Some Ideas To Make LBT More Competitive - Lets Beef

**GOOD GRIEF** · #1 04-21-2013, 04:44 PM

1. no one can challenge someone more than 2 spots above them. I think someone whose #9 challenging #2 and winning, and then skipping that far ahead is bull. this makes it so you actually have to climb up the ladder. from the bottom to the top wit work ya know?

2. if you lose a challenge (as in you challenge someone and you lose), you have till the end of the month to defend your spot again. so even if you already defended it once (like the rules say you have to every month), if you lose a challenge you made you have to defend again.

3. ALSO if you lose a challenge you made, you can't challenge for another spot till the month is up. this adds pressure and gives challengers something to lose.

**GOOD GRIEF** · 04-21-2013, 04:44 PM

1. no one can challenge someone more than 2 spots above them. I think someone whose #9 challenging #2 and winning, and then skipping that far ahead is bull. this makes it so you actually have to climb up the ladder. from the bottom to the top wit work ya know?

2. if you lose a challenge (as in you challenge someone and you lose), you have till the end of the month to defend your spot again. so even if you already defended it once (like the rules say you have to every month), if you lose a challenge you made you have to defend again.

3. ALSO if you lose a challenge you made, you can't challenge for another spot till the month is up. this adds pressure and gives challengers something to lose.

**V3numb** · #2 04-21-2013, 04:48 PM

i completely agree with all of that.. i read some of the rules before and wondered why it wasnt set up like that in the 1st place tbh

**V3numb** · 04-21-2013, 04:48 PM

i completely agree with all of that.. i read some of the rules before and wondered why it wasnt set up like that in the 1st place tbh

**X-Calibur** · #3 04-21-2013, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

1. no one can challenge someone more than 2 spots above them. I think someone whose #9 challenging #2 and winning, and then skipping that far ahead is bull. this makes it so you actually have to climb up the ladder. from the bottom to the top wit work ya know?

2. if you lose a challenge (as in you challenge someone and you lose), you have till the end of the month to defend your spot again. so even if you already defended it once (like the rules say you have to every month), if you lose a challenge you made you have to defend again.

3. ALSO if you lose a challenge you made, you can't challenge for another spot till the month is up. this adds pressure and gives challengers something to lose.

All valid points i also think if your #1 idea comes into play they should increase it from 10 to 20 ....

Good shouts tho

**X-Calibur** · 04-21-2013, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

1. no one can challenge someone more than 2 spots above them. I think someone whose #9 challenging #2 and winning, and then skipping that far ahead is bull. this makes it so you actually have to climb up the ladder. from the bottom to the top wit work ya know?

2. if you lose a challenge (as in you challenge someone and you lose), you have till the end of the month to defend your spot again. so even if you already defended it once (like the rules say you have to every month), if you lose a challenge you made you have to defend again.

3. ALSO if you lose a challenge you made, you can't challenge for another spot till the month is up. this adds pressure and gives challengers something to lose.

All valid points i also think if your #1 idea comes into play they should increase it from 10 to 20 ....

Good shouts tho

**GRizzEAT** · #4 04-21-2013, 04:52 PM

I have an idea. Jus gimme tha title and call it a night.

**GRizzEAT** · 04-21-2013, 04:52 PM

I have an idea. Jus gimme tha title and call it a night.

**GOOD GRIEF** · #5 04-21-2013, 04:53 PM

^that'd be a lot to keep up with. another idea i have is maybe every month there is a wildcard poll. top 2 winners of the poll battle. winner of the battle can challenge #10-#6 for there spots. @X-Calibur

**GOOD GRIEF** · 04-21-2013, 04:53 PM

^that'd be a lot to keep up with. another idea i have is maybe every month there is a wildcard poll. top 2 winners of the poll battle. winner of the battle can challenge #10-#6 for there spots. @X-Calibur

**Black Book** · #6 04-21-2013, 04:56 PM

If you're not on the list, you should only be able to challenge the 9th or 10th seed to get on it. Then I say you move up by the two ahead of you shit. I also think that people should be forced to battle one person 2 ahead or 2 behind them a month because if not, they'll all just sit their not doing anything until it's their turn... Which could be months.

**Black Book** · 04-21-2013, 04:56 PM

If you're not on the list, you should only be able to challenge the 9th or 10th seed to get on it. Then I say you move up by the two ahead of you shit. I also think that people should be forced to battle one person 2 ahead or 2 behind them a month because if not, they'll all just sit their not doing anything until it's their turn... Which could be months.

**X-Calibur** · #7 04-21-2013, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

^that'd be a lot to keep up with. another idea i have is maybe every month there is a wildcard poll. top 2 winners of the poll battle. winner of the battle can challenge #10-#6 for there spots. @X-Calibur

Not if you recruited someone else In on it to keep it up dated

Hmm I like that idea also but every month is kinda slow should be every two weeks or week ....

---------- Post added at 09:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:58 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Master Yoda

If you're not on the list, you should only be able to challenge the 9th or 10th seed to get on it. Then I say you move up by the two ahead of you shit. I also think that people should be forced to battle one person 2 ahead or 2 behind them a month because if not, they'll all just sit their not doing anything until it's their turn... Which could be months.

You mean like they already are ...

---------- Post added at 11:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:59 PM ----------

@AfterThought

whats you thinking dude

**X-Calibur** · 04-21-2013, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

^that'd be a lot to keep up with. another idea i have is maybe every month there is a wildcard poll. top 2 winners of the poll battle. winner of the battle can challenge #10-#6 for there spots. @X-Calibur

Not if you recruited someone else In on it to keep it up dated

Hmm I like that idea also but every month is kinda slow should be every two weeks or week ....

---------- Post added at 09:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:58 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Master Yoda

If you're not on the list, you should only be able to challenge the 9th or 10th seed to get on it. Then I say you move up by the two ahead of you shit. I also think that people should be forced to battle one person 2 ahead or 2 behind them a month because if not, they'll all just sit their not doing anything until it's their turn... Which could be months.

You mean like they already are ...

---------- Post added at 11:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:59 PM ----------

@AfterThought

whats you thinking dude