Should non-staff members be able to have 3+ VP?

[MaCc Da G0D]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I agree with the OP that exceptional voters should be granted 3 VP - Shodan, Babylon, Rai, Esso would be a few good examples. I see NOBLE's point too but I haven't seen any conflict like that in recent times over VP so I don't really foresee this being an issue.

Its Not a Conflict ONLY Because People Are Scared Shitless to Stand Up to LB authority because of the Political prowess and Power that Those In Power Flex With. As Has been Stated in Previous Post NOBODY'S VOTE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANOTHER PERSONS. The only People who should have VP above 2 is the Admins.

There should Never Be a '1' VP just make Everyone's '2' so when A Battle Has 5 Votes, the Person with 2 votes Won't Win Bkus of Some Opinionated Justification Of a 'Great Voter'

This Shit Needs To Be Fixed Asap!!

[MaCc Da G0D]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I agree with the OP that exceptional voters should be granted 3 VP - Shodan, Babylon, Rai, Esso would be a few good examples. I see NOBLE's point too but I haven't seen any conflict like that in recent times over VP so I don't really foresee this being an issue.

Its Not a Conflict ONLY Because People Are Scared Shitless to Stand Up to LB authority because of the Political prowess and Power that Those In Power Flex With. As Has been Stated in Previous Post NOBODY'S VOTE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANOTHER PERSONS. The only People who should have VP above 2 is the Admins.

There should Never Be a '1' VP just make Everyone's '2' so when A Battle Has 5 Votes, the Person with 2 votes Won't Win Bkus of Some Opinionated Justification Of a 'Great Voter'

This Shit Needs To Be Fixed Asap!!

Originally Posted by MaCcZmum SeCurity

NOBODY'S VOTE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANOTHER PERSONS.

Yes it is. These votes should never be equally weighted.

Originally Posted by MaCcZmum SeCurity

NOBODY'S VOTE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANOTHER PERSONS.

Yes it is. These votes should never be equally weighted.

Originally Posted by Nicholas

Yes it is. These votes should never be equally weighted.

That’s why it’s the mods job to delete those type of votes. We’ve gotten lazy and just started handing people 0 VP so we can take some work off our plates. If those people had 2 vp, voting like complete idiots, there would be more work for the staff which we should have. If they continue to vote that way, they get infracted, or banned. But ya mods really don’t have much work to do on here lol.

Originally Posted by Nicholas

Yes it is. These votes should never be equally weighted.

That’s why it’s the mods job to delete those type of votes. We’ve gotten lazy and just started handing people 0 VP so we can take some work off our plates. If those people had 2 vp, voting like complete idiots, there would be more work for the staff which we should have. If they continue to vote that way, they get infracted, or banned. But ya mods really don’t have much work to do on here lol.

Originally Posted by Son of Dubai

That’s why it’s the mods job to delete those type of votes. We’ve gotten lazy and just started handing people 0 VP so we can take some work off our plates. If those people had 2 vp, voting like complete idiots, there would be more work for the staff which we should have. If they continue to vote that way, they get infracted, or banned. But ya mods really don’t have much work to do on here lol.

It took me about 20 minutes earlier to go through one users voting history and delete the votes. It would take me 20 seconds to lower their VP to 0. In the same 20 minutes I could update all of the LBA/LBT threads, vote on several battles etc. And that was just one user.

I don't think it's laziness I just don't think deleting votes instead of lowering VP is a good time investment especially when all new users automatically get 2 VP. Whether you think that's right or wrong it's not going to change soon as it would require an admin to make a change to the code.

The first user didn't break the rules so it's hard to issue a ban for that. There was talk of implementing a minimum character limit on the voting boxes but it never happened. Again though, lets not hold out hope for code changes and do nothing in the meantime.

Do you have a better suggestion than 3 VP for Staff, sliding scale of 0 - 3 VP for members? If we can get a few suggestions we can poll it in the staff forum and implement. Let's refrain from changes that require coding until X is active again and focus on the immediate changes we can make.

Originally Posted by Son of Dubai

That’s why it’s the mods job to delete those type of votes. We’ve gotten lazy and just started handing people 0 VP so we can take some work off our plates. If those people had 2 vp, voting like complete idiots, there would be more work for the staff which we should have. If they continue to vote that way, they get infracted, or banned. But ya mods really don’t have much work to do on here lol.

It took me about 20 minutes earlier to go through one users voting history and delete the votes. It would take me 20 seconds to lower their VP to 0. In the same 20 minutes I could update all of the LBA/LBT threads, vote on several battles etc. And that was just one user.

I don't think it's laziness I just don't think deleting votes instead of lowering VP is a good time investment especially when all new users automatically get 2 VP. Whether you think that's right or wrong it's not going to change soon as it would require an admin to make a change to the code.

The first user didn't break the rules so it's hard to issue a ban for that. There was talk of implementing a minimum character limit on the voting boxes but it never happened. Again though, lets not hold out hope for code changes and do nothing in the meantime.

Do you have a better suggestion than 3 VP for Staff, sliding scale of 0 - 3 VP for members? If we can get a few suggestions we can poll it in the staff forum and implement. Let's refrain from changes that require coding until X is active again and focus on the immediate changes we can make.

[Babylon]

yeah, this shouldnt even be a debate everyone should be at an equal playing field in VP. If voting had anything to do with being a moderator a few dudes around here wouldve had green coats a lot sooner.

This vp system ran most efficiently when there were more people on site. Now a single mod vote can sway the outcome of a battle, its happened to me hella times from regular bouts to tournaments & im certain yall have had it happen as well. A better question and topic of debate however would be Xs breezy transition into the same ole "completely ghost under the promise of a new version/site" spiel.

I wonder how long it'll take us to realize this & go back to being collectively angsty at the owners again?

[Babylon]

yeah, this shouldnt even be a debate everyone should be at an equal playing field in VP. If voting had anything to do with being a moderator a few dudes around here wouldve had green coats a lot sooner.

This vp system ran most efficiently when there were more people on site. Now a single mod vote can sway the outcome of a battle, its happened to me hella times from regular bouts to tournaments & im certain yall have had it happen as well. A better question and topic of debate however would be Xs breezy transition into the same ole "completely ghost under the promise of a new version/site" spiel.

I wonder how long it'll take us to realize this & go back to being collectively angsty at the owners again?

[Rain Matrix 2021]

I remember I'd always read battles n vote fair I didn't care who it was. then I learned I had 0 vp lol ... Meanwhile a couple of mods would blatently hate vote my shit

Mods are people & people are faulty. Even cops break the law (quite a fuckin bit actually)

I think new niggas & biased voters should have 1vp , everyone else get 2. Expos Shouldn't matter , if it's a fair vote it should atleast be worth as much as a hate vote with a fake ass explanation ( @Esso )


Real shit tho why do mods even care about having a high vp it doesnt benefit you.. And like Babylon said , 1 mod vote will completely sway a battle it's retarded

[Rain Matrix 2021]

I remember I'd always read battles n vote fair I didn't care who it was. then I learned I had 0 vp lol ... Meanwhile a couple of mods would blatently hate vote my shit

Mods are people & people are faulty. Even cops break the law (quite a fuckin bit actually)

I think new niggas & biased voters should have 1vp , everyone else get 2. Expos Shouldn't matter , if it's a fair vote it should atleast be worth as much as a hate vote with a fake ass explanation ( @Esso )


Real shit tho why do mods even care about having a high vp it doesnt benefit you.. And like Babylon said , 1 mod vote will completely sway a battle it's retarded

Originally Posted by Rain Matrix 2017

Meanwhile a couple of mods would blatently hate vote my shit

What mods are hate voting you? I think you're a cunt, yet I just voted for you. Explain that.

Originally Posted by Rain Matrix 2017

Meanwhile a couple of mods would blatently hate vote my shit

What mods are hate voting you? I think you're a cunt, yet I just voted for you. Explain that.

[Rain Matrix 2021]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

What mods are hate voting you? I think you're a cunt, yet I just voted for you. Explain that.

Nah not you this was a while back. Nigga would forum beef me , and vote against me on all my battles


Point is , they're right. Ur not a bad voter , but u got too much power. If it's a close one , it pretty much comes down to whoever u want to win

[Rain Matrix 2021]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

What mods are hate voting you? I think you're a cunt, yet I just voted for you. Explain that.

Nah not you this was a while back. Nigga would forum beef me , and vote against me on all my battles


Point is , they're right. Ur not a bad voter , but u got too much power. If it's a close one , it pretty much comes down to whoever u want to win

[RULE]

Should all staff have 3+VP is another question worth asking..

[RULE]

Should all staff have 3+VP is another question worth asking..

I agree with this. It doesn't make sense for mods to have double the vp of the sites best non staff voters.

I agree with this. It doesn't make sense for mods to have double the vp of the sites best non staff voters.