i dont understand how u win lol

[Fredo Lombardi]

i'm blocked by a mod....who thinks my votes on his tracks were unfair....a 7 & 8....people really think they deserve tens shit is funny to me...I wont say his name just that he is damostfakest

[Fredo Lombardi]

i'm blocked by a mod....who thinks my votes on his tracks were unfair....a 7 & 8....people really think they deserve tens shit is funny to me...I wont say his name just that he is damostfakest

[Krhyme Killz]

D Reppin said that shit best

[Krhyme Killz]

D Reppin said that shit best

[Teek]

I see good n bad in both systems as I've experienced both on here firsthand.

The VP system has issues, but for the most part, it's a helluva lot more fair in the long run. I like the old way, because the OldSchool in me thinks every vote should be equal, but with all the cheating, riding etc, that way is absolute hell to manage effectively. People thinks they get a burn losing w more votes, I've seen bullshit verses blow up quality ones 10-1 in votes because guys would pull shit you couldn't prove.
It takes some adapting to but into the idea of VP, but it can work well.

[Teek]

I see good n bad in both systems as I've experienced both on here firsthand.

The VP system has issues, but for the most part, it's a helluva lot more fair in the long run. I like the old way, because the OldSchool in me thinks every vote should be equal, but with all the cheating, riding etc, that way is absolute hell to manage effectively. People thinks they get a burn losing w more votes, I've seen bullshit verses blow up quality ones 10-1 in votes because guys would pull shit you couldn't prove.
It takes some adapting to but into the idea of VP, but it can work well.

[D-Reppin]

Originally Posted by Teek

I see good n bad in both systems as I've experienced both on here firsthand.

The VP system has issues, but for the most part, it's a helluva lot more fair in the long run. I like the old way, because the OldSchool in me thinks every vote should be equal, but with all the cheating, riding etc, that way is absolute hell to manage effectively. People thinks they get a burn losing w more votes, I've seen bullshit verses blow up quality ones 10-1 in votes because guys would pull shit you couldn't prove.
It takes some adapting to but into the idea of VP, but it can work well.

Word

But honestly, I think the FVC is the biggest conspiracy i've ever come across. It almost certainly gives its members immunity from being voted against by each other. Not based on what i've seen, but based on what the system implies. Seeing that FVC votes weigh more than basic votes, it's even harder to outweigh the collective opinions. I don't know what to fully make of that system yet, but it's mad shady.

[D-Reppin]

Originally Posted by Teek

I see good n bad in both systems as I've experienced both on here firsthand.

The VP system has issues, but for the most part, it's a helluva lot more fair in the long run. I like the old way, because the OldSchool in me thinks every vote should be equal, but with all the cheating, riding etc, that way is absolute hell to manage effectively. People thinks they get a burn losing w more votes, I've seen bullshit verses blow up quality ones 10-1 in votes because guys would pull shit you couldn't prove.
It takes some adapting to but into the idea of VP, but it can work well.

Word

But honestly, I think the FVC is the biggest conspiracy i've ever come across. It almost certainly gives its members immunity from being voted against by each other. Not based on what i've seen, but based on what the system implies. Seeing that FVC votes weigh more than basic votes, it's even harder to outweigh the collective opinions. I don't know what to fully make of that system yet, but it's mad shady.

[COFFIN DODGER]

ok , lets see what votes i get for this one lol
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=446020

[COFFIN DODGER]

ok , lets see what votes i get for this one lol
http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=446020

[Krhyme Killz]

Peeped and voted. Hit me up if you re interested in some text advice

[Krhyme Killz]

Peeped and voted. Hit me up if you re interested in some text advice

[UNKNOWN ARTIST]

^^^ what size medal of honour do YOU wear?... Lol

[UNKNOWN ARTIST]

^^^ what size medal of honour do YOU wear?... Lol

[Krhyme Killz]

Hahaha..touche

[Krhyme Killz]

Hahaha..touche

[J u s T C]

The process to get into the FVC is un needed for me. If you're currently active voting your self and more importantly, if you've been here and active for a long time. You know who is a good voter and a bad 1 by judging them without them knowing in a much more organic way. You don't need to go through a long winded process of a "tournament" to find that out. Not just that but going back to the organic setting, by holding a tournament you're putting them under the spotlight for those few rounds to vote fair. Not because it's the right thing to do. But because they want to win, get a title and to have that raised VP. Once they've got that they just go back to "good battle vb" while dropping suspect votes (not all of them, but a lot do) they can them use the fact they have a higher VP and that they are in blockable to under cover hate vote. Then you get the people who think dropping a long ass expo makes them an educated voter, but when you read them it's nothing but filler and nonsense followed by from what I've seen popularity or sheep voting. There are very few GENUINELY educated and unbiased, unswayable voters on here, and none if very few of them are in the FVC, from what I've seen. Some of them who would never had seen the light of day when I was in charge. (There he goes again) Yeah well it is what it is.

[J u s T C]

The process to get into the FVC is un needed for me. If you're currently active voting your self and more importantly, if you've been here and active for a long time. You know who is a good voter and a bad 1 by judging them without them knowing in a much more organic way. You don't need to go through a long winded process of a "tournament" to find that out. Not just that but going back to the organic setting, by holding a tournament you're putting them under the spotlight for those few rounds to vote fair. Not because it's the right thing to do. But because they want to win, get a title and to have that raised VP. Once they've got that they just go back to "good battle vb" while dropping suspect votes (not all of them, but a lot do) they can them use the fact they have a higher VP and that they are in blockable to under cover hate vote. Then you get the people who think dropping a long ass expo makes them an educated voter, but when you read them it's nothing but filler and nonsense followed by from what I've seen popularity or sheep voting. There are very few GENUINELY educated and unbiased, unswayable voters on here, and none if very few of them are in the FVC, from what I've seen. Some of them who would never had seen the light of day when I was in charge. (There he goes again) Yeah well it is what it is.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by Just C

Some of them who would never had seen the light of day when I was in charge. (There he goes again) Yeah well it is what it is.

Some of the ppl you had in the FVC while you were in charge shouldn't of been there either corb.... the likes of Blocc ect.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by Just C

Some of them who would never had seen the light of day when I was in charge. (There he goes again) Yeah well it is what it is.

Some of the ppl you had in the FVC while you were in charge shouldn't of been there either corb.... the likes of Blocc ect.