King Titles

Technically live battle rappers still get paid if their opponents a no show

Technically live battle rappers still get paid if their opponents a no show

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Student

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

Nope not the equivalant at all.

Knock out tournaments and battle cards are completely different.

If i arrange a battle with DaDDiO and he doesnt reply does that mean i won? of course not.

You WIN battles by WINNING.

You advance in tournaments.

Clear difference.


This argument is all irrelevant anyway.

The only question that matters should be WHAT IS THE CRITERIA TO BE KING?

I was told 7 title match wins. I have 7 title match wins.

If y'all want different i have NO PROBLEM losing the title.

Just make a decision lol

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Student

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

Nope not the equivalant at all.

Knock out tournaments and battle cards are completely different.

If i arrange a battle with DaDDiO and he doesnt reply does that mean i won? of course not.

You WIN battles by WINNING.

You advance in tournaments.

Clear difference.


This argument is all irrelevant anyway.

The only question that matters should be WHAT IS THE CRITERIA TO BE KING?

I was told 7 title match wins. I have 7 title match wins.

If y'all want different i have NO PROBLEM losing the title.

Just make a decision lol

Originally Posted by Student

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

No, it's not. Lol, this is the definition of comparing apples to oranges.

Originally Posted by Student

Not counting no-shows is the equivalent of not letting a battler advance to the next round in a tournament because their opponent no-showed, fuck a boxing analogy this is LB, not the WBA.

No, it's not. Lol, this is the definition of comparing apples to oranges.

[EtH]

Can you all stop arguing 500 different points and just vote on the poll? Cheers.

[EtH]

Can you all stop arguing 500 different points and just vote on the poll? Cheers.

[Student]

While we're on the subject if LBA/LBT King is below or equivalent to a Secondary Championship then why is RULE's title above his GC and Seul's below everything.

Source:
https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128666

[Student]

While we're on the subject if LBA/LBT King is below or equivalent to a Secondary Championship then why is RULE's title above his GC and Seul's below everything.

Source:
https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128666

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Student

While we're on the subject if LBA/LBT King is below or equivalent to a Secondary Championship then why is RULE's title above his GC and Seul's below everything.

Source:
https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128666

Is this the thread i said i wouldnt comment on again? if so i apologise lol

Ive heard this before, the titles arent supposed to be listed in any certain order. Its up to the holder.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Student

While we're on the subject if LBA/LBT King is below or equivalent to a Secondary Championship then why is RULE's title above his GC and Seul's below everything.

Source:
https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128666

Is this the thread i said i wouldnt comment on again? if so i apologise lol

Ive heard this before, the titles arent supposed to be listed in any certain order. Its up to the holder.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by RULE

Is this the thread i said i wouldnt comment on again? if so i apologise lol

Ive heard this before, the titles arent supposed to be listed in any certain order. Its up to the holder.

They used to have an order though.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by RULE

Is this the thread i said i wouldnt comment on again? if so i apologise lol

Ive heard this before, the titles arent supposed to be listed in any certain order. Its up to the holder.

They used to have an order though.

[BizzyOne]

@Edgeworth

Vs BizzyOne (56%) - Lost the LBA Title

I didnt lose the title...i barely got that shit

[BizzyOne]

@Edgeworth

Vs BizzyOne (56%) - Lost the LBA Title

I didnt lose the title...i barely got that shit

[Malishus]

Originally Posted by Noir

Only person who deserves it is ILLo and even then, his hardest competition no showed.

That's facts

i appreciate the sentiment and i agree with u, i had 32s already written for both mandown and erupt. erupt wouldve been my toughest. its ok tho, i made it up with a 32 line win against Daddio..

---------- Post added at 11:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Rieper

That's not my point at all with this. I just find it incredibly weird how the challenge was made in the first place where he won't battle on his "retired" account. Is that serious? Is Esso gonna make a multi account and challenge the next guy who gets LBT King all of a sudden because he retired Esso? Shit's corny, imo.

i dont know what the fuck u are on about, eth talked to me about it, but there wasnt any concrete agreement on a battle or stipulation for that matter. and besides i agree shit would be corny if i called out rai to put up his title on the line against my multi acct... yes it would be an interesting matchup, but i said it once and ill say it again.. my ILLO acct is retired. . anyone want to battle me can see this acct..

[Malishus]

Originally Posted by Noir

Only person who deserves it is ILLo and even then, his hardest competition no showed.

That's facts

i appreciate the sentiment and i agree with u, i had 32s already written for both mandown and erupt. erupt wouldve been my toughest. its ok tho, i made it up with a 32 line win against Daddio..

---------- Post added at 11:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Rieper

That's not my point at all with this. I just find it incredibly weird how the challenge was made in the first place where he won't battle on his "retired" account. Is that serious? Is Esso gonna make a multi account and challenge the next guy who gets LBT King all of a sudden because he retired Esso? Shit's corny, imo.

i dont know what the fuck u are on about, eth talked to me about it, but there wasnt any concrete agreement on a battle or stipulation for that matter. and besides i agree shit would be corny if i called out rai to put up his title on the line against my multi acct... yes it would be an interesting matchup, but i said it once and ill say it again.. my ILLO acct is retired. . anyone want to battle me can see this acct..

Originally Posted by Malishus

i dont know what the fuck u are on about, eth talked to me about it, but there wasnt any concrete agreement on a battle or stipulation for that matter. and besides i agree shit would be corny if i called out rai to put up his title on the line against my multi acct... yes it would be an interesting matchup, but i said it once and ill say it again.. my ILLO acct is retired. . anyone want to battle me can see this acct..

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.

Originally Posted by Malishus

i dont know what the fuck u are on about, eth talked to me about it, but there wasnt any concrete agreement on a battle or stipulation for that matter. and besides i agree shit would be corny if i called out rai to put up his title on the line against my multi acct... yes it would be an interesting matchup, but i said it once and ill say it again.. my ILLO acct is retired. . anyone want to battle me can see this acct..

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.