Top 100 Text Battlers Of All Time

Originally Posted by Godbody

No, Joe Muggz would squash you, which he did

4% of the votes. And you're a mod? Bro at least hack yourself to 20% lol

People that I've beaten would wipe the floor with you. But you dont need me to tell you that, Punk already did.

Have you beaten 1 Hall of Famer or Grand Champion? Let alone several like I have?

I'll wait.

I know the answer though. But I'll wait.

i would beat half of those hof if they came back

you would lose to most

Originally Posted by Godbody

No, Joe Muggz would squash you, which he did

4% of the votes. And you're a mod? Bro at least hack yourself to 20% lol

People that I've beaten would wipe the floor with you. But you dont need me to tell you that, Punk already did.

Have you beaten 1 Hall of Famer or Grand Champion? Let alone several like I have?

I'll wait.

I know the answer though. But I'll wait.

i would beat half of those hof if they came back

you would lose to most

[EtH]

I mean, if you're talking audio, you wouldn't get out of the first round.

While text has improved, audio has noooooot.

[EtH]

I mean, if you're talking audio, you wouldn't get out of the first round.

While text has improved, audio has noooooot.

[Godbody]

Originally Posted by Zodiac-5

I mean, if you're talking audio, you wouldn't get out of the first round.

While text has improved, audio has noooooot.

Facts. Audio was crazy back then

[Godbody]

Originally Posted by Zodiac-5

I mean, if you're talking audio, you wouldn't get out of the first round.

While text has improved, audio has noooooot.

Facts. Audio was crazy back then

Godbody was dope back in the day. One of the original Hoodrich All Stars & then came back to have a very respectable audio battling run. If he put more effort into tournaments and extended his writing years a little longer he might have even made HOF.

Godbody was dope back in the day. One of the original Hoodrich All Stars & then came back to have a very respectable audio battling run. If he put more effort into tournaments and extended his writing years a little longer he might have even made HOF.

I forgot about @FiNAL WoRD

I forgot about @FiNAL WoRD

Originally Posted by Chef Punk

I forgot about @FiNAL WoRD

& @Naturill

Originally Posted by Chef Punk

I forgot about @FiNAL WoRD

& @Naturill

[EtH]

Final Word was considered but I actually reckon Final was mostly known in text. He picked up a handful of wins here and there but wouldn't have been seen like Ambitious or IAmFlow. Definitely could be a shout to go in there though. Maybe around the me, HVK and Nick level potentially.

I don't reckon Nat would be above anyone in that list. Nat was a really really good prospect for about a year then sort of just faded away after it.

[EtH]

Final Word was considered but I actually reckon Final was mostly known in text. He picked up a handful of wins here and there but wouldn't have been seen like Ambitious or IAmFlow. Definitely could be a shout to go in there though. Maybe around the me, HVK and Nick level potentially.

I don't reckon Nat would be above anyone in that list. Nat was a really really good prospect for about a year then sort of just faded away after it.

Originally Posted by Zodiac-5

Final Word was considered but I actually reckon Final was mostly known in text. He picked up a handful of wins here and there but wouldn't have been seen like Ambitious or IAmFlow. Definitely could be a shout to go in there though. Maybe around the me, HVK and Nick level potentially.

I don't reckon Nat would be above anyone in that list. Nat was a really really good prospect for about a year then sort of just faded away after it.

I think that's bonkers. Final excelled in audio and was nowhere near as prolific as a textcee. He wouldn't make my list for text.

On a different note, I think it would be fun to create an alternative list which disregards legacy entirely and ranks people solely on skill. I can't be bothered to do it but maybe one of you will.

Originally Posted by Zodiac-5

Final Word was considered but I actually reckon Final was mostly known in text. He picked up a handful of wins here and there but wouldn't have been seen like Ambitious or IAmFlow. Definitely could be a shout to go in there though. Maybe around the me, HVK and Nick level potentially.

I don't reckon Nat would be above anyone in that list. Nat was a really really good prospect for about a year then sort of just faded away after it.

I think that's bonkers. Final excelled in audio and was nowhere near as prolific as a textcee. He wouldn't make my list for text.

On a different note, I think it would be fun to create an alternative list which disregards legacy entirely and ranks people solely on skill. I can't be bothered to do it but maybe one of you will.

Originally Posted by Musashi

I think that's bonkers. Final excelled in audio and was nowhere near as prolific as a textcee.

I was gonna say this. Idk wtf Eth talking about. Dude was more of an audio head. He still got all his live battles on the LB page.

Originally Posted by Musashi

I think that's bonkers. Final excelled in audio and was nowhere near as prolific as a textcee.

I was gonna say this. Idk wtf Eth talking about. Dude was more of an audio head. He still got all his live battles on the LB page.

[EtH]

Read the context cunts, I clearly meant to say audio. How would "I'm not sure about him on this text list because he was primarily a text guy" make any sense? haha.

[EtH]

Read the context cunts, I clearly meant to say audio. How would "I'm not sure about him on this text list because he was primarily a text guy" make any sense? haha.