Fair Voter's Club.

[J u s T C]

It has to be handled case by case.

[J u s T C]

It has to be handled case by case.

[Obey]

On that note, Obey for FVC.

[Obey]

On that note, Obey for FVC.

[ILLoKWENT]

Originally Posted by CakedOut

We need more people like you, I'ma keep it real. It's a certain mod on here who puts there crew members in the fvc. I got a infraction when I 1st joined this site that lowered my vp to 0.. to this day, I still have the same vp even though I'm 1 of the fairest voters.

I know u aint talkin bout me faggit... especially when in order to get in they are voted in by different judges that I have no control in.

[ILLoKWENT]

Originally Posted by CakedOut

We need more people like you, I'ma keep it real. It's a certain mod on here who puts there crew members in the fvc. I got a infraction when I 1st joined this site that lowered my vp to 0.. to this day, I still have the same vp even though I'm 1 of the fairest voters.

I know u aint talkin bout me faggit... especially when in order to get in they are voted in by different judges that I have no control in.

Originally Posted by Just C

It has to be handled case by case.

Let's say this is true. What stops from any one individual from "playing nice" for a few weeks? IE: I vote with suitable expos on 5 battles in the attempt to assure my place in the FVC. This works, and I am voted in. What stops me, then, from returning to my previous behavior?

Originally Posted by Just C

It has to be handled case by case.

Let's say this is true. What stops from any one individual from "playing nice" for a few weeks? IE: I vote with suitable expos on 5 battles in the attempt to assure my place in the FVC. This works, and I am voted in. What stops me, then, from returning to my previous behavior?

[ILLoKWENT]

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini

Let's say this is true. What stops from any one individual from "playing nice" for a few weeks? IE: I vote with suitable expos on 5 battles in the attempt to assure my place in the FVC. This works, and I am voted in. What stops me, then, from returning to my previous behavior?

The prerequisite for applyin to fvc is u cant have been infracted or banned for voting type stuff within the last 3-6 months from when u applied..

[ILLoKWENT]

Originally Posted by Victor Mancini

Let's say this is true. What stops from any one individual from "playing nice" for a few weeks? IE: I vote with suitable expos on 5 battles in the attempt to assure my place in the FVC. This works, and I am voted in. What stops me, then, from returning to my previous behavior?

The prerequisite for applyin to fvc is u cant have been infracted or banned for voting type stuff within the last 3-6 months from when u applied..

[Denton]

@ILLoKWENT only has a little discretion to whos let in the fvc. ACs just has good voters. He cant help if they make the cut more than others

[Denton]

@ILLoKWENT only has a little discretion to whos let in the fvc. ACs just has good voters. He cant help if they make the cut more than others

Originally Posted by ILLoKWENT

The prerequisite for applyin to fvc is u cant have been infracted or banned for voting type stuff within the last 3-6 months from when u applied..

Why should they be allowed to have been infracted for their voting AT ALL is the question.

Originally Posted by ILLoKWENT

The prerequisite for applyin to fvc is u cant have been infracted or banned for voting type stuff within the last 3-6 months from when u applied..

Why should they be allowed to have been infracted for their voting AT ALL is the question.

[J u s T C]

I can't speak for anyone else but I find it easy to see through the kind of front you're talking about.

And for arguments sake. Even if 1 does slip through the net by faking it's easy to keep an eye on their votes once they're in in order to spot a relapse.

[J u s T C]

I can't speak for anyone else but I find it easy to see through the kind of front you're talking about.

And for arguments sake. Even if 1 does slip through the net by faking it's easy to keep an eye on their votes once they're in in order to spot a relapse.

Another hypothetical, then, @Just C say that the party KNOWS they're under scrutiny, but, harbors resentment against another member. What stops them, then, from voting against them on their battles while giving them a reasonable rating?

Another hypothetical, then, @Just C say that the party KNOWS they're under scrutiny, but, harbors resentment against another member. What stops them, then, from voting against them on their battles while giving them a reasonable rating?

Why is it that FVC members can't be blocked? Wouldn't that solve this problem?

Why is it that FVC members can't be blocked? Wouldn't that solve this problem?