...hall of fame nominations...

[Erupt da Monsta]

Originally Posted by Askari

It's not catching feelings, although you did hit a nerve in a sense. My point is that you're making everyone else out to be idiots because they disagree with your opinion. If anything that's a lack of an open mind. I saw your original point and even agreed if you remember, but carrying on as if anyone who disagrees is a fool is incredibly narrow-minded and not something that sits well with me, which is why I felt you had an ulterior motive.

As for yer man with the avy troubles, I have no time to fix it at the minute with having a new job and exams just now, but I WILL get to it when I get a chance. This job doesn't pay y'know?

Nah, its not narrow minded , you just catchin feelins. Forget a motive , u agree with me.. then say i hax a motive?and narrow minded .. its either im narrow minded or im 100 percent right leaving little room for debate. Theres a difference. Theres a bigger point that is being stressed here. Use your logic n u come to the conclusion that i do. Call it narrow minded or just being flat out correct and actually giving a fuck about the HOF (the end all of l.b accomplishments) being made a mockery and going to shit. Once again get out your feelins.

[Erupt da Monsta]

Originally Posted by Askari

It's not catching feelings, although you did hit a nerve in a sense. My point is that you're making everyone else out to be idiots because they disagree with your opinion. If anything that's a lack of an open mind. I saw your original point and even agreed if you remember, but carrying on as if anyone who disagrees is a fool is incredibly narrow-minded and not something that sits well with me, which is why I felt you had an ulterior motive.

As for yer man with the avy troubles, I have no time to fix it at the minute with having a new job and exams just now, but I WILL get to it when I get a chance. This job doesn't pay y'know?

Nah, its not narrow minded , you just catchin feelins. Forget a motive , u agree with me.. then say i hax a motive?and narrow minded .. its either im narrow minded or im 100 percent right leaving little room for debate. Theres a difference. Theres a bigger point that is being stressed here. Use your logic n u come to the conclusion that i do. Call it narrow minded or just being flat out correct and actually giving a fuck about the HOF (the end all of l.b accomplishments) being made a mockery and going to shit. Once again get out your feelins.

[Askari]

Originally Posted by Erupt

Nah, its not narrow minded , you just catchin feelins. Forget a motive , u agree with me.. then say i hax a motive?and narrow minded .. its either im narrow minded or im 100 percent right leaving little room for debate. Theres a difference. Theres a bigger point that is being stressed here. Use your logic n u come to the conclusion that i do. Call it narrow minded or just being flat out correct and actually giving a fuck about the HOF (the end all of l.b accomplishments) being made a mockery and going to shit. Once again get out your feelins.

Saying you're 100% IS narrow minded though, because you refuse to take other opinions into account. Surely that's not too difficult to grasp? Using my logic I see you're point regarding the best of the best and exclusivity, but your criteria is bullshit IMO. Based on your reckoning DeNiro B Milk shouldn't be there because he never "dominated" the site for an extended period, but since he started people knew he was one of the greatest, even though he lost most of his most memorable battles. Agreeing with RULE here; it should be about legacy, not titles or wins necessarily. Your confusing my feelings with logic and reason my man, twist that however you please, but anyone with a grain of intelligence can see the point I'm making.

---------- Post added at 09:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:37 PM ----------

As for the "GC titles, active, dominating" you've all described myself as far as text goes, but I don't deserve to be there yet. B Milk does, because his legacy, persona and style is legendary WITHOUT titles. Would Real Talk be there without his titles, or DaDDiO? Of course they fucking would.

[Askari]

Originally Posted by Erupt

Nah, its not narrow minded , you just catchin feelins. Forget a motive , u agree with me.. then say i hax a motive?and narrow minded .. its either im narrow minded or im 100 percent right leaving little room for debate. Theres a difference. Theres a bigger point that is being stressed here. Use your logic n u come to the conclusion that i do. Call it narrow minded or just being flat out correct and actually giving a fuck about the HOF (the end all of l.b accomplishments) being made a mockery and going to shit. Once again get out your feelins.

Saying you're 100% IS narrow minded though, because you refuse to take other opinions into account. Surely that's not too difficult to grasp? Using my logic I see you're point regarding the best of the best and exclusivity, but your criteria is bullshit IMO. Based on your reckoning DeNiro B Milk shouldn't be there because he never "dominated" the site for an extended period, but since he started people knew he was one of the greatest, even though he lost most of his most memorable battles. Agreeing with RULE here; it should be about legacy, not titles or wins necessarily. Your confusing my feelings with logic and reason my man, twist that however you please, but anyone with a grain of intelligence can see the point I'm making.

---------- Post added at 09:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:37 PM ----------

As for the "GC titles, active, dominating" you've all described myself as far as text goes, but I don't deserve to be there yet. B Milk does, because his legacy, persona and style is legendary WITHOUT titles. Would Real Talk be there without his titles, or DaDDiO? Of course they fucking would.

[Manny Festo]

i think fulcanelli should be in the HOF.....dude was dope

so was decius and amun ra

[Manny Festo]

i think fulcanelli should be in the HOF.....dude was dope

so was decius and amun ra

[Revan]

Winning a tournament shouldnt have to be a must. Wouldnt Michael Jordan not be HOF worthy if he never got a ring? Pele if he never won a trophy? Its down to skill, impact & legacy imo. Though i concede capturing a "prestigious" site title is a big bonus.

That being said i think people need to remember when making there nominations that the HOF is NOT for skilled battlers alone. Theres probably hundreds of people who are highly skilled, the HOF is for those absolutely legendary site members who have left a lasting legacy and impact on the site.

There are many people who have become bonafide heavyweights on this site, but that alone doesnt equate to HOF status.

Continue nominating whoever you like but no-one will go into the HOF without deserving it.

1/

[Revan]

Winning a tournament shouldnt have to be a must. Wouldnt Michael Jordan not be HOF worthy if he never got a ring? Pele if he never won a trophy? Its down to skill, impact & legacy imo. Though i concede capturing a "prestigious" site title is a big bonus.

That being said i think people need to remember when making there nominations that the HOF is NOT for skilled battlers alone. Theres probably hundreds of people who are highly skilled, the HOF is for those absolutely legendary site members who have left a lasting legacy and impact on the site.

There are many people who have become bonafide heavyweights on this site, but that alone doesnt equate to HOF status.

Continue nominating whoever you like but no-one will go into the HOF without deserving it.

1/

[Revan]

Howabout Kobe then? No rings but he's already a dead cert for the HOF.

& your point just confirms my own. You dont need trophys to be a HOF'er.

[Revan]

Howabout Kobe then? No rings but he's already a dead cert for the HOF.

& your point just confirms my own. You dont need trophys to be a HOF'er.

[Revan]

Originally Posted by Plaudit

But Kobe has won 5 Championships.

My bad i aint american lol.

that other one, LeBron?

[Revan]

Originally Posted by Plaudit

But Kobe has won 5 Championships.

My bad i aint american lol.

that other one, LeBron?

[Revan]

Originally Posted by Plaudit

But Le Bron is only 28 and he isn't IN the Hall Of Fame.

He WILL be, without doubt, regardless of if he ever wins a title.

[Revan]

Originally Posted by Plaudit

But Le Bron is only 28 and he isn't IN the Hall Of Fame.

He WILL be, without doubt, regardless of if he ever wins a title.

[Erupt da Monsta]

RULE... u dont watch the nba, lol they give Lebron hell about not winnin a ring. They do whole segments about him not havin a ring on sportscenter./

[Erupt da Monsta]

RULE... u dont watch the nba, lol they give Lebron hell about not winnin a ring. They do whole segments about him not havin a ring on sportscenter./

[Revan]

Originally Posted by Erupt

RULE... u dont watch the nba, lol they give Lebron hell about not winnin a ring. They do whole segments about him not havin a ring on sportscenter./

But if he retired tomorrow would he or would he not be in the HOF?

[Revan]

Originally Posted by Erupt

RULE... u dont watch the nba, lol they give Lebron hell about not winnin a ring. They do whole segments about him not havin a ring on sportscenter./

But if he retired tomorrow would he or would he not be in the HOF?

[Erupt da Monsta]

The nba argument is flawed.. these players play 12 some even 20 seasons. With the ultimate goal to win a ring. When its playoff time they dont noshow. Not the case with LB. U cant compare the 2 to that degree. Letsbeef clearly doesnt hold the GC tourney to the same standards as nba titles. How many noshows are there every year? If u want to make that point make the point that hof nominees need to put in 10 -15 seasons n /years of dedication towards one ultimate goal... the nba title/GC title.

---------- Post added at 02:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:42 PM ----------

This gos with any sport for that matter. They put in work n dedication for a ring.

[Erupt da Monsta]

The nba argument is flawed.. these players play 12 some even 20 seasons. With the ultimate goal to win a ring. When its playoff time they dont noshow. Not the case with LB. U cant compare the 2 to that degree. Letsbeef clearly doesnt hold the GC tourney to the same standards as nba titles. How many noshows are there every year? If u want to make that point make the point that hof nominees need to put in 10 -15 seasons n /years of dedication towards one ultimate goal... the nba title/GC title.

---------- Post added at 02:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:42 PM ----------

This gos with any sport for that matter. They put in work n dedication for a ring.