Now that the battle with Dave is over.. - Page 2 - Lets Beef

**EtH** · #1 10-17-2019, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Papi Rican Q

Subreal is calling you on it.

Explain yourself.

Kinda proves my point that you don't have an updated version of microsoft office.

I just said it was an oversight. I got the line wrong. I've already discussed this with Subreal (who made it very clear he wasn't calling me out).

Okay, now that has been decided...

YOU are the one "correcting the line". So, as a result, please explain for everyone why you would buy rows using excel?

**EtH** · 10-17-2019, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Papi Rican Q

Subreal is calling you on it.

Explain yourself.

Kinda proves my point that you don't have an updated version of microsoft office.

I just said it was an oversight. I got the line wrong. I've already discussed this with Subreal (who made it very clear he wasn't calling me out).

Okay, now that has been decided...

YOU are the one "correcting the line". So, as a result, please explain for everyone why you would buy rows using excel?

**Denton** · #2 10-17-2019, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subreal

Good battle Dave, I liked your verse, with the exception of one bar.

And @Shodan you're a fucking idiot for calling this the best bar of his verse.

I know that if we asked he would CLAIM IT'S DEMOCRATIC but we both know the votes were Rows to sell like a TABLE THAT WAS CRAFTED for a DATABASE OF FAGGOTS (Rows to cell).

This bar doesn't even make sense because the wp doesn't work. Row didn't sell votes. Row bought votes. This bar is implying Row sold votes for cash and voted on other peoples battles. It should have been 'rows to buy', but of course that ruins the bar and makes 0 sense.

It makes perfect sense to those who know a thing or two about Excel spreadsheets and basic text database structure

**Denton** · 10-17-2019, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subreal

Good battle Dave, I liked your verse, with the exception of one bar.

And @Shodan you're a fucking idiot for calling this the best bar of his verse.

I know that if we asked he would CLAIM IT'S DEMOCRATIC but we both know the votes were Rows to sell like a TABLE THAT WAS CRAFTED for a DATABASE OF FAGGOTS (Rows to cell).

This bar doesn't even make sense because the wp doesn't work. Row didn't sell votes. Row bought votes. This bar is implying Row sold votes for cash and voted on other peoples battles. It should have been 'rows to buy', but of course that ruins the bar and makes 0 sense.

It makes perfect sense to those who know a thing or two about Excel spreadsheets and basic text database structure

#3 10-17-2019, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denton

It makes perfect sense to those who know a thing or two about Excel spreadsheets and basic text database structure

The set up is a reach.

---------- Post added at 04:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

I got the line wrong. I've already discussed this with Subreal (who made it very clear he wasn't calling me out).

That's all. Don't get resented.

10-17-2019, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denton

It makes perfect sense to those who know a thing or two about Excel spreadsheets and basic text database structure

The set up is a reach.

---------- Post added at 04:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

I got the line wrong. I've already discussed this with Subreal (who made it very clear he wasn't calling me out).

That's all. Don't get resented.

**Denton** · #4 10-17-2019, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rican

The set up is a reach.

---------- Post added at 04:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------

That's all. Don't get resented.

I understood the correlation within one read-over and no expo lmoa

**Denton** · 10-17-2019, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rican

The set up is a reach.

---------- Post added at 04:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------

That's all. Don't get resented.

I understood the correlation within one read-over and no expo lmoa

**Subreal** · #5 10-17-2019, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denton

I understood the correlation within one read-over and no expo lmoa

but you are still missing the point. the correlation doesn't work because Row bought votes and didn't sell votes..

**Subreal** · 10-17-2019, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denton

I understood the correlation within one read-over and no expo lmoa

but you are still missing the point. the correlation doesn't work because Row bought votes and didn't sell votes..

#6 10-17-2019, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denton

I understood the correlation within one read-over and no expo lmoa

I mean, yeah but the inaccuracy makes the punch not hit as it should.

10-17-2019, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denton

I understood the correlation within one read-over and no expo lmoa

I mean, yeah but the inaccuracy makes the punch not hit as it should.

**Subreal** · #7 10-17-2019, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denton

It makes perfect sense to those who know a thing or two about Excel spreadsheets and basic text database structure

That's not the point. The point is it would've worked if row sold votes, but he didn't sell them. He bought them. so "rows to sell" doesn't work. Has nothing to do with understanding what would've been the concept.

**Subreal** · 10-17-2019, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denton

It makes perfect sense to those who know a thing or two about Excel spreadsheets and basic text database structure

That's not the point. The point is it would've worked if row sold votes, but he didn't sell them. He bought them. so "rows to sell" doesn't work. Has nothing to do with understanding what would've been the concept.

**EtH** · #8 10-17-2019, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subreal

That's not the point. The point is it would've worked if row sold votes, but he didn't sell them. He bought them. so "rows to sell" doesn't work. Has nothing to do with understanding what would've been the concept.

This is correct.

**EtH** · 10-17-2019, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Subreal

That's not the point. The point is it would've worked if row sold votes, but he didn't sell them. He bought them. so "rows to sell" doesn't work. Has nothing to do with understanding what would've been the concept.

This is correct.