LetsBeef & Voting

[Esso]

Originally Posted by EtH

That's where your misconceptions is coming from. Capping all those multis that dont rhyme is just lack of knowledge as to why we cap multis

Broken is more KIND AND HONEST / LINES IN THE COMMENTS.

This. Capping unnecessary stuff is annoying but it’s not a technical error from a rhyming standpoint.

[Esso]

Originally Posted by EtH

That's where your misconceptions is coming from. Capping all those multis that dont rhyme is just lack of knowledge as to why we cap multis

Broken is more KIND AND HONEST / LINES IN THE COMMENTS.

This. Capping unnecessary stuff is annoying but it’s not a technical error from a rhyming standpoint.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by EtH

Broken is more KIND AND HONEST / LINES IN THE COMMENTS.

This is the DEFINITION of a broken multi.

A syllable count thats off and affects the flow in a negative way.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by EtH

Broken is more KIND AND HONEST / LINES IN THE COMMENTS.

This is the DEFINITION of a broken multi.

A syllable count thats off and affects the flow in a negative way.

[IIAM]

Originally Posted by Zezmeril

As a professional at making broken multies I'll explain

This :hah:

[IIAM]

Originally Posted by Zezmeril

As a professional at making broken multies I'll explain

This :hah:

[EtH]

My example of a broken multi? I used against Lock haha

[EtH]

My example of a broken multi? I used against Lock haha

[IIAM]

Originally Posted by Punk

This is what I tried to explain to stupid ass @TradeMarked

Proof that his VP should be non existent.

Also it’s funny asf to me when ii see people say this:
“Ever heard of slant rhymes bro,
It’s not broken not capping the first parts makes it so. I know cause I’ve been writing like this since 1865” lmfaoo gtfo

DEMAND proTECTION
EXPAND SECTION

[IIAM]

Originally Posted by Punk

This is what I tried to explain to stupid ass @TradeMarked

Proof that his VP should be non existent.

Also it’s funny asf to me when ii see people say this:
“Ever heard of slant rhymes bro,
It’s not broken not capping the first parts makes it so. I know cause I’ve been writing like this since 1865” lmfaoo gtfo

DEMAND proTECTION
EXPAND SECTION

Not entirely against not capping the non rhyming part.

Just a bit weird if I'm being honest. Because in audio tracks syllable counts aren't always looked at.

"Look we food in the DIN AGAIN"

This can fly on tracks and not get called out enough because the definition of words rhyming is that the end of a word sounds the same.

In text though we analyze every syllable pretty closely and we would call it broke.

Not entirely against not capping the non rhyming part.

Just a bit weird if I'm being honest. Because in audio tracks syllable counts aren't always looked at.

"Look we food in the DIN AGAIN"

This can fly on tracks and not get called out enough because the definition of words rhyming is that the end of a word sounds the same.

In text though we analyze every syllable pretty closely and we would call it broke.

[Manhattan]

Originally Posted by Zezmeril

Not entirely against not capping the non rhyming part.

Just a bit weird if I'm being honest. Because in audio tracks syllable counts aren't always looked at.

"Look we food in the DIN AGAIN"

This can fly on tracks and not get called out enough because the definition of words rhyming is that the end of a word sounds the same.

In text though we analyze every syllable pretty closely and we would call it broke.

[Manhattan]

Originally Posted by Zezmeril

Not entirely against not capping the non rhyming part.

Just a bit weird if I'm being honest. Because in audio tracks syllable counts aren't always looked at.

"Look we food in the DIN AGAIN"

This can fly on tracks and not get called out enough because the definition of words rhyming is that the end of a word sounds the same.

In text though we analyze every syllable pretty closely and we would call it broke.