Would you participate in a crew draft/league?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

But no crew has more than 9 active members.

Apoc has a whole two crews in their ranks. All active. 14 of them. Minus the two who don't exist, by your logic, because they're LESS active. (But still log on frequently. Like a lot of AC's members...)

And why are we including red ribbon, anyway? Since inactive members don't count, again, by your bastardization, as they're comprised almost entirely of inactive members.

Anyway, my two threads are not OVERTLY interconnected. Limiting the crews should happen with or without a draft, because of the stimulus it provides to the voting pool.

But, since we're arguing them as a singular point. Not only does limiting the crews in this way propagate voting growth. But, a draft also allows more active members of almost entirely inactive crews to join more active, competition based crews. And as its primarily rooted in a voluntary basis it gives other members a chance to build their own crews outside of the draft structure, if they so choose. People who might be more interested in running a crew as opposed to competing explicitly themselves, e.g. a RULE type.

Not only that, but it shakes things up battle wise, in regard to match ups. People are inherently less inclined to battle their own crew members outside of tournies/ppvs. A recurring draft allots fresher match ups, and more opportunities not only for varied and growing voting. But, for more things to vote ON as a reader. I, personally, get sick of reading the same battles over and over again.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

But no crew has more than 9 active members.

Apoc has a whole two crews in their ranks. All active. 14 of them. Minus the two who don't exist, by your logic, because they're LESS active. (But still log on frequently. Like a lot of AC's members...)

And why are we including red ribbon, anyway? Since inactive members don't count, again, by your bastardization, as they're comprised almost entirely of inactive members.

Anyway, my two threads are not OVERTLY interconnected. Limiting the crews should happen with or without a draft, because of the stimulus it provides to the voting pool.

But, since we're arguing them as a singular point. Not only does limiting the crews in this way propagate voting growth. But, a draft also allows more active members of almost entirely inactive crews to join more active, competition based crews. And as its primarily rooted in a voluntary basis it gives other members a chance to build their own crews outside of the draft structure, if they so choose. People who might be more interested in running a crew as opposed to competing explicitly themselves, e.g. a RULE type.

Not only that, but it shakes things up battle wise, in regard to match ups. People are inherently less inclined to battle their own crew members outside of tournies/ppvs. A recurring draft allots fresher match ups, and more opportunities not only for varied and growing voting. But, for more things to vote ON as a reader. I, personally, get sick of reading the same battles over and over again.

[Subreal]

Peaceful beats his wife

[Subreal]

Peaceful beats his wife

This is all easy to say when you're in GOAT.

This is all easy to say when you're in GOAT.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

This is all easy to say when you're in GOAT.

This would be easy to say in ANY crew.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

This is all easy to say when you're in GOAT.

This would be easy to say in ANY crew.

[X-Calibur]

PLOT TWIST ....

Why not open voting up to leaders and captains on their own crew battles ....

These positions are given in crews primarily because they are seen a senior to the basic members based on their activity/knowledge/skill.

Just throwing that out there ....

[X-Calibur]

PLOT TWIST ....

Why not open voting up to leaders and captains on their own crew battles ....

These positions are given in crews primarily because they are seen a senior to the basic members based on their activity/knowledge/skill.

Just throwing that out there ....

Ops has 9 plus one multi js

Ops has 9 plus one multi js

Originally Posted by Row

Ops has 9 plus one multi js

So how many does it have in total? #RantLogic

Letsbeef would benefit massively if Dean and Lyve Science were crewless, despite their inactivity.

Originally Posted by Row

Ops has 9 plus one multi js

So how many does it have in total? #RantLogic

Letsbeef would benefit massively if Dean and Lyve Science were crewless, despite their inactivity.

I think 8 is a good number. A crew draft would indeed shake things up.

I think 8 is a good number. A crew draft would indeed shake things up.

@Rants doing everything in his power to be in the same crew as me. Even if it’s gambling on a crew draft. You ain’t slick, fat boy

@Rants doing everything in his power to be in the same crew as me. Even if it’s gambling on a crew draft. You ain’t slick, fat boy

[Bape]

Originally Posted by Prince of Dubai

@Rants doing everything in his power to be in the same crew as me. Even if it’s gambling on a crew draft. You ain’t slick, fat boy

I fuck w the new avi fag

[Bape]

Originally Posted by Prince of Dubai

@Rants doing everything in his power to be in the same crew as me. Even if it’s gambling on a crew draft. You ain’t slick, fat boy

I fuck w the new avi fag