If you want to be considered for a Wild Card entry to the Text OR Audio GC...

[RULE]

LOL @ Sub haha

[RULE]

LOL @ Sub haha

[Edgeworth]

Why is Padre added to the list in the OP? There’s no way you’re letting him join the GC, right?

Obvious multi with no battles but up in the forums talking like they know all of LB history. Tried the exact same shit with the GC last year. Isn’t the whole 5 battle requirement to deter people for just coming back for the tournament? What about someone who has 0 battles PERIOD? Lmao? Stupid ass shit man

And Aggos fucking right. RULE I dunno what proof you got that swiftkeys isn’t Rican but if it’s 10 year old audio battles best be re thinking that. Dudes clearly operating that account and it’s not even a doubt

[Edgeworth]

Why is Padre added to the list in the OP? There’s no way you’re letting him join the GC, right?

Obvious multi with no battles but up in the forums talking like they know all of LB history. Tried the exact same shit with the GC last year. Isn’t the whole 5 battle requirement to deter people for just coming back for the tournament? What about someone who has 0 battles PERIOD? Lmao? Stupid ass shit man

And Aggos fucking right. RULE I dunno what proof you got that swiftkeys isn’t Rican but if it’s 10 year old audio battles best be re thinking that. Dudes clearly operating that account and it’s not even a doubt

Originally Posted by Sabu

Why is Padre added to the list in the OP? There’s no way you’re letting him join the GC, right?

@RULE

Originally Posted by Sabu

Why is Padre added to the list in the OP? There’s no way you’re letting him join the GC, right?

@RULE

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Sabu

Why is Padre added to the list in the OP? There’s no way you’re letting him join the GC, right?

People who post here get added to the list

but thats all it is, a list of people who have asked lol

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Sabu

Why is Padre added to the list in the OP? There’s no way you’re letting him join the GC, right?

People who post here get added to the list

but thats all it is, a list of people who have asked lol

[RULE]

Who the hell is Padre? lol

[RULE]

Who the hell is Padre? lol

[Aggo]

Staff seems like its going out of it's way to protect cheaters, self voters, and nefarious multis. Which is a bit of a slap in the face to members who arent doing everything they can to skirt the rules and cheat people.

The policy of needing concrete solid evidence to infraction people is stupid. There is likely never to be a smoking gun. Let's look at the circumstantial evidence and make educated inferences. Hawt/swift is rican. Its painfully obvious. What good does putting your head in the sand do besides put a cheater on a pedestal while spitting in the face of every user trying to hold his feet to the fire.

Letting one cheater demotivated a large user base of loyal, honest, members is bad business and just plain wrong. I get the "I would give you guys the same benefit of the doubt" but when has someone else come under such scrutiny. This isnt a witch hunt. The evidence is there, the members see and recognize it for what it is. If the dude wasnt one of the sites worst serial cheaters, we wouldnt be talking about it.

The last group of mods did something about it. Ironically guts led that charge. If guts wasnt such a fuck up in every other aspect of his life the one thing he got right might have stuck. He blew it, but that shouldn't give Cheatco Carter blanche to come back on 9 multis, have 7 banned, and continue to pull the wool over staffs eyes.

Its dumb.

[Aggo]

Staff seems like its going out of it's way to protect cheaters, self voters, and nefarious multis. Which is a bit of a slap in the face to members who arent doing everything they can to skirt the rules and cheat people.

The policy of needing concrete solid evidence to infraction people is stupid. There is likely never to be a smoking gun. Let's look at the circumstantial evidence and make educated inferences. Hawt/swift is rican. Its painfully obvious. What good does putting your head in the sand do besides put a cheater on a pedestal while spitting in the face of every user trying to hold his feet to the fire.

Letting one cheater demotivated a large user base of loyal, honest, members is bad business and just plain wrong. I get the "I would give you guys the same benefit of the doubt" but when has someone else come under such scrutiny. This isnt a witch hunt. The evidence is there, the members see and recognize it for what it is. If the dude wasnt one of the sites worst serial cheaters, we wouldnt be talking about it.

The last group of mods did something about it. Ironically guts led that charge. If guts wasnt such a fuck up in every other aspect of his life the one thing he got right might have stuck. He blew it, but that shouldn't give Cheatco Carter blanche to come back on 9 multis, have 7 banned, and continue to pull the wool over staffs eyes.

Its dumb.

Originally Posted by Aggo

Staff seems like its going out of it's way to protect cheaters, self voters, and nefarious multis. Which is a bit of a slap in the face to members who arent doing everything they can to skirt the rules and cheat people.

The policy of needing concrete solid evidence to infraction people is stupid. There is likely never to be a smoking gun. Let's look at the circumstantial evidence and make educated inferences. Hawt/swift is rican. Its painfully obvious. What good does putting your head in the sand do besides put a cheater on a pedestal while spitting in the face of every user trying to hold his feet to the fire.

Letting one cheater demotivated a large user base of loyal, honest, members is bad business and just plain wrong. I get the "I would give you guys the same benefit of the doubt" but when has someone else come under such scrutiny. This isnt a witch hunt. The evidence is there, the members see and recognize it for what it is. If the dude wasnt one of the sites worst serial cheaters, we wouldnt be talking about it.

The last group of mods did something about it. Ironically guts led that charge. If guts wasnt such a fuck up in every other aspect of his life the one thing he got right might have stuck. He blew it, but that shouldn't give Cheatco Carter blanche to come back on 9 multis, have 7 banned, and continue to pull the wool over staffs eyes.

Its dumb.

Careful now. People don't like being told the facts, it seems.

Originally Posted by Aggo

Staff seems like its going out of it's way to protect cheaters, self voters, and nefarious multis. Which is a bit of a slap in the face to members who arent doing everything they can to skirt the rules and cheat people.

The policy of needing concrete solid evidence to infraction people is stupid. There is likely never to be a smoking gun. Let's look at the circumstantial evidence and make educated inferences. Hawt/swift is rican. Its painfully obvious. What good does putting your head in the sand do besides put a cheater on a pedestal while spitting in the face of every user trying to hold his feet to the fire.

Letting one cheater demotivated a large user base of loyal, honest, members is bad business and just plain wrong. I get the "I would give you guys the same benefit of the doubt" but when has someone else come under such scrutiny. This isnt a witch hunt. The evidence is there, the members see and recognize it for what it is. If the dude wasnt one of the sites worst serial cheaters, we wouldnt be talking about it.

The last group of mods did something about it. Ironically guts led that charge. If guts wasnt such a fuck up in every other aspect of his life the one thing he got right might have stuck. He blew it, but that shouldn't give Cheatco Carter blanche to come back on 9 multis, have 7 banned, and continue to pull the wool over staffs eyes.

Its dumb.

Careful now. People don't like being told the facts, it seems.

[RULE]

Staff seems like its going out of it's way to protect cheaters, self voters, and nefarious multis. Which is a bit of a slap in the face to members who arent doing everything they can to skirt the rules and cheat people.

Frankly you can go fuck yourself with this one. staff going out its way to protect cheaters? fuck off.

The policy of needing concrete solid evidence to infraction people is stupid. There is likely never to be a smoking gun. Let's look at the circumstantial evidence and make educated inferences. Hawt/swift is rican. Its painfully obvious. What good does putting your head in the sand do besides put a cheater on a pedestal while spitting in the face of every user trying to hold his feet to the fire.

What good does banning people based on personal opinion do? Lets ask EtH.

Letting one cheater demotivated a large user base of loyal, honest, members is bad business and just plain wrong. I get the "I would give you guys the same benefit of the doubt" but when has someone else come under such scrutiny. This isnt a witch hunt. The evidence is there, the members see and recognize it for what it is. If the dude wasnt one of the sites worst serial cheaters, we wouldnt be talking about it.

Anyone getting demotivated by Rican needs to get thicker skin. What has Rican got away with in the last few months? Got kicked out of the Tag Tourney for an offence that others wouldnt of?

The last group of mods did something about it. Ironically guts led that charge. If guts wasnt such a fuck up in every other aspect of his life the one thing he got right might have stuck. He blew it, but that shouldn't give Cheatco Carter blanche to come back on 9 multis, have 7 banned, and continue to pull the wool over staffs eyes.

The last group of mods actions (and i wasnt here so im not pointing fingers) got ALL staff removed. Something that has never happened in 10 years on LB.


#Agoo4Admin

[RULE]

Staff seems like its going out of it's way to protect cheaters, self voters, and nefarious multis. Which is a bit of a slap in the face to members who arent doing everything they can to skirt the rules and cheat people.

Frankly you can go fuck yourself with this one. staff going out its way to protect cheaters? fuck off.

The policy of needing concrete solid evidence to infraction people is stupid. There is likely never to be a smoking gun. Let's look at the circumstantial evidence and make educated inferences. Hawt/swift is rican. Its painfully obvious. What good does putting your head in the sand do besides put a cheater on a pedestal while spitting in the face of every user trying to hold his feet to the fire.

What good does banning people based on personal opinion do? Lets ask EtH.

Letting one cheater demotivated a large user base of loyal, honest, members is bad business and just plain wrong. I get the "I would give you guys the same benefit of the doubt" but when has someone else come under such scrutiny. This isnt a witch hunt. The evidence is there, the members see and recognize it for what it is. If the dude wasnt one of the sites worst serial cheaters, we wouldnt be talking about it.

Anyone getting demotivated by Rican needs to get thicker skin. What has Rican got away with in the last few months? Got kicked out of the Tag Tourney for an offence that others wouldnt of?

The last group of mods did something about it. Ironically guts led that charge. If guts wasnt such a fuck up in every other aspect of his life the one thing he got right might have stuck. He blew it, but that shouldn't give Cheatco Carter blanche to come back on 9 multis, have 7 banned, and continue to pull the wool over staffs eyes.

The last group of mods actions (and i wasnt here so im not pointing fingers) got ALL staff removed. Something that has never happened in 10 years on LB.


#Agoo4Admin

Originally Posted by RULE

The last group of mods actions (and i wasnt here so im not pointing fingers) got ALL staff removed. Something that has never happened in 10 years on LB.

this is not true. how many times do i have to say that X removed staff because of legal threats against the site. and who provoked that? pugz and rant. none of us had anything to do with that.

he said to all previous staff, this is nothing personal, i am only removing staff because i've been legally advised to do so.

Originally Posted by RULE

The last group of mods actions (and i wasnt here so im not pointing fingers) got ALL staff removed. Something that has never happened in 10 years on LB.

this is not true. how many times do i have to say that X removed staff because of legal threats against the site. and who provoked that? pugz and rant. none of us had anything to do with that.

he said to all previous staff, this is nothing personal, i am only removing staff because i've been legally advised to do so.

[RULE]

Guess thats why you were re-modded then

[RULE]

Guess thats why you were re-modded then