King Titles

[Malishus]

Originally Posted by Rieper

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

[Malishus]

Originally Posted by Rieper

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by Malishus

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

^ fair enough. It was just announced as a battle with that stipulation in the LBT thread, is all. But probably a miscommunication then by the sounds of it.

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by Malishus

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

^ fair enough. It was just announced as a battle with that stipulation in the LBT thread, is all. But probably a miscommunication then by the sounds of it.

Yeah, this shits a joke.

Yeah, this shits a joke.

Illo is the only person to have 7 defenses excluding no shows I'm pretty sure and should be the only one with the title.

Everyone else's title is a participation trophy at this point.

Illo is the only person to have 7 defenses excluding no shows I'm pretty sure and should be the only one with the title.

Everyone else's title is a participation trophy at this point.

[RULE]

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

[RULE]

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

Originally Posted by RULE

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

This a good idea

Originally Posted by RULE

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

This a good idea

Originally Posted by RULE

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

Still should be 7 consecutive ACTUAL wins minimum and then I agree.

Originally Posted by RULE

Here's an idea: One LBA & LBT king ONLY.

Title goes to the person with the most LBA / LBT title victories.

Simple & easy.

Still should be 7 consecutive ACTUAL wins minimum and then I agree.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Noir

Still should be 7 consecutive ACTUAL wins minimum and then I agree.

I dont see why the number 7 so important lol

Surely the if someone has 3x 6 win streaks they are more a "King" than one person with a 7 streak.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Noir

Still should be 7 consecutive ACTUAL wins minimum and then I agree.

I dont see why the number 7 so important lol

Surely the if someone has 3x 6 win streaks they are more a "King" than one person with a 7 streak.

Originally Posted by RULE

I dont see why the number 7 so important lol

Surely the if someone has 3x 6 win streaks they are more a "King" than one person with a 7 streak.

the number 7 is random and meaningless. we need new criteria. i propose an annual vote.

Originally Posted by RULE

I dont see why the number 7 so important lol

Surely the if someone has 3x 6 win streaks they are more a "King" than one person with a 7 streak.

the number 7 is random and meaningless. we need new criteria. i propose an annual vote.

Originally Posted by RULE

I dont see why the number 7 so important lol

Surely the if someone has 3x 6 win streaks they are more a "King" than one person with a 7 streak.

No, they're not.. Someone winning 6 then losing means they didn't reign undisputed, someone came and took over their shit. And, the whole reason this title was started was because illo had an undisputed 7 battle run, so that should be the standard.

Originally Posted by RULE

I dont see why the number 7 so important lol

Surely the if someone has 3x 6 win streaks they are more a "King" than one person with a 7 streak.

No, they're not.. Someone winning 6 then losing means they didn't reign undisputed, someone came and took over their shit. And, the whole reason this title was started was because illo had an undisputed 7 battle run, so that should be the standard.