|

11-13-2013, 03:45 PM
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 2 Won / 1 Lost
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody
How the fuck are "as a result" and "as a result of" different?
You used two sentences that were
I think, as a result, I am
I think, as a reuslt of, I am
No fucking shit they won't work in that context. That's basic grammar B. Is that really the strongest counter-argument you can come up with to defend how you completely missed the mark on the definition of "therefore" and how I was only 1 word off? LOL
1 word off is better than getting the definition completely wrong.
I think, therefore I am.
I think, as a result of that, I am.
I think, as a result, I am.
You sleep, therefore you snore.
I snore as a result of me sleeping.
I sleep, as a result, I snore.
Your argument is that the sentence "I think, as a result of, I am" doesn't work. No fucking shit, that's basic grammar. lmao.
When you use words in their proper context your dumbass will cease to defend any incredulous (and losing) arguments that you may have. Go to sleep baby girl.
|
I could explain in more detail why you were wrong in previous posts, and why you are again wrong here, but i's losing its entertainment value. What I think would entertain me one last time is for you to explain how I "got the definition completely wrong." Also, check out the definition of the word "incredulous" before you use it again, because I actually feel like there is a chance, though extremely minute, that you will use it correctly after doing so.
Last edited by ⅃( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)L; 11-13-2013 at 03:51 PM.
|
11-13-2013, 03:45 PM
|
#1
|
Ranked Text Record 2 Won / 1 Lost
Join Date: Jun 2013
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godbody
How the fuck are "as a result" and "as a result of" different?
You used two sentences that were
I think, as a result, I am
I think, as a reuslt of, I am
No fucking shit they won't work in that context. That's basic grammar B. Is that really the strongest counter-argument you can come up with to defend how you completely missed the mark on the definition of "therefore" and how I was only 1 word off? LOL
1 word off is better than getting the definition completely wrong.
I think, therefore I am.
I think, as a result of that, I am.
I think, as a result, I am.
You sleep, therefore you snore.
I snore as a result of me sleeping.
I sleep, as a result, I snore.
Your argument is that the sentence "I think, as a result of, I am" doesn't work. No fucking shit, that's basic grammar. lmao.
When you use words in their proper context your dumbass will cease to defend any incredulous (and losing) arguments that you may have. Go to sleep baby girl.
|
I could explain in more detail why you were wrong in previous posts, and why you are again wrong here, but i's losing its entertainment value. What I think would entertain me one last time is for you to explain how I "got the definition completely wrong." Also, check out the definition of the word "incredulous" before you use it again, because I actually feel like there is a chance, though extremely minute, that you will use it correctly after doing so.
Last edited by ⅃( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)L; 11-13-2013 at 03:51 PM.
|
Offline
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 AM.
|
|
|