stop battling

Dude.... face it, you need help. Mods would’ve already been on this instead of reranking every battle.

People have to watch the battle end before their report is even looked at.

Dude.... face it, you need help. Mods would’ve already been on this instead of reranking every battle.

People have to watch the battle end before their report is even looked at.

[X]

Originally Posted by Punk

Dude.... face it, you need help. Mods would’ve already been on this instead of reranking every battle.

People have to watch the battle end before their report is even looked at.

I'm working on bringing back the mod program, I proposed an idea to make it more fair in another thread: https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/show...56#post1177056

Let me restate the ideas here to get your feedback:

1) In the new moderator system to make decisions more fair: individual moderators can propose to delete battles & votes, but another moderator has to agree with their decision. That way it's not an individual making a broad decision, but a consensus. Thoughts on this?

2) This opens up the discussion around bringing back moderators - if that were to happen I'd like to hear new ideas for how moderators could be fairly selected for the role. Maybe a community voting process?

[X]

Originally Posted by Punk

Dude.... face it, you need help. Mods would’ve already been on this instead of reranking every battle.

People have to watch the battle end before their report is even looked at.

I'm working on bringing back the mod program, I proposed an idea to make it more fair in another thread: https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/show...56#post1177056

Let me restate the ideas here to get your feedback:

1) In the new moderator system to make decisions more fair: individual moderators can propose to delete battles & votes, but another moderator has to agree with their decision. That way it's not an individual making a broad decision, but a consensus. Thoughts on this?

2) This opens up the discussion around bringing back moderators - if that were to happen I'd like to hear new ideas for how moderators could be fairly selected for the role. Maybe a community voting process?

Originally Posted by X

I'm working on bringing back the mod program, I proposed an idea to make it more fair in another thread: https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/show...56#post1177056

Let me restate the ideas here to get your feedback:

1) In the new moderator system to make decisions more fair: individual moderators can propose to delete battles & votes, but another moderator has to agree with their decision. That way it's not an individual making a broad decision, but a consensus. Thoughts on this?

2) This opens up the discussion around bringing back moderators - if that were to happen I'd like to hear new ideas for how moderators could be fairly selected for the role. Maybe a community voting process?

This is what the hell im talking about. Definitely a community vote system + yes a mod request to delete battle or vote and another mod confirms/handles it. That would be perfect.

Originally Posted by X

I'm working on bringing back the mod program, I proposed an idea to make it more fair in another thread: https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/show...56#post1177056

Let me restate the ideas here to get your feedback:

1) In the new moderator system to make decisions more fair: individual moderators can propose to delete battles & votes, but another moderator has to agree with their decision. That way it's not an individual making a broad decision, but a consensus. Thoughts on this?

2) This opens up the discussion around bringing back moderators - if that were to happen I'd like to hear new ideas for how moderators could be fairly selected for the role. Maybe a community voting process?

This is what the hell im talking about. Definitely a community vote system + yes a mod request to delete battle or vote and another mod confirms/handles it. That would be perfect.

[Erupt da Monsta]

Originally Posted by X

I'm working on bringing back the mod program, I proposed an idea to make it more fair in another thread: https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/show...56#post1177056

Let me restate the ideas here to get your feedback:

1) In the new moderator system to make decisions more fair: individual moderators can propose to delete battles & votes, but another moderator has to agree with their decision. That way it's not an individual making a broad decision, but a consensus. Thoughts on this?

2) This opens up the discussion around bringing back moderators - if that were to happen I'd like to hear new ideas for how moderators could be fairly selected for the role. Maybe a community voting process?

All decisions should have been done that way from the jump, but yeah def would need the approval of another mod.

Also what’s the consensus on how high mod vote power should be? Keep it the same or what? Was this apart of the issue and or reason they were , they meaning mods were removed ?

[Erupt da Monsta]

Originally Posted by X

I'm working on bringing back the mod program, I proposed an idea to make it more fair in another thread: https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/show...56#post1177056

Let me restate the ideas here to get your feedback:

1) In the new moderator system to make decisions more fair: individual moderators can propose to delete battles & votes, but another moderator has to agree with their decision. That way it's not an individual making a broad decision, but a consensus. Thoughts on this?

2) This opens up the discussion around bringing back moderators - if that were to happen I'd like to hear new ideas for how moderators could be fairly selected for the role. Maybe a community voting process?

All decisions should have been done that way from the jump, but yeah def would need the approval of another mod.

Also what’s the consensus on how high mod vote power should be? Keep it the same or what? Was this apart of the issue and or reason they were , they meaning mods were removed ?

Originally Posted by X

I'm working on bringing back the mod program, I proposed an idea to make it more fair in another thread: https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/show...56#post1177056

Let me restate the ideas here to get your feedback:

1) In the new moderator system to make decisions more fair: individual moderators can propose to delete battles & votes, but another moderator has to agree with their decision. That way it's not an individual making a broad decision, but a consensus. Thoughts on this?

2) This opens up the discussion around bringing back moderators - if that were to happen I'd like to hear new ideas for how moderators could be fairly selected for the role. Maybe a community voting process?

I love both of these ideas. I hope they come to fruition. Keep up the good work @X.

Originally Posted by X

I'm working on bringing back the mod program, I proposed an idea to make it more fair in another thread: https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/show...56#post1177056

Let me restate the ideas here to get your feedback:

1) In the new moderator system to make decisions more fair: individual moderators can propose to delete battles & votes, but another moderator has to agree with their decision. That way it's not an individual making a broad decision, but a consensus. Thoughts on this?

2) This opens up the discussion around bringing back moderators - if that were to happen I'd like to hear new ideas for how moderators could be fairly selected for the role. Maybe a community voting process?

I love both of these ideas. I hope they come to fruition. Keep up the good work @X.

[Erupt da Monsta]

I’m down to mod if this comes back just get at me

[Erupt da Monsta]

I’m down to mod if this comes back just get at me

[Óðinn]

If I remember correctly; Mods had a VP of 6. The FVC has a VP of 4 and then members had a VP of 2 ( though some had 1 and many had 0 due to the voting etc)

As for the joint decision of battles being modded is certainly a good look.

[Óðinn]

If I remember correctly; Mods had a VP of 6. The FVC has a VP of 4 and then members had a VP of 2 ( though some had 1 and many had 0 due to the voting etc)

As for the joint decision of battles being modded is certainly a good look.

Mods having 6 VP is just flat out ridiculous. Because the guys a mod, he’s considered the best voter on the site? What makes anyone’s vote more special than someone else’s in a sport based on preferences????

Mods having 6 VP is just flat out ridiculous. Because the guys a mod, he’s considered the best voter on the site? What makes anyone’s vote more special than someone else’s in a sport based on preferences????

Originally Posted by Punk

Mods having 6 VP is just flat out ridiculous. Because the guys a mod, he’s considered the best voter on the site? What makes anyone’s vote more special than someone else’s in a sport based on preferences????

fvc and staff have 4 vp.

everyone else currently has 2.

i think staff shouldn't gain higher vp just for being staff, but staff could also be in the FVC if they are good enough at voting to belong there.

Originally Posted by Punk

Mods having 6 VP is just flat out ridiculous. Because the guys a mod, he’s considered the best voter on the site? What makes anyone’s vote more special than someone else’s in a sport based on preferences????

fvc and staff have 4 vp.

everyone else currently has 2.

i think staff shouldn't gain higher vp just for being staff, but staff could also be in the FVC if they are good enough at voting to belong there.

Originally Posted by n e r o

fvc and staff have 4 vp.

everyone else currently has 2.

i think staff shouldn't gain higher vp just for being staff, but staff could also be in the FVC if they are good enough at voting to belong there.

We’re trying to fix the site... you stay far away from this and any further threads fam. You’ve done enough.

Edit: just because you’re in some “fair voters” Girl Scout club doesn’t make you a better voter than me and I have 2 VP and very well known to be one of the most fair voters on the site when I do vote. Once you understand that, voting will be handled properly.

Originally Posted by n e r o

fvc and staff have 4 vp.

everyone else currently has 2.

i think staff shouldn't gain higher vp just for being staff, but staff could also be in the FVC if they are good enough at voting to belong there.

We’re trying to fix the site... you stay far away from this and any further threads fam. You’ve done enough.

Edit: just because you’re in some “fair voters” Girl Scout club doesn’t make you a better voter than me and I have 2 VP and very well known to be one of the most fair voters on the site when I do vote. Once you understand that, voting will be handled properly.