you have 0 vp.

I got banned for hate voting, I have PMed MSNed and commented for votes, I once voted for myself. Now I have all the power in the world. Fuck the past nigga.

[-iNSTiNCT-]

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini

@CakedOut you clearly didn't read the OP. I am against anyone who has been infracted for their voting being allowed in the FVC. @IV yes, that is the perfect example of this situation, but, not who I was referring to. @Letum would you want a member of the site who was banned for their voting, voting on one of YOUR battles with a raised VP such as that allotted to the FVC? @Row well, you just need to stay on topic. @Vesace LeBron you do, too. @Fidel Z what up, bro? @SMASHH shut the fuck up.

wow ... u really told me didnt u

[-iNSTiNCT-]

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini

@CakedOut you clearly didn't read the OP. I am against anyone who has been infracted for their voting being allowed in the FVC. @IV yes, that is the perfect example of this situation, but, not who I was referring to. @Letum would you want a member of the site who was banned for their voting, voting on one of YOUR battles with a raised VP such as that allotted to the FVC? @Row well, you just need to stay on topic. @Vesace LeBron you do, too. @Fidel Z what up, bro? @SMASHH shut the fuck up.

wow ... u really told me didnt u

@EtH this has nothing to do with modship. The FVC' MAIN purpose is to vote on battles. Why should there be any members with prior voting offenses? It makes no sense.

@SMASHH I told you to shut the fuck up.

@EtH this has nothing to do with modship. The FVC' MAIN purpose is to vote on battles. Why should there be any members with prior voting offenses? It makes no sense.

@SMASHH I told you to shut the fuck up.

I basically came up with the idea of the FVC despite those offences. I've also at multiple times been classed as the best voter on LB (not these days), was in the original FVC, was the only non mod in the secret FVC, was in the current incarnation of the FVC.

But yeah, hate voting UA in 2007 should have cost all of that.

I basically came up with the idea of the FVC despite those offences. I've also at multiple times been classed as the best voter on LB (not these days), was in the original FVC, was the only non mod in the secret FVC, was in the current incarnation of the FVC.

But yeah, hate voting UA in 2007 should have cost all of that.

[-iNSTiNCT-]

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini

@EtH this has nothing to do with modship. The FVC' MAIN purpose is to vote on battles. Why should there be any members with prior voting offenses? It makes no sense.

@SMASHH I told you to shut the fuck up.

ouch, there u go again.

[-iNSTiNCT-]

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini

@EtH this has nothing to do with modship. The FVC' MAIN purpose is to vote on battles. Why should there be any members with prior voting offenses? It makes no sense.

@SMASHH I told you to shut the fuck up.

ouch, there u go again.

Originally Posted by EtH

I basically came up with the idea of the FVC despite those offences. I've also at multiple times been classed as the best voter on LB (not these days), was in the original FVC, was the only non mod in the secret FVC, was in the current incarnation of the FVC.

But yeah, hate voting UA in 2007 should have cost all of that.

So, anyone, despite a history of poor voting should be allowed within a group whose primary focus on the site is exceptional, and fair voting? Yeah, makes sense. Side note, I was also in the original FVC.

Edit: @SMASHH shut the fuck up.

Originally Posted by EtH

I basically came up with the idea of the FVC despite those offences. I've also at multiple times been classed as the best voter on LB (not these days), was in the original FVC, was the only non mod in the secret FVC, was in the current incarnation of the FVC.

But yeah, hate voting UA in 2007 should have cost all of that.

So, anyone, despite a history of poor voting should be allowed within a group whose primary focus on the site is exceptional, and fair voting? Yeah, makes sense. Side note, I was also in the original FVC.

Edit: @SMASHH shut the fuck up.

There are factors taken into account when someone is being made an FVC member.

To start, you need to have a voting power above a certain amount. This means that if you got done for bad voting in the past, you'll have to work it back up. Since cakedout and Ohs are still shit voters, their pasts aren't going to be erased and they aren't allowed to be FVC. Once someone has proven their ability as a voter, in being fair and knowing what they're talking about, then they make FVC. FVC only carries 1vp higher than a normal voter, so it's not a big deal.

There are factors taken into account when someone is being made an FVC member.

To start, you need to have a voting power above a certain amount. This means that if you got done for bad voting in the past, you'll have to work it back up. Since cakedout and Ohs are still shit voters, their pasts aren't going to be erased and they aren't allowed to be FVC. Once someone has proven their ability as a voter, in being fair and knowing what they're talking about, then they make FVC. FVC only carries 1vp higher than a normal voter, so it's not a big deal.

It is a big deal if you have previously poor voters being trusted not to repeat that.

It is a big deal if you have previously poor voters being trusted not to repeat that.

[-iNSTiNCT-]

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini

So, anyone, despite a history of poor voting should be allowed within a group whose primary focus on the site is exceptional, and fair voting? Yeah, makes sense. Side note, I was also in the original FVC.

Edit: @SMASHH shut the fuck up.

try again, it might work this time

[-iNSTiNCT-]

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini

So, anyone, despite a history of poor voting should be allowed within a group whose primary focus on the site is exceptional, and fair voting? Yeah, makes sense. Side note, I was also in the original FVC.

Edit: @SMASHH shut the fuck up.

try again, it might work this time